From patchwork Tue Sep 26 22:45:37 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dan Williams X-Patchwork-Id: 9972809 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E40360365 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE3628FF7 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 1F98829004; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:52:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C601D28FF7 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C70421F322BB; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:48:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.88; helo=mga01.intel.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8430121F322A9 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Sep 2017 15:52:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.42,441,1500966000"; d="scan'208"; a="1176116098" Received: from dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com (HELO dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.54.39.125]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2017 15:52:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] libnvdimm, namespace: fix label initialization to use valid seq numbers From: Dan Williams To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:45:37 -0700 Message-ID: <150646593710.6049.14872100814913109721.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-9-g687f MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The set of valid sequence numbers is {1,2,3}. The specification indicates that an implementation should consider 0 a sign of a critical error: UEFI 2.7: 13.19 NVDIMM Label Protocol Software never writes the sequence number 00, so a correctly check-summed Index Block with this sequence number probably indicates a critical error. When software discovers this case it treats it as an invalid Index Block indication. While the expectation is that the invalid block is just thrown away, the Robustness Principle says we should fix this to make both sequence numbers valid. Fixes: f524bf271a5c ("libnvdimm: write pmem label set") Cc: Reported-by: Juston Li Signed-off-by: Dan Williams --- drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c index 9c5f108910e3..de66c02f6140 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static int init_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, int num_labels) nsindex = to_namespace_index(ndd, 0); memset(nsindex, 0, ndd->nsarea.config_size); for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { - int rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, i, i*2, ND_NSINDEX_INIT); + int rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, i, 3 - i, ND_NSINDEX_INIT); if (rc) return rc;