Message ID | 158300760415.2141307.14060353322051900501.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=kIc1=4R=lists.01.org=linux-nvdimm-bounces@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1DD930 for <patchwork-linux-nvdimm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8FCC2082E for <patchwork-linux-nvdimm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:36:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C8FCC2082E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5B610FC3160; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.100; helo=mga07.intel.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 288341007B185 for <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:37:01 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Feb 2020 12:36:09 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,501,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="232628648" Received: from dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com (HELO dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.54.39.16]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Feb 2020 12:36:09 -0800 Subject: [ndctl PATCH 00/36] Multiple topics / backlog for v68 From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:20:04 -0800 Message-ID: <158300760415.2141307.14060353322051900501.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.18-3-g996c MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: UM2XVCXF5ODEQVCZEHOLLD5BLELB3PZU X-Message-ID-Hash: UM2XVCXF5ODEQVCZEHOLLD5BLELB3PZU X-MailFrom: dan.j.williams@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Michal Biesek <michal.biesek@intel.com>, Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." <linux-nvdimm.lists.01.org> Archived-At: <https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org/message/UM2XVCXF5ODEQVCZEHOLLD5BLELB3PZU/> List-Archive: <https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org/> List-Help: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request@lists.01.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-join@lists.01.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
Series |
Multiple topics / backlog for v68
|
expand
|
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 12:20 -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Changes from review: > - Add NDCTL_LIST_LINT to not regress list output (Jeff) > - Add kernel-doc description for ndctl_region_set_align() (Jeff) > > --- > > About half of these have been posted previously, but have been reworked > and revised as they have percolated in my tree relative to other > arriving features. Yes, it is quite a lot to ingest at once, but given > the interdependencies and need to catch up I decided to post it all > together. > > The recommendation on how to review is to start with the new tests, > those introduce some new commands, and those new commands introduce some > new library routines. The rest are miscellaneous updates, fixes, and > cleanups. > This all looks good to me - you can add: Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>