| Message ID | 1311841821-10252-5-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thursday, July 28, 2011, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote: > From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > > Re-design the PM QoS implementation to support the per-device > constraints: Well, I guess I should have reviewed this patch before [03/13]. > - Define a pm_qos_constraints struct for the storage of the constraints > list and associated values (target_value, default_value, type ...). > > - Update the pm_qos_object struct with the information related to a > PM QoS class: ptr to constraints list, notifer ptr, name ... > > - Each PM QoS class statically declare objects for pm_qos_object and > pm_qos_constraints. The only exception is the devices constraints, cf. below. > > - The device constraints class is statically declaring a pm_qos_object. The > pm_qos_constraints are per-device and so are embedded into the device struct. > > - The PM QoS internal functions are updated to operate on the pm_qos_constraints > structs for the constraints management, and on pm_qos_object for other the PM QoS > functionality (notifiers, export as misc devices...). > > - The PM QoS events notification callbacks are passing the full constraint > request data in order for the callees to have access to it. The current use > is for the platform low-level code to access the target device of the constraint > > - User space API: the PM QoS classes -excepted PM_QOS_DEV_LATENCY- are exporting > a MISC entry in /dev. PM_QOS_DEV_LATENCY shall export a per-device sysfs entry, this > support is coming as a subsequent patch. > > - Misc fixes to improve code readability: > . rename of fields names (request, list, constraints, class), Please avoid doing renames along with functional changes. It makes reviewing extremely hard. > . simplification of the in-kernel API implementation. The main logic part is > now implemented in the update_target function. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > --- > drivers/base/power/main.c | 7 +- > include/linux/pm.h | 3 +- > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 23 ++++- > kernel/pm_qos.c | 248 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 4 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c > index dad2eb9..360c2c0 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c > @@ -97,7 +97,12 @@ void device_pm_add(struct device *dev) > dev_name(dev->parent)); > list_add_tail(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_list); > mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx); > - plist_head_init(&dev->power.latency_constraints, &dev->power.lock); > + plist_head_init(&dev->power.latency_constraints.list, &dev->power.lock); > + dev->power.latency_constraints.target_value = > + PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE; > + dev->power.latency_constraints.default_value = > + PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE; > + dev->power.latency_constraints.type = PM_QOS_MIN; Perhaps add a helper doing these assignments? > } > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h > index 23c85f1..35e48a3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm.h > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #include <linux/wait.h> > #include <linux/timer.h> > #include <linux/completion.h> > +#include <linux/pm_qos.h> > > /* > * Callbacks for platform drivers to implement. > @@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { > unsigned long accounting_timestamp; > void *subsys_data; /* Owned by the subsystem. */ > #endif > - struct plist_head latency_constraints; > + struct pm_qos_constraints latency_constraints; Why don't you simply call it "qos"? The data type provides the information about what it's for now. > }; > > extern void update_pm_runtime_accounting(struct device *dev); > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > index a2e4409..d72b16b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ > */ > #include <linux/plist.h> > #include <linux/notifier.h> > -#include <linux/miscdevice.h> > > #define PM_QOS_RESERVED 0 > #define PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1 > @@ -22,8 +21,28 @@ > #define PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE (2000 * USEC_PER_SEC) > #define PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE 0 > > +enum pm_qos_type { > + PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ > + PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ > +}; > + > +struct pm_qos_constraints { > + struct plist_head list; > + /* > + * Do not change target_value to 64 bit in order to guarantee > + * accesses atomicity > + */ The comment doesn't belong here. Please put it outside of the structure definition or after the field name (or both, in which case the "inline" one may be shorter, like "must not be 64-bit"). > + s32 target_value; > + s32 default_value; > + enum pm_qos_type type; > +}; > + > +/* > + * Struct that is pre-allocated by the caller. > + * The handle is kept for future use (update, removal) > + */ > struct pm_qos_request { > - struct plist_node list; > + struct plist_node node; Please avoid doing such things along with functional changes. > int class; > struct device *dev; > }; > diff --git a/kernel/pm_qos.c b/kernel/pm_qos.c > index 4ede3cd..7edc6d0 100644 > --- a/kernel/pm_qos.c > +++ b/kernel/pm_qos.c > @@ -49,71 +49,81 @@ > * or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock > * held, taken with _irqsave. One lock to rule them all > */ > -enum pm_qos_type { > - PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ > - PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ > + > +enum pm_qos_req_action { > + PM_QOS_ADD_REQ, > + PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, > + PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ > }; A comment describing the meaning of these would be helpful. > -/* > - * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing > - * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU > - * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites > - */ > struct pm_qos_object { > - struct plist_head requests; > + struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints; > struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers; > struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev; > char *name; > - s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */ > - s32 default_value; > - enum pm_qos_type type; > }; > > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock); > > static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos; > + > +/* CPU/DMA latency constraints PM QoS object */ > +static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = { > + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), > + .