Message ID | 1315243548-18664-11-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:55:32PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > > We will need to call iop->permission and iop->get_acl from > inode_change_ok() for additional permission checks, and both take a > non-const inode. OK, the essential difference being that richacls have a say in whether we can change attributes or not, which posix acls (for example) don't? --b. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > fs/attr.c | 2 +- > include/linux/fs.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/attr.c b/fs/attr.c > index 538e279..f15e9e3 100644 > --- a/fs/attr.c > +++ b/fs/attr.c > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > * Should be called as the first thing in ->setattr implementations, > * possibly after taking additional locks. > */ > -int inode_change_ok(const struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr) > +int inode_change_ok(struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr) > { > unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid; > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > index c5c98c5..8afb054 100644 > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > @@ -2568,7 +2568,7 @@ extern int buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *, > #define buffer_migrate_page NULL > #endif > > -extern int inode_change_ok(const struct inode *, struct iattr *); > +extern int inode_change_ok(struct inode *, struct iattr *); > extern int inode_newsize_ok(const struct inode *, loff_t offset); > extern void setattr_copy(struct inode *inode, const struct iattr *attr); > > -- > 1.7.4.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:43:22 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:55:32PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > > > > We will need to call iop->permission and iop->get_acl from > > inode_change_ok() for additional permission checks, and both take a > > non-const inode. > > OK, the essential difference being that richacls have a say in whether > we can change attributes or not, which posix acls (for example) don't? > yes, next patch explain the details of the check -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/attr.c b/fs/attr.c index 538e279..f15e9e3 100644 --- a/fs/attr.c +++ b/fs/attr.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * Should be called as the first thing in ->setattr implementations, * possibly after taking additional locks. */ -int inode_change_ok(const struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr) +int inode_change_ok(struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr) { unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid; diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index c5c98c5..8afb054 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -2568,7 +2568,7 @@ extern int buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *, #define buffer_migrate_page NULL #endif -extern int inode_change_ok(const struct inode *, struct iattr *); +extern int inode_change_ok(struct inode *, struct iattr *); extern int inode_newsize_ok(const struct inode *, loff_t offset); extern void setattr_copy(struct inode *inode, const struct iattr *attr);