@@ -2532,7 +2532,7 @@ int mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
if (!card)
return 1;
- if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE)
+ if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host))
return 0;
ret = mmc_card_removed(card);
@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
return;
/* If there is a non-removable card registered, only scan once */
- if ((host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && host->rescan_entered)
+ if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->rescan_entered)
return;
host->rescan_entered = 1;
@@ -2587,8 +2587,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
* if there is a _removable_ card registered, check whether it is
* still present
*/
- if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead
- && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
+ if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead && mmc_card_is_removable(host))
host->bus_ops->detect(host);
host->detect_change = 0;
@@ -2613,7 +2612,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
mmc_bus_put(host);
mmc_claim_host(host);
- if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && host->ops->get_cd &&
+ if (mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->ops->get_cd &&
host->ops->get_cd(host) == 0) {
mmc_power_off(host);
mmc_release_host(host);
In linux/mmc/host.h, mmc_card_is_removable() is already defined. There is no reason that it doesn't use. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> --- drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)