From patchwork Mon Nov 5 21:19:35 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexander Duyck X-Patchwork-Id: 10669181 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35BF1751 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA11129C30 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id CE4CC29C5E; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52CE829C30 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A992118B7A7; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:19:38 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.120; helo=mga04.intel.com; envelope-from=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C9221B02822 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:19:36 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2018 13:19:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,469,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="97840072" Received: from ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com ([10.7.198.76]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2018 13:19:35 -0800 Subject: [mm PATCH v5 2/7] mm: Drop meminit_pfn_in_nid as it is redundant From: Alexander Duyck To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:19:35 -0800 Message-ID: <154145277561.30046.12617658691920831062.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <154145268025.30046.11742652345962594283.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> References: <154145268025.30046.11742652345962594283.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/unknown-version MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, khalid.aziz@oracle.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vbabka@suse.cz, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, davem@davemloft.net, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP As best as I can tell the meminit_pfn_in_nid call is completely redundant. The deferred memory initialization is already making use of for_each_free_mem_range which in turn will call into __next_mem_range which will only return a memory range if it matches the node ID provided assuming it is not NUMA_NO_NODE. I am operating on the assumption that there are no zones or pgdata_t structures that have a NUMA node of NUMA_NO_NODE associated with them. If that is the case then __next_mem_range will never return a memory range that doesn't match the zone's node ID and as such the check is redundant. So one piece I would like to verify on this is if this works for ia64. Technically it was using a different approach to get the node ID, but it seems to have the node ID also encoded into the memblock. So I am assuming this is okay, but would like to get confirmation on that. On my x86_64 test system with 384GB of memory per node I saw a reduction in initialization time from 2.80s to 1.85s as a result of this patch. Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin Acked-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck --- mm/page_alloc.c | 51 ++++++++++++++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index ae31839874b8..be1197c120a8 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -1301,36 +1301,22 @@ int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES -static inline bool __meminit __maybe_unused -meminit_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int node, - struct mminit_pfnnid_cache *state) +/* Only safe to use early in boot when initialisation is single-threaded */ +static inline bool __meminit early_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int node) { int nid; - nid = __early_pfn_to_nid(pfn, state); + nid = __early_pfn_to_nid(pfn, &early_pfnnid_cache); if (nid >= 0 && nid != node) return false; return true; } -/* Only safe to use early in boot when initialisation is single-threaded */ -static inline bool __meminit early_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int node) -{ - return meminit_pfn_in_nid(pfn, node, &early_pfnnid_cache); -} - #else - static inline bool __meminit early_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int node) { return true; } -static inline bool __meminit __maybe_unused -meminit_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int node, - struct mminit_pfnnid_cache *state) -{ - return true; -} #endif @@ -1459,21 +1445,13 @@ static inline void __init pgdat_init_report_one_done(void) * * Then, we check if a current large page is valid by only checking the validity * of the head pfn. - * - * Finally, meminit_pfn_in_nid is checked on systems where pfns can interleave - * within a node: a pfn is between start and end of a node, but does not belong - * to this memory node. */ -static inline bool __init -deferred_pfn_valid(int nid, unsigned long pfn, - struct mminit_pfnnid_cache *nid_init_state) +static inline bool __init deferred_pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) { if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn)) return false; if (!(pfn & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1)) && !pfn_valid(pfn)) return false; - if (!meminit_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid, nid_init_state)) - return false; return true; } @@ -1481,15 +1459,14 @@ deferred_pfn_valid(int nid, unsigned long pfn, * Free pages to buddy allocator. Try to free aligned pages in * pageblock_nr_pages sizes. */ -static void __init deferred_free_pages(int nid, int zid, unsigned long pfn, +static void __init deferred_free_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) { - struct mminit_pfnnid_cache nid_init_state = { }; unsigned long nr_pgmask = pageblock_nr_pages - 1; unsigned long nr_free = 0; for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) { - if (!deferred_pfn_valid(nid, pfn, &nid_init_state)) { + if (!deferred_pfn_valid(pfn)) { deferred_free_range(pfn - nr_free, nr_free); nr_free = 0; } else if (!(pfn & nr_pgmask)) { @@ -1509,17 +1486,18 @@ static void __init deferred_free_pages(int nid, int zid, unsigned long pfn, * by performing it only once every pageblock_nr_pages. * Return number of pages initialized. */ -static unsigned long __init deferred_init_pages(int nid, int zid, +static unsigned long __init deferred_init_pages(struct zone *zone, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) { - struct mminit_pfnnid_cache nid_init_state = { }; unsigned long nr_pgmask = pageblock_nr_pages - 1; + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone); unsigned long nr_pages = 0; + int zid = zone_idx(zone); struct page *page = NULL; for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) { - if (!deferred_pfn_valid(nid, pfn, &nid_init_state)) { + if (!deferred_pfn_valid(pfn)) { page = NULL; continue; } else if (!page || !(pfn & nr_pgmask)) { @@ -1582,12 +1560,12 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &spa, &epa, NULL) { spfn = max_t(unsigned long, first_init_pfn, PFN_UP(spa)); epfn = min_t(unsigned long, zone_end_pfn(zone), PFN_DOWN(epa)); - nr_pages += deferred_init_pages(nid, zid, spfn, epfn); + nr_pages += deferred_init_pages(zone, spfn, epfn); } for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &spa, &epa, NULL) { spfn = max_t(unsigned long, first_init_pfn, PFN_UP(spa)); epfn = min_t(unsigned long, zone_end_pfn(zone), PFN_DOWN(epa)); - deferred_free_pages(nid, zid, spfn, epfn); + deferred_free_pages(spfn, epfn); } pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); @@ -1626,7 +1604,6 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(deferred_pages); static noinline bool __init deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) { - int zid = zone_idx(zone); int nid = zone_to_nid(zone); pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid); unsigned long nr_pages_needed = ALIGN(1 << order, PAGES_PER_SECTION); @@ -1676,7 +1653,7 @@ deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) while (spfn < epfn && nr_pages < nr_pages_needed) { t = ALIGN(spfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION, PAGES_PER_SECTION); first_deferred_pfn = min(t, epfn); - nr_pages += deferred_init_pages(nid, zid, spfn, + nr_pages += deferred_init_pages(zone, spfn, first_deferred_pfn); spfn = first_deferred_pfn; } @@ -1688,7 +1665,7 @@ deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &spa, &epa, NULL) { spfn = max_t(unsigned long, first_init_pfn, PFN_UP(spa)); epfn = min_t(unsigned long, first_deferred_pfn, PFN_DOWN(epa)); - deferred_free_pages(nid, zid, spfn, epfn); + deferred_free_pages(spfn, epfn); if (first_deferred_pfn == epfn) break;