From patchwork Mon Aug 26 21:04:53 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Judith Mendez X-Patchwork-Id: 13778469 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC82137775; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.142 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724706300; cv=none; b=UjAaGnV78RZx+MCRzfyE194zYsFPYWDuavkSPQiwmtl82BqUGLM7KLN2yH9dUi/PAWHEoKz5fR9oIKLbGSdbNbW0UalnrKBaVjuVo06ziN8Dlcb/3k4qNkmyPAUfCyFNg/czhHx1rU+FtXh2BNOKR60NF2CeJqZWq8rGwoGCd0E= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724706300; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RkJOPPUr+iLA/t2/ApInRv0JE7/c0ZhgEfGnBKjLL94=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N7XKCxGUGRctHUG/jeTQdwZrO9sXiPm5bWINkLSLRxde8+nJfpCf1+/87ZFokEQbIFnJ8rzrHz/bs3124JTCOf0BlazpDQvwCveYH2ccGGQpBiOiMHDZDCBz5I5z6SpM8JHJyAH0qPFopzMpWpyyuY58JA0c/LvQHkWD7mX1haM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=f50Rl4a/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.142 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="f50Rl4a/" Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 47QL4tKa023827; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:04:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1724706295; bh=UCmTSqinwUqH5BdS9Q4Gq4nP0L76eLqD81yXdiNljyY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=f50Rl4a/r+rRicLowDTTtsWta6ea+R2YxHQVwSBH+XzJz0kvrpWY+kn+242sdZXs7 //g0FwRPxPkti1NUSygIIC/Daax3r8srfCfj8NtSUQ+/0XFewNduAdV36vxoi0PNAl aVkEXRSO9mOtBgRuSrzy/gmBU7b9Ww57IEjEif/Q= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 47QL4tLt027356 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:04:55 -0500 Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:04:54 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.249) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:04:54 -0500 Received: from judy-hp.dhcp.ti.com (judy-hp.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.105]) by lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 47QL4sZV089210; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:04:54 -0500 From: Judith Mendez To: Ulf Hansson CC: Adrian Hunter , , Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add retry tuning Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:04:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20240826210454.3928033-2-jm@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20240826210454.3928033-1-jm@ti.com> References: <20240826210454.3928033-1-jm@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Add retry tuning up to 10 times if we fail to find a failing region or no passing itapdly. This is necessary since some eMMC has been observed to never find a failing itapdly on the first couple of tuning iterations, but eventually does. Keep count of current tuning iteration using tuning_loop. It has been observed that the tuning algorithm does not need to loop more than 10 times before finding a failing itapdly. Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez Acked-by: Adrian Hunter --- Changes since v2: - Use do while loop instead of while in patch 1/2 - Move initialization of tuning_loop to sdhci_am654_init - Separate error path in patch 1/2 --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c index 64e10f7c9faa3..13da003363e1d 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ #define CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ 50000000 #define SDHCI_AM654_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY -1 +#define RETRY_TUNING_MAX 10 /* Command Queue Host Controller Interface Base address */ #define SDHCI_AM654_CQE_BASE_ADDR 0x200 @@ -151,6 +152,7 @@ struct sdhci_am654_data { u32 flags; u32 quirks; bool dll_enable; + u32 tuning_loop; #define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_FORCE_CDTEST BIT(0) }; @@ -443,7 +445,7 @@ static u32 sdhci_am654_cqhci_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask) #define ITAPDLY_LENGTH 32 #define ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX (ITAPDLY_LENGTH - 1) -static u32 sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(struct sdhci_host *host, struct window +static int sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(struct sdhci_host *host, struct window *fail_window, u8 num_fails, bool circular_buffer) { u8 itap = 0, start_fail = 0, end_fail = 0, pass_length = 0; @@ -453,12 +455,14 @@ static u32 sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(struct sdhci_host *host, struct window int prev_fail_end = -1; u8 i; - if (!num_fails) - return ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX >> 1; + if (!num_fails) { + /* Retry tuning */ + return -1; + } if (fail_window->length == ITAPDLY_LENGTH) { - dev_err(dev, "No passing ITAPDLY, return 0\n"); - return 0; + /* Retry tuning */ + return -1; } first_fail_start = fail_window->start; @@ -494,8 +498,8 @@ static u32 sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(struct sdhci_host *host, struct window return (itap > ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX) ? ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX >> 1 : itap; } -static int sdhci_am654_platform_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, - u32 opcode) +static int sdhci_am654_do_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, + u32 opcode) { struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); @@ -532,13 +536,30 @@ static int sdhci_am654_platform_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, if (fail_window[fail_index].length != 0) fail_index++; - itap = sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(host, fail_window, fail_index, - sdhci_am654->dll_enable); + return sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(host, fail_window, fail_index, + sdhci_am654->dll_enable); +} - sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, itap, sdhci_am654->itap_del_ena[timing]); +static int sdhci_am654_platform_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, + u32 opcode) +{ + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); + struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); + unsigned char timing = host->mmc->ios.timing; + int itapdly; + do { + itapdly = sdhci_am654_do_tuning(host, opcode); + if (itapdly >= 0) + break; + } while (++sdhci_am654->tuning_loop < RETRY_TUNING_MAX); + + if (itapdly < 0) + return -1; + + sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, itapdly, sdhci_am654->itap_del_ena[timing]); /* Save ITAPDLY */ - sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing] = itap; + sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing] = itapdly; return 0; } @@ -742,6 +763,9 @@ static int sdhci_am654_init(struct sdhci_host *host) regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, CTL_CFG_3, TUNINGFORSDR50_MASK, TUNINGFORSDR50_MASK); + /* Use to re-execute tuning */ + sdhci_am654->tuning_loop = 0; + ret = sdhci_setup_host(host); if (ret) return ret;