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > + .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > + .type = PM_QOS_MIN, > +}; > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier); > static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = { > - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), > + .constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints, > .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier, > .name = "cpu_dma_latency", > - .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .type = PM_QOS_MIN, > }; > > +/* > + * Per-device latency constraints PM QoS object > + * > + * The constraints are stored in the device struct data. > + * No misc device is exported to /dev, instead the user space API > + * shall use a per-device /sysfs entry. > + */ > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(dev_lat_notifier); > static struct pm_qos_object dev_pm_qos = { > - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(dev_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), > + .constraints = NULL, > .notifiers = &dev_lat_notifier, > + .pm_qos_power_miscdev = { .minor = -1 }, > .name = "dev_latency", > - .target_value = PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .default_value = PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .type = PM_QOS_MIN, > }; > > +/* Network latency constraints PM QoS object */ > +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = { > + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), > + .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > + .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > + .type = PM_QOS_MIN > +}; > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier); > static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = { > - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), > + .constraints = &network_lat_constraints, > .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier, > .name = "network_latency", > - .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .type = PM_QOS_MIN > }; > > - > +/* Network throughput constraints PM QoS object */ > +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = { > + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), > + .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > + .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > + .type = PM_QOS_MAX, > +}; > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier); > static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = { > - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), > + .constraints = &network_tput_constraints, > .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier, > .name = "network_throughput", > - .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .type = PM_QOS_MAX, > }; > > - > static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = { > &null_pm_qos, > &cpu_dma_pm_qos, > @@ -138,17 +148,17 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = { > }; > > /* unlocked internal variant */ > -static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) > +static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c) I'd remove the "inline" if you're at it. It's only a hint if the kernel is not built with "always inline" and the compiler should do the inlining anyway if that's a better choice. > { > - if (plist_head_empty(&o->requests)) > - return o->default_value; > + if (plist_head_empty(&c->list)) > + return c->default_value; > > - switch (o->type) { > + switch (c->type) { > case PM_QOS_MIN: > - return plist_first(&o->requests)->prio; > + return plist_first(&c->list)->prio; > > case PM_QOS_MAX: > - return plist_last(&o->requests)->prio; > + return plist_last(&c->list)->prio; > > default: > /* runtime check for not using enum */ > @@ -156,69 +166,92 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) > } > } > > -static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) > +/* > + * pm_qos_read_value atomically reads and returns target_value. We have a standard for writing kerneldoc comments, please follow it. > + * target_value is updated upon update of the constraints list, using > + * pm_qos_set_value. > + * > + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing > + * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU > + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites You should say "data types" rather than "quantities" here. > + */ > +static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c) > { > - return o->target_value; > + if (c) > + return c->target_value; > + else > + return 0; > } > > -static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value) > +static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c, s32 value) > { > - o->target_value = value; > + c->target_value = value; > } Well, I'm not sure that this function is necessary at all. You might as well simply remove it as far as I'm concerned. > -static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, > - int del, int value) > +static void update_target(struct pm_qos_request *req, > + enum pm_qos_req_action action, int value) > { > unsigned long flags; > - int prev_value, curr_value; > + int prev_value, curr_value, new_value; > + struct pm_qos_object *o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; > + struct pm_qos_constraints *c; > + > + switch (req->class) { > + case PM_QOS_DEV_LATENCY: > + if (!req->dev) { > + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with NULL dev\n"); > + return; > + } > + c = &req->dev->power.latency_constraints; > + break; > + case PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY: > + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY: > + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT: > + c = o->constraints; > + break; > + case PM_QOS_RESERVED: > + default: > + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with wrong class %d, " > + "req 