From patchwork Thu Feb 27 07:55:01 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zheng Qixing X-Patchwork-Id: 13993870 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F0E22B59D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740643169; cv=none; b=dzPOV7lVdjV6HuTBAzwWsHwYj4S4nxdInzG/rcRQy5glkJ+uZBE2uipcslhD4sF0QVtfvjUw0n5fEWATXqiJ1GNd+nHGxKCl0OlOh0R6GDxUBFwF2+CB1si36dd52Y/qelNWMOwNJiV+8aetEkqadJ6L42LEOm2LTYahRc+4CDA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740643169; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Kk0MBNT8yCR6K/0nlIq9Xcwt4wUbeup5aR7M6JJco4A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nhZXpeJWPDlUq4tafWz7I9zuYX2L2/cToNkxCBrZUPmOD4TbZjAvdndou+SkpqVg/NO5ZABmPTUHbiLjnIepmYOuJFNaUuQxwS3iQeGCj5n/ijchyu06IglH5aqe87J9gHALLpn1rPI3LTesdollXuB7W61xIEjV1gKWma+xhpQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Z3NyS6T4sz4f3jXV for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:58:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5771A1C52 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:59:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgDHKl9PG8Bn6c8gFA--.31377S10; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:59:18 +0800 (CST) From: Zheng Qixing To: axboe@kernel.dk, song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, dlemoal@kernel.org, kch@nvidia.com, yanjun.zhu@linux.dev, hare@suse.de, zhengqixing@huawei.com, colyli@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org, xni@redhat.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH V2 06/12] badblocks: fix the using of MAX_BADBLOCKS Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:55:01 +0800 Message-Id: <20250227075507.151331-7-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20250227075507.151331-1-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com> References: <20250227075507.151331-1-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgDHKl9PG8Bn6c8gFA--.31377S10 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7AF1kKr4DKr15JFWftrW8Zwb_yoW8Gr1fp3 ZxKwn8KrW09F1UWa1DZ3W5A34rW3WxAr48ua1rA3Wj9Fy8Aw1ftF1vqr1Yqry0gF43XFn2 q3Wq9FyruayxC37anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUPvb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAV Cq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0 rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267 AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E 14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7 xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Y z7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1lc7CjxVAaw2 AFwI0_GFv_Wryl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAq x4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r4a6r W5MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF 7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14 v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuY vjxUI-eODUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: x2kh0wptl0x03j6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ From: Li Nan The number of badblocks cannot exceed MAX_BADBLOCKS, but it should be allowed to equal MAX_BADBLOCKS. Fixes: aa511ff8218b ("badblocks: switch to the improved badblock handling code") Fixes: c3c6a86e9efc ("badblocks: add helper routines for badblock ranges handling") Signed-off-by: Li Nan Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai Acked-by: Coly Li --- block/badblocks.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c index 88f27d4f3856..43430bd3efa7 100644 --- a/block/badblocks.c +++ b/block/badblocks.c @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static bool can_front_overwrite(struct badblocks *bb, int prev, *extra = 2; } - if ((bb->count + (*extra)) >= MAX_BADBLOCKS) + if ((bb->count + (*extra)) > MAX_BADBLOCKS) return false; return true; @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors) if ((BB_OFFSET(p[prev]) < bad.start) && (BB_END(p[prev]) > (bad.start + bad.len))) { /* Splitting */ - if ((bb->count + 1) < MAX_BADBLOCKS) { + if ((bb->count + 1) <= MAX_BADBLOCKS) { len = front_splitting_clear(bb, prev, &bad); bb->count += 1; cleared++;