Message ID | 20131015210316.GA11616@fieldses.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:03:16PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> > > This check was added by Al Viro with > d9e80b7de91db05c1c4d2e5ebbfd70b3b3ba0e0f "nfs d_revalidate() is too > trigger-happy with d_drop()", with the explanation that we don't want to > remove the root of a disconnected tree, which will still be included on > the s_anon list. > > But DCACHE_DISCONNECTED does *not* actually identify dentries that are > disconnected from the dentry tree or hashed on s_anon. IS_ROOT() is the > way to do that. > > Also add a comment from Al's commit to remind us why this check is > there. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c index de434f3..2acc77a 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c @@ -1139,7 +1139,13 @@ out_zap_parent: if (inode && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { /* Purge readdir caches. */ nfs_zap_caches(inode); - if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED) + /* + * We can't d_drop the root of a disconnected tree: + * its d_hash is on the s_anon list and d_drop() would hide + * it from shrink_dcache_for_unmount(), leading to busy + * inodes on unmount and further oopses. + */ + if (IS_ROOT(dentry)) goto out_valid; } /* If we have submounts, don't unhash ! */