diff mbox series

mmc: host: Kconfig: Allow selecting MMC_SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC for RZ/Five SoC

Message ID 20230901113703.314667-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series mmc: host: Kconfig: Allow selecting MMC_SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC for RZ/Five SoC | expand

Commit Message

Lad, Prabhakar Sept. 1, 2023, 11:37 a.m. UTC 
From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

Make MMC_SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC visible for RISC-V architecture so that we can
select this config option for RZ/Five SoC which is based on RISC-V
architecture.

Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
---
Hi Geert/Ulf,

I was in two minds here whether I should instead add dependency for
ARCH_R9A07G043 instead of RISCV. But adding dependency for RISCV allows
us to get this config option freely for future coming RISC-V Renesas
SoCs.

Cheers, Prabhakar
---
 drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Geert Uytterhoeven Sept. 1, 2023, 11:40 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Prabhakar,

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:37 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> Make MMC_SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC visible for RISC-V architecture so that we can
> select this config option for RZ/Five SoC which is based on RISC-V
> architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> I was in two minds here whether I should instead add dependency for
> ARCH_R9A07G043 instead of RISCV. But adding dependency for RISCV allows
> us to get this config option freely for future coming RISC-V Renesas
> SoCs.
>
> Cheers, Prabhakar
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> index 554e67103c1a..5190881cb204 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> @@ -677,9 +677,9 @@ config MMC_SDHI_SYS_DMAC
>
>  config MMC_SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC
>         tristate "DMA for SDHI SD/SDIO controllers using on-chip bus mastering"
> -       depends on ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470 || COMPILE_TEST
> +       depends on ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470 || RISCV || COMPILE_TEST
>         depends on MMC_SDHI
> -       default MMC_SDHI if (ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470)
> +       default MMC_SDHI if (ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470 || RISCV)

This would expose this option to a growing number of non-Renesas
RISC-V platforms.  What about using ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
instead?

>         help
>           This provides DMA support for SDHI SD/SDIO controllers
>           using on-chip bus mastering. This supports the controllers

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
index 554e67103c1a..5190881cb204 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
@@ -677,9 +677,9 @@  config MMC_SDHI_SYS_DMAC
 
 config MMC_SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC
 	tristate "DMA for SDHI SD/SDIO controllers using on-chip bus mastering"
-	depends on ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470 || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470 || RISCV || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on MMC_SDHI
-	default MMC_SDHI if (ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470)
+	default MMC_SDHI if (ARM64 || ARCH_R7S9210 || ARCH_R8A77470 || RISCV)
 	help
 	  This provides DMA support for SDHI SD/SDIO controllers
 	  using on-chip bus mastering. This supports the controllers