| Message ID | 50013c1ee52b5bb1213571bff66780568455f54c.1719386613.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Delegated to: | Ira Weiny |
| Headers | show |
| Series | fs/dax: Fix FS DAX page reference counts | expand |
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:54:21AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote: > +extern void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order); No need for the extern. > static int insert_page_into_pte_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte, > - unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot) > + unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot, bool mkwrite) Overly long line. > + retval = insert_page_into_pte_locked(vma, pte, addr, page, prot, mkwrite); .. same here. > +vm_fault_t dax_insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > + unsigned long addr, pfn_t pfn_t, bool write) This could probably use a kerneldoc comment.
On Thu 27-06-24 10:54:21, Alistair Popple wrote: > Currently to map a DAX page the DAX driver calls vmf_insert_pfn. This > creates a special devmap PTE entry for the pfn but does not take a > reference on the underlying struct page for the mapping. This is > because DAX page refcounts are treated specially, as indicated by the > presence of a devmap entry. > > To allow DAX page refcounts to be managed the same as normal page > refcounts introduce dax_insert_pfn. This will take a reference on the > underlying page much the same as vmf_insert_page, except it also > permits upgrading an existing mapping to be writable if > requested/possible. > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Overall this looks good to me. Some comments below. > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++- > mm/memory.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index 9a5652c..b84368b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ int vma_is_stack_for_current(struct vm_area_struct *vma); > struct mmu_gather; > struct inode; > > +extern void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order); > + You don't seem to use this function in this patch? > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index ce48a05..4f26a1f 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -1989,14 +1989,42 @@ static int validate_page_before_insert(struct page *page) > } > > static int insert_page_into_pte_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte, > - unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot) > + unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot, bool mkwrite) > { > struct folio *folio = page_folio(page); > + pte_t entry = ptep_get(pte); > > - if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte))) > + if (!pte_none(entry)) { > + if (mkwrite) { > + /* > + * For read faults on private mappings the PFN passed > + * in may not match the PFN we have mapped if the > + * mapped PFN is a writeable COW page. In the mkwrite > + * case we are creating a writable PTE for a shared > + * mapping and we expect the PFNs to match. If they > + * don't match, we are likely racing with block > + * allocation and mapping invalidation so just skip the > + * update. > + */ > + if (pte_pfn(entry) != page_to_pfn(page)) { > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(entry))); > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + entry = maybe_mkwrite(entry, vma); > + entry = pte_mkyoung(entry); > + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, pte, entry, 1)) > + update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, pte); > + return 0; > + } > return -EBUSY; If you do this like: if (!mkwrite) return -EBUSY; You can reduce indentation of the big block and also making the flow more obvious... > + } > + > /* Ok, finally just insert the thing.. */ > folio_get(folio); > + if (mkwrite) > + entry = maybe_mkwrite(mk_pte(page, prot), vma); > + else > + entry = mk_pte(page, prot); I'd prefer: entry = mk_pte(page, prot); if (mkwrite) entry = maybe_mkwrite(entry, vma); but I don't insist. Also insert_pfn() additionally has pte_mkyoung() and pte_mkdirty(). Why was it left out here? Honza
On 27.06.24 02:54, Alistair Popple wrote: > Currently to map a DAX page the DAX driver calls vmf_insert_pfn. This > creates a special devmap PTE entry for the pfn but does not take a > reference on the underlying struct page for the mapping. This is > because DAX page refcounts are treated specially, as indicated by the > presence of a devmap entry. > > To allow DAX page refcounts to be managed the same as normal page > refcounts introduce dax_insert_pfn. This will take a reference on the > underlying page much the same as vmf_insert_page, except it also > permits upgrading an existing mapping to be writable if > requested/possible. We have this comparably nasty vmf_insert_mixed() that FS dax abused to insert into !VM_MIXED VMAs. Is that abuse now stopping and are there maybe ways to get rid of vmf_insert_mixed()?
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> writes: > On 27.06.24 02:54, Alistair Popple wrote: >> Currently to map a DAX page the DAX driver calls vmf_insert_pfn. This >> creates a special devmap PTE entry for the pfn but does not take a >> reference on the underlying struct page for the mapping. This is >> because DAX page refcounts are treated specially, as indicated by the >> presence of a devmap entry. >> To allow DAX page refcounts to be managed the same as normal page >> refcounts introduce dax_insert_pfn. This will take a reference on the >> underlying page much the same as vmf_insert_page, except it also >> permits upgrading an existing mapping to be writable if >> requested/possible. > > We have this comparably nasty vmf_insert_mixed() that FS dax abused to > insert into !VM_MIXED VMAs. Is that abuse now stopping and are there > maybe ways to get rid of vmf_insert_mixed()? It's not something I've looked at but quite possibly - there are a couple of other users of vmf_insert_mixed() that would need to be removed though. I just added this as dax_insert_pfn() because as an API it is really specific to the DAX use case. For example a more general API would likely pass a page/folio.
