| Message ID | 165791935297.2491387.8950514630973579122.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Introduce security commands for CXL pmem device | expand |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:09:12 -0700 Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote: > Add support to emulate a CXL mem device support the "Disable Passphrase" > operation. The operation supports disabling of either a user or a master > passphrase. The emulation will provide support for both user and master > passphrase. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Similar comments as for earlier test patches. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c > index 796f4f7b5e3d..5f87a94d92ae 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c > +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c > @@ -235,6 +235,83 @@ static int mock_set_passphrase(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd > return 0; > } > > +static int mock_disable_passphrase(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd) > +{ > + struct mock_mdev_data *mdata = dev_get_drvdata(cxlds->dev); > + struct cxl_disable_pass *dis_pass; > + > + if (cmd->size_in != sizeof(*dis_pass)) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT; Same as in earlier patches. I think return code is wrong and not seeing why it's useful to set it. > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (cmd->size_out != 0) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT; > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_FROZEN) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + dis_pass = cmd->payload_in; > + switch (dis_pass->type) { > + case CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_MASTER: > + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PLIMIT) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + if (!(mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PASS_SET)) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + if (memcmp(dis_pass->pass, mdata->master_pass, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN)) { > + if (++mdata->master_limit == PASS_TRY_LIMIT) > + mdata->security_state |= CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PLIMIT; > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_PASSPHRASE; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + mdata->master_limit = 0; > + memset(mdata->master_pass, 0, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN); > + mdata->security_state &= ~CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PASS_SET; > + break; > + > + case CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_USER: > + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PLIMIT) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + if (!(mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET)) { > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + if (memcmp(dis_pass->pass, mdata->user_pass, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN)) { > + if (++mdata->user_limit == PASS_TRY_LIMIT) > + mdata->security_state |= CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PLIMIT; > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_PASSPHRASE; > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + > + mdata->user_limit = 0; > + memset(mdata->user_pass, 0, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN); > + mdata->security_state &= ~(CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET | > + CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_LOCKED); > + break; Similar comment to before. I'd return 0 here and in above case to slightly improve readability. > + > + default: > + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT; > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int mock_get_lsa(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd) > { > struct cxl_mbox_get_lsa *get_lsa = cmd->payload_in; > @@ -333,6 +410,9 @@ static int cxl_mock_mbox_send(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd * > case CXL_MBOX_OP_SET_PASSPHRASE: > rc = mock_set_passphrase(cxlds, cmd); > break; > + case CXL_MBOX_OP_DISABLE_PASSPHRASE: > + rc = mock_disable_passphrase(cxlds, cmd); > + break; > default: > break; > } > >
diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c index 796f4f7b5e3d..5f87a94d92ae 100644 --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c @@ -235,6 +235,83 @@ static int mock_set_passphrase(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd return 0; } +static int mock_disable_passphrase(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd) +{ + struct mock_mdev_data *mdata = dev_get_drvdata(cxlds->dev); + struct cxl_disable_pass *dis_pass; + + if (cmd->size_in != sizeof(*dis_pass)) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT; + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (cmd->size_out != 0) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT; + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_FROZEN) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + dis_pass = cmd->payload_in; + switch (dis_pass->type) { + case CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_MASTER: + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PLIMIT) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (!(mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PASS_SET)) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (memcmp(dis_pass->pass, mdata->master_pass, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN)) { + if (++mdata->master_limit == PASS_TRY_LIMIT) + mdata->security_state |= CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PLIMIT; + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_PASSPHRASE; + return -ENXIO; + } + + mdata->master_limit = 0; + memset(mdata->master_pass, 0, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN); + mdata->security_state &= ~CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PASS_SET; + break; + + case CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_USER: + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PLIMIT) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (!(mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET)) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (memcmp(dis_pass->pass, mdata->user_pass, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN)) { + if (++mdata->user_limit == PASS_TRY_LIMIT) + mdata->security_state |= CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PLIMIT; + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_PASSPHRASE; + return -ENXIO; + } + + mdata->user_limit = 0; + memset(mdata->user_pass, 0, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN); + mdata->security_state &= ~(CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET | + CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_LOCKED); + break; + + default: + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT; + return -EINVAL; + } + + return 0; +} + static int mock_get_lsa(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd) { struct cxl_mbox_get_lsa *get_lsa = cmd->payload_in; @@ -333,6 +410,9 @@ static int cxl_mock_mbox_send(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd * case CXL_MBOX_OP_SET_PASSPHRASE: rc = mock_set_passphrase(cxlds, cmd); break; + case CXL_MBOX_OP_DISABLE_PASSPHRASE: + rc = mock_disable_passphrase(cxlds, cmd); + break; default: break; }
Add support to emulate a CXL mem device support the "Disable Passphrase" operation. The operation supports disabling of either a user or a master passphrase. The emulation will provide support for both user and master passphrase. Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> --- tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)