Message ID | 20170509133121.26529-1-colin.king@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:31:21PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c > index 1dbf62190bee..c453a1998e00 100644 > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c > @@ -1259,7 +1259,8 @@ nfsd4_layout_verify(struct svc_export *exp, unsigned int layout_type) > return NULL; > } > > - if (layout_type >= 32 || !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) { > + if (layout_type >= LAYOUT_TYPE_MAX || > + !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) { The 32 is there to prevent a shift wrapping bug. The bit test prevents a buffer overflow so this can't actually overflow. But this change doesn't hurt and is probably cleaner. exp->ex_layout_types is set in nfsd4_setup_layout_type(). regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c index 1dbf62190bee..c453a1998e00 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c @@ -1259,7 +1259,8 @@ nfsd4_layout_verify(struct svc_export *exp, unsigned int layout_type) return NULL; } - if (layout_type >= 32 || !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) { + if (layout_type >= LAYOUT_TYPE_MAX || + !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) { dprintk("%s: layout type %d not supported\n", __func__, layout_type); return NULL;