Message ID | 1533739821-9864-1-git-send-email-oceanhehy@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: nfit: check dcr immediately following its assignment codes | expand |
On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 10:50 -0400, Ocean He wrote: > From: Ocean He <hehy1@lenovo.com> > > In commit 6697b2cf69d43632 ("nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, > acpi6.1 compatibility"), the check codes of dcr were just following its > assignment codes. But they were separated by commit ad9ac5e1957531a8 > ("nfit: always associate flush hints"). > > Just change the check codes back to original position, without function > change. > > Signed-off-by: Ocean He <hehy1@lenovo.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) This seems like unnecessary churn. Does it cause any problems in practice? > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > index 7c47900..c9e4c9a 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > @@ -1078,6 +1078,12 @@ static int __nfit_mem_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc, > break; > } > > + if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) { > + dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n", > + spa->range_index, dcr); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > list_for_each_entry(nfit_flush, &acpi_desc->flushes, list) { > struct acpi_nfit_flush_address *flush; > u16 i; > @@ -1101,12 +1107,6 @@ static int __nfit_mem_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc, > break; > } > > - if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) { > - dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n", > - spa->range_index, dcr); > - return -ENODEV; > - } > - > if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) { > struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt; > u16 idt_idx;
> -----Original Message----- > From: Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 1:43 AM > To: Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com; > oceanhehy@gmail.com; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; lenb@kernel.org; > rjw@rjwysocki.net > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; linux- > acpi@vger.kernel.org; Ocean HY1 He <hehy1@lenovo.com> > Subject: [External] Re: [PATCH] ACPI: nfit: check dcr immediately following its > assignment codes > > > On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 10:50 -0400, Ocean He wrote: > > From: Ocean He <hehy1@lenovo.com> > > > > In commit 6697b2cf69d43632 ("nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, > > acpi6.1 compatibility"), the check codes of dcr were just following its > > assignment codes. But they were separated by commit ad9ac5e1957531a8 > > ("nfit: always associate flush hints"). > > > > Just change the check codes back to original position, without function > > change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ocean He <hehy1@lenovo.com> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > This seems like unnecessary churn. Does it cause any problems in > practice? > The original codes do not cause any problems. Ocean. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > > index 7c47900..c9e4c9a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > > @@ -1078,6 +1078,12 @@ static int __nfit_mem_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc > *acpi_desc, > > break; > > } > > > > + if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) { > > + dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n", > > + spa->range_index, dcr); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > + > > list_for_each_entry(nfit_flush, &acpi_desc->flushes, list) { > > struct acpi_nfit_flush_address *flush; > > u16 i; > > @@ -1101,12 +1107,6 @@ static int __nfit_mem_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc > *acpi_desc, > > break; > > } > > > > - if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) { > > - dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n", > > - spa->range_index, dcr); > > - return -ENODEV; > > - } > > - > > if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) { > > struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt; > > u16 idt_idx;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c index 7c47900..c9e4c9a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c @@ -1078,6 +1078,12 @@ static int __nfit_mem_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc, break; } + if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) { + dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n", + spa->range_index, dcr); + return -ENODEV; + } + list_for_each_entry(nfit_flush, &acpi_desc->flushes, list) { struct acpi_nfit_flush_address *flush; u16 i; @@ -1101,12 +1107,6 @@ static int __nfit_mem_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc, break; } - if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) { - dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n", - spa->range_index, dcr); - return -ENODEV; - } - if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) { struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt; u16 idt_idx;