From patchwork Tue Oct 30 18:45:58 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sasha Levin X-Patchwork-Id: 1672861 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-nfs@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC003FD2B for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965353Ab2J3SrF (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:47:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:59446 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965317Ab2J3SrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:47:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c26so2392069qad.19 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references; bh=Ou75DlKpENviGzEX2CIK/mJBTllqVrkSdHPInvlCcno=; b=I2JI+8TQ92PLQ4Z6LTzkBrUm4mMFalBct07SH4zAs7EmyMjf0vri0z/QXgi2ohLtGa DZu+ljb+pFC9bcSusi2hh49FHNpiOQ3hJ6fFPnYvvHmXlrk7NHhLFpCCf2PgyEnzXWlB G18Zq8B7MFZdgIPrmqwVucMhDX1Fu+LKu8qw4cAM5zdt44jPWdo/Dr1VkgyaoK/f+HmX /GJW3gZDCG+2DN9ut1t6If80Y+9UsmwN5F3B8OM3Il4fej/2xuiCFZ4NkNLeyGsb0FKk XTNmdqEMmIjD0SIwJ20FuVYzvAnNvoaw6Smykn/MpdyzDXYRTaCVUYVBYnd9TCRtfVIA /y0Q== Received: by 10.224.33.205 with SMTP id i13mr21311086qad.35.1351622820811; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.145.164.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga9sm682790qab.22.2012.10.30.11.46.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Sasha Levin To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, bfields@fieldses.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com, venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, ejt@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, lw@cn.fujitsu.com, Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH v8 02/16] userns: use new hashtable implementation Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:45:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1351622772-16400-2-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1351622772-16400-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> References: <1351622772-16400-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Switch to using the new hashtable implementation to store user structs. This reduces the amount of generic unrelated code in kernel/user.c. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/user.c | 33 ++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/user.c b/kernel/user.c index 750acff..f010389 100644 --- a/kernel/user.c +++ b/kernel/user.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include /* * userns count is 1 for root user, 1 for init_uts_ns, @@ -60,13 +61,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_user_ns); */ #define UIDHASH_BITS (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL ? 3 : 7) -#define UIDHASH_SZ (1 << UIDHASH_BITS) -#define UIDHASH_MASK (UIDHASH_SZ - 1) -#define __uidhashfn(uid) (((uid >> UIDHASH_BITS) + uid) & UIDHASH_MASK) -#define uidhashentry(uid) (uidhash_table + __uidhashfn((__kuid_val(uid)))) static struct kmem_cache *uid_cachep; -struct hlist_head uidhash_table[UIDHASH_SZ]; +static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(uidhash_table, UIDHASH_BITS); /* * The uidhash_lock is mostly taken from process context, but it is @@ -92,22 +89,22 @@ struct user_struct root_user = { /* * These routines must be called with the uidhash spinlock held! */ -static void uid_hash_insert(struct user_struct *up, struct hlist_head *hashent) +static void uid_hash_insert(struct user_struct *up) { - hlist_add_head(&up->uidhash_node, hashent); + hash_add(uidhash_table, &up->uidhash_node, __kuid_val(up->uid)); } static void uid_hash_remove(struct user_struct *up) { - hlist_del_init(&up->uidhash_node); + hash_del(&up->uidhash_node); } -static struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(kuid_t uid, struct hlist_head *hashent) +static struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(kuid_t uid) { struct user_struct *user; struct hlist_node *h; - hlist_for_each_entry(user, h, hashent, uidhash_node) { + hash_for_each_possible(uidhash_table, user, h, uidhash_node, __kuid_val(uid)) { if (uid_eq(user->uid, uid)) { atomic_inc(&user->__count); return user; @@ -143,7 +140,7 @@ struct user_struct *find_user(kuid_t uid) unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&uidhash_lock, flags); - ret = uid_hash_find(uid, uidhashentry(uid)); + ret = uid_hash_find(uid); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags); return ret; } @@ -164,11 +161,10 @@ void free_uid(struct user_struct *up) struct user_struct *alloc_uid(kuid_t uid) { - struct hlist_head *hashent = uidhashentry(uid); struct user_struct *up, *new; spin_lock_irq(&uidhash_lock); - up = uid_hash_find(uid, hashent); + up = uid_hash_find(uid); spin_unlock_irq(&uidhash_lock); if (!up) { @@ -184,13 +180,13 @@ struct user_struct *alloc_uid(kuid_t uid) * on adding the same user already.. */ spin_lock_irq(&uidhash_lock); - up = uid_hash_find(uid, hashent); + up = uid_hash_find(uid); if (up) { key_put(new->uid_keyring); key_put(new->session_keyring); kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, new); } else { - uid_hash_insert(new, hashent); + uid_hash_insert(new); up = new; } spin_unlock_irq(&uidhash_lock); @@ -204,17 +200,12 @@ out_unlock: static int __init uid_cache_init(void) { - int n; - uid_cachep = kmem_cache_create("uid_cache", sizeof(struct user_struct), 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_PANIC, NULL); - for(n = 0; n < UIDHASH_SZ; ++n) - INIT_HLIST_HEAD(uidhash_table + n); - /* Insert the root user immediately (init already runs as root) */ spin_lock_irq(&uidhash_lock); - uid_hash_insert(&root_user, uidhashentry(GLOBAL_ROOT_UID)); + uid_hash_insert(&root_user); spin_unlock_irq(&uidhash_lock); return 0;