From patchwork Thu Jan 5 10:05:46 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefan Hajnoczi X-Patchwork-Id: 9498797 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18747606DE for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D53228179 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 1034028335; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:06:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562F728179 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949FC81994; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:05:49 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5789181993 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DE84E326; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([10.33.32.22]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v05A5lco009650; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:05:48 -0500 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: linux-nvdimm Subject: [PATCH] pmem: return EIO on read_pmem() failure Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:05:46 +0000 Message-Id: <20170105100546.11379-1-stefanha@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:05:48 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The read_pmem() function uses memcpy_mcsafe() on x86 where an EFAULT error code indicates a failed read. Block I/O should use EIO to indicate failure. Other pmem code paths (like bad blocks) already use EIO so let's be consistent. Cc: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer --- drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c index 7282d74..5b536be 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c @@ -90,7 +90,9 @@ static int read_pmem(struct page *page, unsigned int off, rc = memcpy_from_pmem(mem + off, pmem_addr, len); kunmap_atomic(mem); - return rc; + if (rc) + return -EIO; + return 0; } static int pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,