From patchwork Thu Aug 22 13:39:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: lizetao X-Patchwork-Id: 13773435 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9121CBEB1; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724333501; cv=none; b=gEOF4TzrcibuBEkY8VQvvbN34sAR9XX6+z9LUmQ6k+iqSGs2nwRGQxRcvMpkg9AjNmIMqLCYu4ObCC+SEWLETRBaZ42R/CbnsGL07r4/Z6uMeY47NbKT9rFmPo0/cUc/PJH1xmXLIIB5G0Y6VnYnACmhuhk6IEv+H5JM2OW9m8s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724333501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pfQnEsmFpxURztmKAKTGTjicEIdByeH+xqzYCEcJRGA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P14u2MUGQnP/O+vG//P5ULUtMVbU1C448CpGEOvlsqQGCJor9lMcxfLJr7UzetdoOvEB6MkvVBHz8qyxDuqjbIdZYwCVjnBQUZJiRQ6rw9uudtWU4DkYxQjCdKKs2Z7VO2OUkkckEqb2SgqiqEKlmRRIXj1Ko0qVibCDYKe+gjo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.48]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WqPH55FWfzyRG0; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 21:31:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.25]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF19180087; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 21:31:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.34; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 21:31:36 +0800 From: Li Zetao To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/8] ipv6: mcast: use min() to simplify the code Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 21:39:06 +0800 Message-ID: <20240822133908.1042240-7-lizetao1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240822133908.1042240-1-lizetao1@huawei.com> References: <20240822133908.1042240-1-lizetao1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.25) When coping sockaddr in ip6_mc_msfget(), the time of copies depends on the minimum value between sl_count and gf_numsrc. Using min() here is very semantic. Signed-off-by: Li Zetao Reviewed-by: Simon Horman --- net/ipv6/mcast.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/mcast.c b/net/ipv6/mcast.c index 7ba01d8cfbae..b244dbf61d5f 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/mcast.c +++ b/net/ipv6/mcast.c @@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ int ip6_mc_msfget(struct sock *sk, struct group_filter *gsf, const struct in6_addr *group; struct ipv6_mc_socklist *pmc; struct ip6_sf_socklist *psl; - int i, count, copycount; + unsigned int count; + int i, copycount; group = &((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&gsf->gf_group)->sin6_addr; @@ -610,7 +611,7 @@ int ip6_mc_msfget(struct sock *sk, struct group_filter *gsf, psl = sock_dereference(pmc->sflist, sk); count = psl ? psl->sl_count : 0; - copycount = count < gsf->gf_numsrc ? count : gsf->gf_numsrc; + copycount = min(count, gsf->gf_numsrc); gsf->gf_numsrc = count; for (i = 0; i < copycount; i++) { struct sockaddr_in6 *psin6;