0x%p\n", req->class, req); > + return; > + } Do we _really_ need that switch()? What about introducing dev_pm_qos_add_request() and friends specifically for devices, such that they will take the target device object (dev) as their first argument? Then, you could keep pm_qos_add_request() pretty much as is, right? > > spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > - prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); > - /* PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE is a signal that the value is unchanged */ > - if (value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) { > + > + prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); > + if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) > + new_value = c->default_value; > + else > + new_value = value; What about writing that as new_value = value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE ? value : c->default_value; > + > + switch (action) { > + case PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ: > + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); > + break; > + case PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ: > /* > * to change the list, we atomically remove, reinit > * with new value and add, then see if the extremal > * changed > */ > - plist_del(node, &o->requests); > - plist_node_init(node, value); > - plist_add(node, &o->requests); > - } else if (del) { > - plist_del(node, &o->requests); > - } else { > - plist_add(node, &o->requests); > + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); > + case PM_QOS_ADD_REQ: > + plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value); > + plist_add(&req->node, &c->list); > + break; > + default: > + /* no action */ > + ; > } > - curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); > - pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value); > + > + curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); > + pm_qos_set_value(c, curr_value); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > > if (prev_value != curr_value) > blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers, That's why I'm thinking that it would be helpful to have a pointer to the notifier list from struct pm_qos_constraints . Besides, you can use "pm_qos_array[req->class]->notifiers" instead of "o->notifiers". > (unsigned long)curr_value, > - NULL); > -} > - > -static int register_pm_qos_misc(struct pm_qos_object *qos) > -{ > - qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; > - qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.name = qos->name; > - qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.fops = &pm_qos_power_fops; > - > - return misc_register(&qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev); > -} > - > -static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) > -{ > - int pm_qos_class; > - > - for (pm_qos_class = 0; > - pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) { > - if (minor == > - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor) > - return pm_qos_class; > - } > - return -1; > + req); > } > > /** > @@ -229,7 +262,7 @@ static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) > */ > int pm_qos_request(int class) > { > - return pm_qos_read_value(pm_qos_array[class]); > + return pm_qos_read_value(pm_qos_array[class]->constraints); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_request); > > @@ -254,22 +287,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_request_active); > void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, > struct pm_qos_parameters *params) > { > - struct pm_qos_object *o = pm_qos_array[params->class]; > - int new_value; > - > if (pm_qos_request_active(req)) { > WARN(1, KERN_ERR "pm_qos_add_request() called for already " > "added request\n"); > return; > } > - if (params->value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) > - new_value = o->default_value; > - else > - new_value = params->value; > - plist_node_init(&req->list, new_value); > + > req->class = params->class; > req->dev = params->dev; > - update_target(o, &req->list, 0, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); > + update_target(req, PM_QOS_ADD_REQ, params->value); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_add_request); > > @@ -285,9 +311,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_add_request); > */ > void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, s32 new_value) > { > - s32 temp; > - struct pm_qos_object *o; > - > if (!req) /*guard against callers passing in null */ > return; > > @@ -296,15 +319,8 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, s32 new_value) > return; > } > > - o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; > - > - if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) > - temp = o->default_value; > - else > - temp = new_value; > - > - if (temp != req->list.prio) > - update_target(o, &req->list, 0, temp); > + if (new_value != req->node.prio) > + update_target(req, PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, new_value); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request); > > @@ -318,8 +334,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request); > */ > void pm_qos_remove_request(struct pm_qos_request *req) > { > - struct pm_qos_object *o; > - > if (req == NULL) > return; > /* silent return to keep pcm code cleaner */ > @@ -329,8 +343,8 @@ void pm_qos_remove_request(struct pm_qos_request *req) > return; > } > > - o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; > - update_target(o, &req->list, 1, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); > + update_target(req, PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); > + > memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_remove_request); > @@ -373,6 +387,28 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int class, struct notifier_block *notifier) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_remove_notifier); > > +static int register_pm_qos_misc(struct pm_qos_object *qos) > +{ > + qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; > + qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.name = qos->name; > + qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.fops = &pm_qos_power_fops; > + > + return misc_register(&qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev); > +} > + > +static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) > +{ > + int pm_qos_class; > + > + for (pm_qos_class = 0; > + pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) { > + if (minor == > + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor) > + return pm_qos_class; > + } > + return -1; > +} This function doesn't seem to be used anywhere, what's the purpose of it? > + > static int pm_qos_power_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > { > struct pm_qos_parameters pm_qos_params; > @@ -410,7 +446,6 @@ static ssize_t pm_qos_power_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, > { > s32 value; > unsigned long flags; > - struct pm_qos_object *o; > struct pm_qos_request *req = filp->private_data; > > if (!req) > @@ -418,9 +453,8 @@ static ssize_t pm_qos_power_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, > if (!pm_qos_request_active(req)) > return -EINVAL; > > - o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; > spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > - value = pm_qos_get_value(o); > + value = pm_qos_get_value(pm_qos_array[req->class]->constraints); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > > return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, f_pos, &value, sizeof(s32)); Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Rafael, 2011/7/31 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>: > On Thursday, July 28, 2011, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote: >> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> >> >> Re-design the PM QoS implementation to support the per-device >> constraints: > > Well, I guess I should have reviewed this patch before [03/13]. Hmm indeed. The split of patches into API and implementation patches wakes it rather confusing. I could add a comment in [03/13] about it. ... >> - Misc fixes to improve code readability: >> . rename of fields names (request, list, constraints, class), > > Please avoid doing renames along with functional changes. It makes reviewing > extremely hard. Ok I will move the renames in a different patch. ... >> @@ -97,7 +97,12 @@ void device_pm_add(struct device *dev) >> dev_name(dev->parent)); >> list_add_tail(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_list); >> mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx); >> - plist_head_init(&dev->power.latency_constraints, &dev->power.lock); >> + plist_head_init(&dev->power.latency_constraints.list, &dev->power.lock); >> + dev->power.latency_constraints.target_value = >> + PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE; >> + dev->power.latency_constraints.default_value = >> + PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE; >> + dev->power.latency_constraints.type = PM_QOS_MIN; > > Perhaps add a helper doing these assignments? This code is later moved into the device insertion and removal functions. Cf. [05/13]. ... >> @@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { >> unsigned long accounting_timestamp; >> void *subsys_data; /* Owned by the subsystem. */ >> #endif >> - struct plist_head latency_constraints; >> + struct pm_qos_constraints latency_constraints; > > Why don't you simply call it "qos"? The data type provides the information > about what it's for now. Ok ... >> +struct pm_qos_constraints { >> + struct plist_head list; >> + /* >> + * Do not change target_value to 64 bit in order to guarantee >> + * accesses atomicity >> + */ > > The comment doesn't belong here. Please put it outside of the structure > definition or after the field name (or both, in which case the "inline" > one may be shorter, like "must not be 64-bit"). Ok > >> + s32 target_value; >> + s32 default_value; >> + enum pm_qos_type type; >> +}; >> + >> +/* >> + * Struct that is pre-allocated by the caller. >> + * The handle is kept for future use (update, removal) >> + */ >> struct pm_qos_request { >> - struct plist_node list; >> + struct plist_node node; > > Please avoid doing such things along with functional changes. Ok ... >> +enum pm_qos_req_action { >> + PM_QOS_ADD_REQ, >> + PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, >> + PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ >> }; > > A comment describing the meaning of these would be helpful. Ok ... >> -static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) >> +static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c) > > I'd remove the "inline" if you're at it. It's only a hint if the kernel > is not built with "always inline" and the compiler should do the inlining > anyway if that's a better choice. Ok ... >> -static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) >> +/* >> + * pm_qos_read_value atomically reads and returns target_value. > > We have a standard for writing kerneldoc comments, please follow it. Ok > >> + * target_value is updated upon update of the constraints list, using >> + * pm_qos_set_value. >> + * >> + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing >> + * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU >> + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites > > You should say "data types" rather than "quantities" here. Ok > >> + */ >> +static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c) >> { >> - return o->target_value; >> + if (c) >> + return c->target_value; >> + else >> + return 0; >> } >> >> -static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value) >> +static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c, s32 value) >> { >> - o->target_value = value; >> + c->target_value = value; >> } > > Well, I'm not sure that this function is necessary at all. You might as well > simply remove it as far as I'm concerned. The idea is to provide an efficient and lockless way to get the aggregated constraint class value. When the constraints a re changing the new value is calculated and stored using pm_qos_get_value and pm_qos_set_value. Then pm_qos_read_value is used to retrieve the value. For example cpuidle calls pm_qos_request which uses pm_qos_read_value to get the CPU/DMA minimum latency. > >> -static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, >> - int del, int value) >> +static void update_target(struct pm_qos_request *req, >> + enum pm_qos_req_action action, int value) >> { >> unsigned long flags; >> - int prev_value, curr_value; >> + int prev_value, curr_value, new_value; >> + struct