@@ -499,8 +499,8 @@ enum pnfs_iomode {
};
enum pnfs_notify_deviceid_type4 {
- NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE = 1 << 1,
- NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE = 1 << 2,
+ NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE = 1,
+ NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE = 2,
};
#define NFL4_UFLG_MASK 0x0000003F
From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Marc Eshel/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS,
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: 12/07/2012 03:45 PM
Subject: RE: notify_deviceid_type4
Hi Marc,
I’ve been waiting for a patch from you for this (I saw your original bug
report). Could you please resend with a formal changelog entry and
signed-off-by line? I know that would make your legal colleagues in IBM
very happy. J
Cheers
Trond
From: Marc Eshel [mailto:eshel@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 12:33 AM
To: Myklebust, Trond
Cc: J. Bruce Fields; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org;
linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: notify_deviceid_type4
Trond, can you please apply the following patch so we are in compliance
with the spec.
Thanks, Marc.
@@ -499,8 +499,8 @@ enum pnfs_iomode {
};
enum pnfs_notify_deviceid_type4 {
- NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE = 1 << 1,
- NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE = 1 << 2,
+ NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE = 1,
+ NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE = 2,
};
#define NFL4_UFLG_MASK 0x0000003F