@@ -6534,7 +6534,7 @@ nfs4_transform_lock_offset(struct file_lock *lock)
}
static fl_owner_t
-nfsd4_fl_get_owner(fl_owner_t owner)
+nfsd4_lm_get_owner(fl_owner_t owner)
{
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *)owner;
@@ -6543,7 +6543,7 @@ nfsd4_fl_get_owner(fl_owner_t owner)
}
static void
-nfsd4_fl_put_owner(fl_owner_t owner)
+nfsd4_lm_put_owner(fl_owner_t owner)
{
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *)owner;
@@ -6578,8 +6578,8 @@ nfsd4_lm_notify(struct file_lock *fl)
static const struct lock_manager_operations nfsd_posix_mng_ops = {
.lm_notify = nfsd4_lm_notify,
- .lm_get_owner = nfsd4_fl_get_owner,
- .lm_put_owner = nfsd4_fl_put_owner,
+ .lm_get_owner = nfsd4_lm_get_owner,
+ .lm_put_owner = nfsd4_lm_put_owner,
};
static inline void
The common practice is to name function instances the same as the method names, but with a uniquifying prefix. Commit aef9583b234a ("NFSD: Get reference of lockowner when coping file_lock") missed this -- the new function names should both have been of the form "nfsd4_lm_*". Before more _lm_ functions are added in NFSD, rename these two functions for consistency. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)