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:18:31AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > We have this comparably nasty vmf_insert_mixed() that FS dax abused to > insert into !VM_MIXED VMAs. Is that abuse now stopping and are there maybe > ways to get rid of vmf_insert_mixed()? Unfortunately it is also used by a few drm drivers and not just DAX.
On 02.07.24 13:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:18:31AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> We have this comparably nasty vmf_insert_mixed() that FS dax abused to >> insert into !VM_MIXED VMAs. Is that abuse now stopping and are there maybe >> ways to get rid of vmf_insert_mixed()? > > Unfortunately it is also used by a few drm drivers and not just DAX. At least they all seem to set VM_MIXED: * fs/cramfs/inode.c does * drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/fbdev.c does * drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c does Only DAX (including drivers/dax/device.c) doesn't. VM_MIXEDMAP handling for DAX was changed in commit e1fb4a0864958fac2fb1b23f9f4562a9f90e3e8f Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Date: Fri Aug 17 15:43:40 2018 -0700 dax: remove VM_MIXEDMAP for fsdax and device dax After prepared by commit 785a3fab4adbf91b2189c928a59ae219c54ba95e Author: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Date: Mon Oct 23 07:20:00 2017 -0700 mm, dax: introduce pfn_t_special() In support of removing the VM_MIXEDMAP indication from DAX VMAs, introduce pfn_t_special() for drivers to indicate that _PAGE_SPECIAL should be used for DAX ptes. I wonder if there are ways forward to either remove vmf_insert_mixed() or at least require it (as the name suggests) to have VM_MIXEDMAP set.
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes: > On Thu 27-06-24 10:54:21, Alistair Popple wrote: >> Currently to map a DAX page the DAX driver calls vmf_insert_pfn. This >> creates a special devmap PTE entry for the pfn but does not take a >> reference on the underlying struct page for the mapping. This is >> because DAX page refcounts are treated specially, as indicated by the >> presence of a devmap entry. >> >> To allow DAX page refcounts to be managed the same as normal page >> refcounts introduce dax_insert_pfn. This will take a reference on the >> underlying page much the same as vmf_insert_page, except it also >> permits upgrading an existing mapping to be writable if >> requested/possible. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> > > Overall this looks good to me. Some comments below. > >> --- >> include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++- >> mm/memory.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h >> index 9a5652c..b84368b 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h >> @@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ int vma_is_stack_for_current(struct vm_area_struct *vma); >> struct mmu_gather; >> struct inode; >> >> +extern void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order); >> + > > You don't seem to use this function in this patch? Thanks, bad rebase splitting this up. It belongs later in the series. >> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c >> index ce48a05..4f26a1f 100644 >> --- a/mm/memory.c >> +++ b/mm/memory.c >> @@ -1989,14 +1989,42 @@ static int validate_page_before_insert(struct page *page) >> } >> >> static int insert_page_into_pte_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte, >> - unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot) >> + unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot, bool mkwrite) >> { >> struct folio *folio = page_folio(page); >> + pte_t entry = ptep_get(pte); >> >> - if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte))) >> + if (!pte_none(entry)) { >> + if (mkwrite) { >> + /* >> + * For read faults on private mappings the PFN passed >> + * in may not match the PFN we have mapped if the >> + * mapped PFN is a writeable COW page. In the mkwrite >> + * case we are creating a writable PTE for a shared >> + * mapping and we expect the PFNs to match. If they >> + * don't match, we are likely racing with block >> + * allocation and mapping invalidation so just skip the >> + * update. >> + */ >> + if (pte_pfn(entry) != page_to_pfn(page)) { >> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(entry))); >> + return -EFAULT; >> + } >> + entry = maybe_mkwrite(entry, vma); >> + entry = pte_mkyoung(entry); >> + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, pte, entry, 1)) >> + update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, pte); >> + return 0; >> + } >> return -EBUSY; > > If you do this like: > > if (!mkwrite) > return -EBUSY; > > You can reduce indentation of the big block and also making the flow more > obvious... Good idea. >> + } >> + >> /* Ok, finally just insert the thing.. */ >> folio_get(folio); >> + if (mkwrite) >> + entry = maybe_mkwrite(mk_pte(page, prot), vma); >> + else >> + entry = mk_pte(page, prot); > > I'd prefer: > > entry = mk_pte(page, prot); > if (mkwrite) > entry = maybe_mkwrite(entry, vma); > > but I don't insist. Also insert_pfn() additionally has pte_mkyoung() and > pte_mkdirty(). Why was it left out here? An oversight by me, thanks for pointing it out! > Honza
