Message ID | 20151222144605.08a84ded98a42d6125a7991e@linux-foundation.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:46:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:22:15 -0700 Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct address_space > > radix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it > > already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries. > > > > In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional > > entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages. > > These exceptional entries will also contain the writeback addresses for the > > PTE or PMD faults that we can use at fsync/msync time. > > > > There are currently two types of exceptional entries (shmem and shadow) > > that can be placed into the radix tree, and this adds a third. We rely on > > the fact that only one type of exceptional entry can be found in a given > > radix tree based on its usage. This happens for free with DAX vs shmem but > > we explicitly prevent shadow entries from being added to radix trees for > > DAX mappings. > > > > The only shadow entries that would be generated for DAX radix trees would > > be to track zero page mappings that were created for holes. These pages > > would receive minimal benefit from having shadow entries, and the choice > > to have only one type of exceptional entry in a given radix tree makes the > > logic simpler both in clear_exceptional_entry() and in the rest of DAX. > > > > > > ... > > > > --- a/include/linux/dax.h > > +++ b/include/linux/dax.h > > @@ -36,4 +36,9 @@ static inline bool vma_is_dax(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > { > > return vma->vm_file && IS_DAX(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host); > > } > > + > > +static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping) > > +{ > > + return mapping->host && IS_DAX(mapping->host); > > +} > > Can we make this evaluate to plain old "0" when CONFIG_FS_DAX=n? That > way a bunch of code in callers will fall away as well. > > If the compiler has any brains then a good way to do this would be to > make IS_DAX be "0" but one would need to check that the zeroness > properly propagated out of the inline. Ah, it already works that way due to some magic with IS_DAX(). I believe we already use the fact that blocks protected by IS_DAX() go away if CONFIG_FS_DAX isn't set. The trick is that S_DAX is defined to be 0 if CONFIG_FS_DAX isn't set. I'm pretty sure this is working because of the code in filemap_write_and_wait_range(). I added a block with the later "dax: add support for fsync/msync" patch which looks like this: @@ -482,6 +482,9 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct address_space *mapping, { int err = 0; + if (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrdax) + dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, lstart, lend); + Without the dax_mapping() check there the behavior is the same, but we fail to compile if CONFIG_FS_DAX isn't set because dax_writeback_mapping_range() isn't defined. (Guess how I found that out. :) ) > > #endif > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > > index 3aa5142..b9ac534 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > > @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ struct address_space { > > /* Protected by tree_lock together with the radix tree */ > > unsigned long nrpages; /* number of total pages */ > > unsigned long nrshadows; /* number of shadow entries */ > > + unsigned long nrdax; /* number of DAX entries */ > > hm, that's unfortunate - machines commonly carry tremendous numbers of > address_spaces in memory and adding pork to them is rather a big deal. > We can't avoid this somehow? Maybe share the space with nrshadows by > some means? Find some other field which is unused for dax files? Jan Kara noticed the same thing: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-December/003626.html It'll be fixed in the next spin of the patch set.
--- a/mm/filemap.c~dax-support-dirty-dax-entries-in-radix-tree-fix +++ a/mm/filemap.c @@ -581,10 +581,8 @@ static int page_cache_tree_insert(struct if (!radix_tree_exceptional_entry(p)) return -EEXIST; - if (dax_mapping(mapping)) { - WARN_ON(1); + if (WARN_ON(dax_mapping(mapping))) return -EINVAL; - } if (shadowp) *shadowp = p;