From patchwork Mon Nov 5 21:19:56 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexander Duyck X-Patchwork-Id: 10669197 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4403F15A6 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B58C29C30 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 2EEED29C5E; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF35629C30 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD4B2118B7B1; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:19:57 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.24; helo=mga09.intel.com; envelope-from=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDC921183EE9 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:19:56 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2018 13:19:56 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,469,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="247211874" Received: from ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com ([10.7.198.76]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2018 13:19:56 -0800 Subject: [mm PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Add reserved flag setting to set_page_links From: Alexander Duyck To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:19:56 -0800 Message-ID: <154145279604.30046.5646399488589213615.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <154145268025.30046.11742652345962594283.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> References: <154145268025.30046.11742652345962594283.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/unknown-version MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, khalid.aziz@oracle.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vbabka@suse.cz, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, davem@davemloft.net, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This patch modifies the set_page_links function to include the setting of the reserved flag via a simple AND and OR operation. The motivation for this is the fact that the existing __set_bit call still seems to have effects on performance as replacing the call with the AND and OR can reduce initialization time. Looking over the assembly code before and after the change the main difference between the two is that the reserved bit is stored in a value that is generated outside of the main initialization loop and is then written with the other flags field values in one write to the page->flags value. Previously the generated value was written and then then a btsq instruction was issued. On my x86_64 test system with 3TB of persistent memory per node I saw the persistent memory initialization time on average drop from 23.49s to 19.12s per node. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin --- include/linux/mm.h | 9 ++++++++- mm/page_alloc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 288c407c08fc..de6535a98e45 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1171,11 +1171,18 @@ static inline void set_page_node(struct page *page, unsigned long node) page->flags |= (node & NODES_MASK) << NODES_PGSHIFT; } +static inline void set_page_reserved(struct page *page, bool reserved) +{ + page->flags &= ~(1ul << PG_reserved); + page->flags |= (unsigned long)(!!reserved) << PG_reserved; +} + static inline void set_page_links(struct page *page, enum zone_type zone, - unsigned long node, unsigned long pfn) + unsigned long node, unsigned long pfn, bool reserved) { set_page_zone(page, zone); set_page_node(page, node); + set_page_reserved(page, reserved); #ifdef SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS set_page_section(page, pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)); #endif diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index dbe00c1a0e23..9eb993a9be99 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ static void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone, int nid) { mm_zero_struct_page(page); - set_page_links(page, zone, nid, pfn); + set_page_links(page, zone, nid, pfn, false); init_page_count(page); page_mapcount_reset(page); page_cpupid_reset_last(page); @@ -1195,7 +1195,8 @@ static void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, static void __meminit __init_pageblock(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, unsigned long zone, int nid, - struct dev_pagemap *pgmap) + struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, + bool is_reserved) { unsigned long nr_pgmask = pageblock_nr_pages - 1; struct page *start_page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn); @@ -1231,18 +1232,15 @@ static void __meminit __init_pageblock(unsigned long start_pfn, * call because of the fact that the pfn number is used to * get the section_nr and this function should not be * spanning more than a single section. + * + * We can use a non-atomic operation for setting the + * PG_reserved flag as we are still initializing the pages. */ - set_page_links(page, zone, nid, start_pfn); + set_page_links(page, zone, nid, start_pfn, is_reserved); init_page_count(page); page_mapcount_reset(page); page_cpupid_reset_last(page); - /* - * We can use the non-atomic __set_bit operation for setting - * the flag as we are still initializing the pages. - */ - __SetPageReserved(page); - /* * ZONE_DEVICE pages union ->lru with a ->pgmap back * pointer and hmm_data. It is a bug if a ZONE_DEVICE @@ -5612,7 +5610,18 @@ static void __meminit __memmap_init_hotplug(unsigned long size, int nid, pfn = max(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn - 1, pageblock_nr_pages), start_pfn); stride -= pfn; - __init_pageblock(pfn, stride, zone, nid, pgmap); + /* + * The last argument of __init_pageblock is a boolean + * value indicating if the page will be marked as reserved. + * + * Mark page reserved as it will need to wait for onlining + * phase for it to be fully associated with a zone. + * + * Under certain circumstances ZONE_DEVICE pages may not + * need to be marked as reserved, however there is still + * code that is depending on this being set for now. + */ + __init_pageblock(pfn, stride, zone, nid, pgmap, true); cond_resched(); }