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 9a5652c..b84368b 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ int vma_is_stack_for_current(struct vm_area_struct *vma); struct mmu_gather; struct inode; +extern void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order); + /* * compound_order() can be called without holding a reference, which means * that niceties like page_folio() don't work. These callers should be @@ -3624,6 +3626,8 @@ int vm_map_pages(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page **pages, unsigned long num); int vm_map_pages_zero(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page **pages, unsigned long num); +vm_fault_t dax_insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long addr, pfn_t pfn, bool write); vm_fault_t vmf_insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, unsigned long pfn); vm_fault_t vmf_insert_pfn_prot(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index ce48a05..4f26a1f 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -1989,14 +1989,42 @@ static int validate_page_before_insert(struct page *page) } static int insert_page_into_pte_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte, - unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot) + unsigned long addr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot, bool mkwrite) { struct folio *folio = page_folio(page); + pte_t entry = ptep_get(pte); - if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte))) + if (!pte_none(entry)) { + if (mkwrite) { + /* + * For read faults on private mappings the PFN passed + * in may not match the PFN we have mapped if the + * mapped PFN is a writeable COW page. In the mkwrite + * case we are creating a writable PTE for a shared + * mapping and we expect the PFNs to match. If they + * don't match, we are likely racing with block + * allocation and mapping invalidation so just skip the + * update. + */ + if (pte_pfn(entry) != page_to_pfn(page)) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(entry))); + return -EFAULT; + } + entry = maybe_mkwrite(entry, vma); + entry = pte_mkyoung(entry); + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, pte, entry, 1)) + update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, pte); + return 0; + } return -EBUSY; + } + /* Ok, finally just insert the thing.. */ folio_get(folio); + if (mkwrite) + entry = maybe_mkwrite(mk_pte(page, prot), vma); + else + entry = mk_pte(page, prot); inc_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(folio)); folio_add_file_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma); set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(page, prot)); @@ -2011,7 +2039,7 @@ static int insert_page_into_pte_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte, * pages reserved for the old functions anyway. */ static int insert_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, - struct page *page, pgprot_t prot) + struct page *page, pgprot_t prot, bool mkwrite) { int retval; pte_t *pte; @@ -2024,7 +2052,7 @@ static int insert_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte = get_locked_pte(vma->vm_mm, addr, &ptl); if (!pte) goto out; - retval = insert_page_into_pte_locked(vma, pte, addr, page, prot); + retval = insert_page_into_pte_locked(vma, pte, addr, page, prot, mkwrite); pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); out: return retval; @@ -2040,7 +2068,7 @@ static int insert_page_in_batch_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte, err = validate_page_before_insert(page); if (err) return err; - return insert_page_into_pte_locked(vma, pte, addr, page, prot); + return insert_page_into_pte_locked(vma, pte, addr, page, prot, false); } /* insert_pages() amortizes the cost of spinlock operations @@ -2177,7 +2205,7 @@ int vm_insert_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, BUG_ON(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP); vm_flags_set(vma, VM_MIXEDMAP); } - return insert_page(vma, addr, page, vma->vm_page_prot); + return insert_page(vma, addr, page, vma->vm_page_prot, false); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_insert_page); @@ -2451,7 +2479,7 @@ static vm_fault_t __vm_insert_mixed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, * result in pfn_t_has_page() == false. */ page = pfn_to_page(pfn_t_to_pfn(pfn)); - err = insert_page(vma, addr, page, pgprot); + err = insert_page(vma, addr, page, pgprot, mkwrite); } else { return insert_pfn(vma, addr, pfn, pgprot, mkwrite); } @@ -2464,6 +2492,43 @@ static vm_fault_t __vm_insert_mixed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; } +vm_fault_t dax_insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long addr, pfn_t pfn_t, bool write) +{ + pgprot_t pgprot = vma->vm_page_prot; + unsigned long pfn = pfn_t_to_pfn(pfn_t); + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); + int err; + + if (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + + track_pfn_insert(vma, &pgprot, pfn_t); + + if (!pfn_modify_allowed(pfn, pgprot)) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + + /* + * We refcount the page normally so make sure pfn_valid is true. + */ + if (!pfn_t_valid(pfn_t)) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn_t_devmap(pfn_t)); + + if (WARN_ON(is_zero_pfn(pfn) && write)) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + + err = insert_page(vma, addr, page, pgprot, write); + if (err == -ENOMEM) + return VM_FAULT_OOM; + if (err < 0 && err != -EBUSY) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_insert_pfn); + vm_fault_t vmf_insert_mixed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pfn_t pfn) {
Currently to map a DAX page the DAX driver calls vmf_insert_pfn. This creates a special devmap PTE entry for the pfn but does not take a reference on the underlying struct page for the mapping. This is because DAX page refcounts are treated specially, as indicated by the presence of a devmap entry. To allow DAX page refcounts to be managed the same as normal page refcounts introduce dax_insert_pfn. This will take a reference on the underlying page much the same as vmf_insert_page, except it also permits upgrading an existing mapping to be writable if requested/possible. Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> --- include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++- mm/memory.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)