@@ -265,24 +265,14 @@ extern bool __tlb_remove_page_size(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
* This both sets 'delayed_rmap', and returns true. It would be an inline
* function, except we define it before the 'struct mmu_gather'.
*/
-#define tlb_delay_rmap(tlb) (((tlb)->delayed_rmap = 1), true)
+#define tlb_delay_rmap(tlb) (((tlb)->delayed_rmap = 1), true)
+#define tlb_reset_delay_rmap(tlb) ((tlb)->delayed_rmap = 0)
+#define tlb_rmap_delayed(tlb) ((tlb)->delayed_rmap)
extern void tlb_flush_rmaps(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
#endif
#endif
-/*
- * We have a no-op version of the rmap removal that doesn't
- * delay anything. That is used on S390, which flushes remote
- * TLBs synchronously, and on UP, which doesn't have any
- * remote TLBs to flush and is not preemptible due to this
- * all happening under the page table lock.
- */
-#ifndef tlb_delay_rmap
-#define tlb_delay_rmap(tlb) (false)
-static inline void tlb_flush_rmaps(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma) { }
-#endif
-
/*
* struct mmu_gather is an opaque type used by the mm code for passing around
* any data needed by arch specific code for tlb_remove_page.
@@ -313,10 +303,12 @@ struct mmu_gather {
*/
unsigned int freed_tables : 1;
+#ifdef tlb_delay_rmap
/*
* Do we have pending delayed rmap removals?
*/
unsigned int delayed_rmap : 1;
+#endif
/*
* at which levels have we cleared entries?
@@ -346,6 +338,20 @@ struct mmu_gather {
#endif
};
+/*
+ * We have a no-op version of the rmap removal that doesn't
+ * delay anything. That is used on S390, which flushes remote
+ * TLBs synchronously, and on UP, which doesn't have any
+ * remote TLBs to flush and is not preemptible due to this
+ * all happening under the page table lock.
+ */
+#ifndef tlb_delay_rmap
+#define tlb_delay_rmap(tlb) (false)
+#define tlb_reset_delay_rmap(tlb) do { } while (0)
+#define tlb_rmap_delayed(tlb) (false)
+static inline void tlb_flush_rmaps(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma) { }
+#endif
+
void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
static inline void __tlb_adjust_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static bool tlb_next_batch(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
struct mmu_gather_batch *batch;
/* No more batching if we have delayed rmaps pending */
- if (tlb->delayed_rmap)
+ if (tlb_rmap_delayed(tlb))
return false;
batch = tlb->active;
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ void tlb_flush_rmaps(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct mmu_gather_batch *batch;
- if (!tlb->delayed_rmap)
+ if (!tlb_rmap_delayed(tlb))
return;
batch = tlb->active;
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void tlb_flush_rmaps(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
}
}
- tlb->delayed_rmap = 0;
+ tlb_reset_delay_rmap(tlb);
}
#endif
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void __tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
tlb->active = &tlb->local;
tlb->batch_count = 0;
#endif
- tlb->delayed_rmap = 0;
+ tlb_reset_delay_rmap(tlb);
tlb_table_init(tlb);
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE
In cases the delayed rmap removal is not used (which are currently UP and s390) skip delayed_rmap flag and make the related code paths no-op. Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> --- include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++------------- mm/mmu_gather.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)