@@ -908,10 +908,10 @@ static void shmem_undo_range(struct inod
struct folio_batch fbatch;
pgoff_t indices[PAGEVEC_SIZE];
struct folio *folio;
+ bool same_folio;
long nr_swaps_freed = 0;
pgoff_t index;
int i;
- bool partial_end;
if (lend == -1)
end = -1; /* unsigned, so actually very big */
@@ -947,18 +947,14 @@ static void shmem_undo_range(struct inod
index++;
}
- partial_end = ((lend + 1) % PAGE_SIZE) > 0;
+ same_folio = (lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT) == (lend >> PAGE_SHIFT);
shmem_get_folio(inode, lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT, &folio, SGP_READ);
if (folio) {
- bool same_page;
-
- same_page = lend < folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio);
- if (same_page)
- partial_end = false;
+ same_folio = lend < folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio);
folio_mark_dirty(folio);
if (!truncate_inode_partial_folio(folio, lstart, lend)) {
start = folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio);
- if (same_page)
+ if (same_folio)
end = folio->index;
}
folio_unlock(folio);
@@ -966,8 +962,8 @@ static void shmem_undo_range(struct inod
folio = NULL;
}
- if (partial_end)
- shmem_get_folio(inode, end, &folio, SGP_READ);
+ if (!same_folio)
+ shmem_get_folio(inode, lend >> PAGE_SHIFT, &folio, SGP_READ);
if (folio) {
folio_mark_dirty(folio);
if (!truncate_inode_partial_folio(folio, lstart, lend))
@@ -347,8 +347,8 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct a
pgoff_t indices[PAGEVEC_SIZE];
pgoff_t index;
int i;
- struct folio * folio;
- bool partial_end;
+ struct folio *folio;
+ bool same_folio;
if (mapping_empty(mapping))
goto out;
@@ -385,12 +385,10 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct a
cond_resched();
}
- partial_end = ((lend + 1) % PAGE_SIZE) > 0;
+ same_folio = (lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT) == (lend >> PAGE_SHIFT);
folio = __filemap_get_folio(mapping, lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT, FGP_LOCK, 0);
if (folio) {
- bool same_folio = lend < folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio);
- if (same_folio)
- partial_end = false;
+ same_folio = lend < folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio);
if (!truncate_inode_partial_folio(folio, lstart, lend)) {
start = folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio);
if (same_folio)
@@ -401,8 +399,9 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct a
folio = NULL;
}
- if (partial_end)
- folio = __filemap_get_folio(mapping, end, FGP_LOCK, 0);
+ if (!same_folio)
+ folio = __filemap_get_folio(mapping, lend >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ FGP_LOCK, 0);
if (folio) {
if (!truncate_inode_partial_folio(folio, lstart, lend))
end = folio->index;
As reported before in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.LSU.2.11.2011160128001.1206@eggly.anvils/ shmem_undo_range() mods sometimes caused good data to be zeroed when running my tmpfs swapping loads. Only the ext4-on-loop0-on-tmpfs mount was seen to suffer, and that is mounted with "-o discard": which punches holes in the underlying tmpfs file. shmem_undo_range() partial_end handling was wrong: if (lend + 1) aligned to page but not to folio, the second shmem_get_folio() could be skipped, then the whole of that folio punched out instead of treated partially. Rename same_page to same_folio (like in truncate.c), and rely on that instead of partial_end: fewer variables, less confusion. And considering an off-by-one in setting same_folio initially, pointed to an off-by-one in the second shmem_get_folio(): it should be on (lend >> PAGE_SHIFT) not end - which had caused no data loss, but could split folio unnecessarily. And apply these same fixes in truncate_inode_pages_range(). Fixes: 8842c9c23524 ("truncate,shmem: Handle truncates that split large folios") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> --- mm/shmem.c | 16 ++++++---------- mm/truncate.c | 15 +++++++-------- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)