diff mbox

nfs: handle servers that support only ALLOW ACE type.

Message ID 20140124185652.GA15292@us.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

malahal naineni Jan. 24, 2014, 6:56 p.m. UTC 
Trond Myklebust [trondmy@gmail.com] wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 11:19 -0600, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> > Currently we support ACLs if the NFS server file system supports both
> > ALLOW and DENY ACE types. This patch makes the Linux client work with
> > ACLs even if the server supports only 'ALLOW' ACE type.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > index 15052b8..e3b8fa6 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > @@ -4321,9 +4321,8 @@ static int nfs4_proc_renew(struct nfs_client *clp, struct rpc_cred *cred)
> >  
> >  static inline int nfs4_server_supports_acls(struct nfs_server *server)
> >  {
> > -	return (server->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS)
> > -		&& (server->acl_bitmask & ACL4_SUPPORT_ALLOW_ACL)
> > -		&& (server->acl_bitmask & ACL4_SUPPORT_DENY_ACL);
> > +	return server->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS &&
> > +		server->acl_bitmask & ACL4_SUPPORT_ALLOW_ACL;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* Assuming that XATTR_SIZE_MAX is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, and that
> 
> Wait... Having looked at the code a bit more carefully. Is there any
> reason to set NFS_CAP_ACLS at all if we don't see server->acl_bitmask &
> ACL4_SUPPORT_ALLOW_ACL?

I don't see any. Something like the attached patch should work!

Regards, Malahal.
diff mbox

Patch

From 7b949e7906d40704c4ae28a06f4c501161cb5a99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 08:54:55 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] nfs: handle servers that support only ALLOW ACE type.

Currently we support ACLs if the NFS server file system supports both
ALLOW and DENY ACE types. This patch makes the Linux client work with
ACLs even if the server supports only 'ALLOW' ACE type.

Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 15052b8..b007559 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2744,7 +2744,8 @@  static int _nfs4_server_capabilities(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *f
 				NFS_CAP_OWNER_GROUP|NFS_CAP_ATIME|
 				NFS_CAP_CTIME|NFS_CAP_MTIME|
 				NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL);
-		if (res.attr_bitmask[0] & FATTR4_WORD0_ACL)
+		if (res.attr_bitmask[0] & FATTR4_WORD0_ACL &&
+				res.acl_bitmask & ACL4_SUPPORT_ALLOW_ACL)
 			server->caps |= NFS_CAP_ACLS;
 		if (res.has_links != 0)
 			server->caps |= NFS_CAP_HARDLINKS;
@@ -4321,9 +4322,7 @@  static int nfs4_proc_renew(struct nfs_client *clp, struct rpc_cred *cred)
 
 static inline int nfs4_server_supports_acls(struct nfs_server *server)
 {
-	return (server->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS)
-		&& (server->acl_bitmask & ACL4_SUPPORT_ALLOW_ACL)
-		&& (server->acl_bitmask & ACL4_SUPPORT_DENY_ACL);
+	return server->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS;
 }
 
 /* Assuming that XATTR_SIZE_MAX is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, and that
-- 
1.8.3.1