Message ID | 20240715105836.6d6e6e50@canb.auug.org.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the mm-stable tree | expand |
Hi all, On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:58:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got conflicts in: > > fs/nfs/nfstrace.h > fs/nfs/write.c > > between commit: > > 237d29075ca7 ("nfs: drop usage of folio_file_pos") > > from the mm-stable tree and commit: > > 64568b27b2d2 ("nfs: pass explicit offset/count to trace events") > > from the nfs-anna tree. > > I fixed it up (for the nfstrace.h file I just used the latter, and see > below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as > linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned > to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. > You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc fs/nfs/write.c > index 3573cdc4b28f,680505d664f0..000000000000 > --- a/fs/nfs/write.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c > @@@ -279,9 -180,9 +180,9 @@@ static void nfs_grow_file(struct folio > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); > i_size = i_size_read(inode); > end_index = ((i_size - 1) >> folio_shift(folio)) << folio_order(folio); > - if (i_size > 0 && folio_index(folio) < end_index) > + if (i_size > 0 && folio->index < end_index) > goto out; > - end = folio_file_pos(folio) + (loff_t)offset + (loff_t)count; > + end = folio_pos(folio) + (loff_t)offset + (loff_t)count; > if (i_size >= end) > goto out; > trace_nfs_size_grow(inode, end); > @@@ -2073,8 -2062,8 +2062,8 @@@ int nfs_wb_folio_cancel(struct inode *i > */ > int nfs_wb_folio(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio) > { > - loff_t range_start = folio_file_pos(folio); > + loff_t range_start = folio_pos(folio); > - loff_t range_end = range_start + (loff_t)folio_size(folio) - 1; > + size_t len = folio_size(folio); > struct writeback_control wbc = { > .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL, > .nr_to_write = 0, Due to commit 564a2ee9f9f6 ("mm: remove page_file_offset and folio_file_pos") in the mm-stable tree, this also required the following merge fix patch: From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 11:23:30 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "nfs: pass explicit offset/count to trace events" interacting with commit 564a2ee9f9f6 ("mm: remove page_file_offset and folio_file_pos") from the mm-stable tree. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> --- fs/nfs/read.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c index 6355a777e428..a6103333b666 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/read.c +++ b/fs/nfs/read.c @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int nfs_do_read_folio(struct file *file, struct folio *folio) int nfs_read_folio(struct file *file, struct folio *folio) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); - loff_t pos = folio_file_pos(folio); + loff_t pos = folio_pos(folio); size_t len = folio_size(folio); int ret;
Thanks Stephen, the fix looks good. Anna, given that the commit is near the head of your branch I can resend (or you can just fix up directy) to use folio_pos instead of folio_file_pos to avoid the harder to fix part of the conflict.
diff --cc fs/nfs/write.c index 3573cdc4b28f,680505d664f0..000000000000 --- a/fs/nfs/write.c