diff mbox

[2/7] nfsd4: need to destroy revoked delegations in destroy_client

Message ID 1383039552-27209-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@primarydata.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Benny Halevy Oct. 29, 2013, 9:39 a.m. UTC
[use list_splice_init]
Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

J. Bruce Fields Oct. 29, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC | #1
Whoops, yes, looks like a good fix.

I'm not convinced of the need for the recall_lock here for reasons given
before.  Could you just drop the recall_lock here and resend?

--b.

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:39:12AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> [use list_splice_init]
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index a403502..a66b0ad 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -1129,6 +1129,13 @@ static struct nfs4_client *alloc_client(struct xdr_netobj name)
>  		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
>  		destroy_delegation(dp);
>  	}
> +	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
> +	list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
> +	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
> +	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> +		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> +		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
> +	}
>  	while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_openowners)) {
>  		oo = list_entry(clp->cl_openowners.next, struct nfs4_openowner, oo_perclient);
>  		release_openowner(oo);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
J. Bruce Fields Oct. 29, 2013, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:04:14AM -0400, bfields wrote:
> Whoops, yes, looks like a good fix.
> 
> I'm not convinced of the need for the recall_lock here for reasons given
> before.  Could you just drop the recall_lock here and resend?

Actually never mind I've done that on my local tree.  I'll wait to push
it out till you've had a chance to object.

--b.

> 
> --b.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:39:12AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> > [use list_splice_init]
> > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index a403502..a66b0ad 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -1129,6 +1129,13 @@ static struct nfs4_client *alloc_client(struct xdr_netobj name)
> >  		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> >  		destroy_delegation(dp);
> >  	}
> > +	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
> > +	list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
> > +	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
> > +	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > +		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> > +		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
> > +	}
> >  	while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_openowners)) {
> >  		oo = list_entry(clp->cl_openowners.next, struct nfs4_openowner, oo_perclient);
> >  		release_openowner(oo);
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Benny Halevy Oct. 30, 2013, 2:07 p.m. UTC | #3
On 2013-10-29 18:02, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:04:14AM -0400, bfields wrote:
>> Whoops, yes, looks like a good fix.
>>
>> I'm not convinced of the need for the recall_lock here for reasons given
>> before.  Could you just drop the recall_lock here and resend?
> 
> Actually never mind I've done that on my local tree.  I'll wait to push
> it out till you've had a chance to object.

no objection. thanks.

> 
> --b.
> 
>>
>> --b.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:39:12AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>> [use list_splice_init]
>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 7 +++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>> index a403502..a66b0ad 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>> @@ -1129,6 +1129,13 @@ static struct nfs4_client *alloc_client(struct xdr_netobj name)
>>>  		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
>>>  		destroy_delegation(dp);
>>>  	}
>>> +	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
>>> +	list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
>>> +	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>>> +	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
>>> +		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
>>> +		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
>>> +	}
>>>  	while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_openowners)) {
>>>  		oo = list_entry(clp->cl_openowners.next, struct nfs4_openowner, oo_perclient);
>>>  		release_openowner(oo);
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index a403502..a66b0ad 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -1129,6 +1129,13 @@  static struct nfs4_client *alloc_client(struct xdr_netobj name)
 		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
 		destroy_delegation(dp);
 	}
+	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
+	list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
+	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
+	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
+		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
+	}
 	while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_openowners)) {
 		oo = list_entry(clp->cl_openowners.next, struct nfs4_openowner, oo_perclient);
 		release_openowner(oo);