@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static inline pte_marker copy_pte_marker(
{
pte_marker srcm = pte_marker_get(entry);
/* Always copy error entries. */
- pte_marker dstm = srcm & PTE_MARKER_POISONED;
+ pte_marker dstm = srcm & (PTE_MARKER_POISONED | PTE_MARKER_GUARD);
/* Only copy PTE markers if UFFD register matches. */
if ((srcm & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP) && userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
@@ -426,9 +426,15 @@ typedef unsigned long pte_marker;
* "Poisoned" here is meant in the very general sense of "future accesses are
* invalid", instead of referring very specifically to hardware memory errors.
* This marker is meant to represent any of various different causes of this.
+ *
+ * Note that, when encountered by the faulting logic, PTEs with this marker will
+ * result in VM_FAULT_HWPOISON and thus regardless trigger hardware memory error
+ * logic.
*/
#define PTE_MARKER_POISONED BIT(1)
-#define PTE_MARKER_MASK (BIT(2) - 1)
+/* Indicates that, on fault, this PTE will case a SIGSEGV signal to be sent. */
+#define PTE_MARKER_GUARD BIT(2)
+#define PTE_MARKER_MASK (BIT(3) - 1)
static inline swp_entry_t make_pte_marker_entry(pte_marker marker)
{
@@ -461,9 +467,25 @@ static inline swp_entry_t make_poisoned_swp_entry(void)
}
static inline int is_poisoned_swp_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ /*
+ * We treat guard pages as poisoned too as these have the same semantics
+ * as poisoned ranges, only with different fault handling.
+ */
+ return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) &&
+ (pte_marker_get(entry) &
+ (PTE_MARKER_POISONED | PTE_MARKER_GUARD));
+}
+
+static inline swp_entry_t make_guard_swp_entry(void)
+{
+ return make_pte_marker_entry(PTE_MARKER_GUARD);
+}
+
+static inline int is_guard_swp_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
{
return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) &&
- (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_POISONED);
+ (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_GUARD);
}
/*
@@ -6353,6 +6353,9 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX(hstate_index(h));
goto out_mutex;
+ } else if (marker & PTE_MARKER_GUARD) {
+ ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+ goto out_mutex;
}
}
@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ static inline bool should_zap_folio(struct zap_details *details,
return !folio_test_anon(folio);
}
-static inline bool zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(struct zap_details *details)
+static inline bool zap_drop_markers(struct zap_details *details)
{
if (!details)
return false;
@@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (vma_is_anonymous(vma))
return;
- if (zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(details))
+ if (zap_drop_markers(details))
return;
for (;;) {
@@ -1671,7 +1671,15 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
* drop the marker if explicitly requested.
*/
if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma) &&
- !zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(details))
+ !zap_drop_markers(details))
+ continue;
+ } else if (is_guard_swp_entry(entry)) {
+ /*
+ * Ordinary zapping should not remove guard PTE
+ * markers. Only do so if we should remove PTE markers
+ * in general.
+ */
+ if (!zap_drop_markers(details))
continue;
} else if (is_hwpoison_entry(entry) ||
is_poisoned_swp_entry(entry)) {
@@ -4003,6 +4011,10 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_marker(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (marker & PTE_MARKER_POISONED)
return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
+ /* Hitting a guard page is always a fatal condition. */
+ if (marker & PTE_MARKER_GUARD)
+ return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+
if (pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp(entry))
return pte_marker_handle_uffd_wp(vmf);
Add a new PTE marker that results in any access causing the accessing process to segfault. This is preferable to PTE_MARKER_POISONED, which results in the same handling as hardware poisoned memory, and is thus undesirable for cases where we simply wish to 'soft' poison a range. This is in preparation for implementing the ability to specify guard pages at the page table level, i.e. ranges that, when accessed, should cause process termination. Additionally, rename zap_drop_file_uffd_wp() to zap_drop_markers() - the function checks the ZAP_FLAG_DROP_MARKER flag so naming it for this single purpose was simply incorrect. We then reuse the same logic to determine whether a zap should clear a guard entry - this should only be performed on teardown and never on MADV_DONTNEED or the like. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> --- include/linux/mm_inline.h | 2 +- include/linux/swapops.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- mm/hugetlb.c | 3 +++ mm/memory.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)