pm_qos_object *o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; >> + struct pm_qos_constraints *c; >> + >> + switch (req->class) { >> + case PM_QOS_DEV_LATENCY: >> + if (!req->dev) { >> + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with NULL dev\n"); >> + return; >> + } >> + c = &req->dev->power.latency_constraints; >> + break; >> + case PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY: >> + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY: >> + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT: >> + c = o->constraints; >> + break; >> + case PM_QOS_RESERVED: >> + default: >> + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with wrong class %d, " >> + "req 0x%p\n", req->class, req); >> + return; >> + } > > Do we _really_ need that switch()? > > What about introducing dev_pm_qos_add_request() and friends specifically > for devices, such that they will take the target device object (dev) as > their first argument? Then, you could keep pm_qos_add_request() pretty > much as is, right? Yes but in that case I need to duplicate the API functions for devices (add, update, remove). Those functions will call update_target. I prefer the way this patch does it: simplify the API functions and have only 1 place with the constraints management and notification logic (in update_target). > >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags); >> - prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); >> - /* PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE is a signal that the value is unchanged */ >> - if (value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) { >> + >> + prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); >> + if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) >> + new_value = c->default_value; >> + else >> + new_value = value; > > What about writing that as > > new_value = value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE ? value : c->default_value; This is shorter but more difficult to read ;8 > >> + >> + switch (action) { >> + case PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ: >> + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); >> + break; >> + case PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ: >> /* >> * to change the list, we atomically remove, reinit >> * with new value and add, then see if the extremal >> * changed >> */ >> - plist_del(node, &o->requests); >> - plist_node_init(node, value); >> - plist_add(node, &o->requests); >> - } else if (del) { >> - plist_del(node, &o->requests); >> - } else { >> - plist_add(node, &o->requests); >> + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); >> + case PM_QOS_ADD_REQ: >> + plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value); >> + plist_add(&req->node, &c->list); >> + break; >> + default: >> + /* no action */ >> + ; >> } >> - curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); >> - pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value); >> + >> + curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); >> + pm_qos_set_value(c, curr_value); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); >> >> if (prev_value != curr_value) >> blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers, > > That's why I'm thinking that it would be helpful to have a pointer > to the notifier list from struct pm_qos_constraints . I think having a per-device notifier list is complicating things. If a subsystem needs te be notified it needs to register a notifier callback for _every_ device in the system. As a first implementation for OMAP the low-level PM code is using a single notifier to retrieve all the devices latency constraints and apply them to the pwer domains. I do not see how this could work with a per-device notifier list. > > Besides, you can use "pm_qos_array[req->class]->notifiers" instead of > "o->notifiers". Ok ... >> +static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) >> +{ >> + int pm_qos_class; >> + >> + for (pm_qos_class = 0; >> + pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) { >> + if (minor == >> + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor) >> + return pm_qos_class; >> + } >> + return -1; >> +} > > This function doesn't seem to be used anywhere, what's the purpose of it? It is used by pm_qos_power_open in order to retrieve the class associated with the MISC device. BTW this patch is moving the code so that all the MISC related functions are grouped together. > >> + >> static int pm_qos_power_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) >> { >> struct pm_qos_parameters pm_qos_params; ... > > Thanks, > Rafael Thanks, Jean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, On Tuesday, August 02, 2011, Jean Pihet wrote: ... > >> -static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value) > >> +static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c, s32 value) > >> { > >> - o->target_value = value; > >> + c->target_value = value; > >> } > > > > Well, I'm not sure that this function is necessary at all. You might as well > > simply remove it as far as I'm concerned. > The idea is to provide an efficient and lockless way to get the > aggregated constraint class value. When the constraints a re changing > the new value is calculated and stored using pm_qos_get_value and > pm_qos_set_value. Then pm_qos_read_value is used to retrieve the > value. For example cpuidle calls pm_qos_request which uses > pm_qos_read_value to get the CPU/DMA minimum latency. Still, pm_qos_set_value() is static in this file and doesn't really serve any specific purpose except for symmetry with pm_qos_read_value(). Anyway, as I said I'm not sure, so it's OK to leave it as is to me too. > > > > >> -static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, > >> - int del, int value) > >> +static void update_target(struct pm_qos_request *req, > >> + enum pm_qos_req_action action, int value) > >> { > >> unsigned long flags; > >> - int prev_value, curr_value; > >> + int prev_value, curr_value, new_value; > >> + struct pm_qos_object *o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; > >> + struct pm_qos_constraints *c; > >> + > >> + switch (req->class) { > >> + case PM_QOS_DEV_LATENCY: > >> + if (!req->dev) { > >> + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with NULL dev\n"); > >> + return; > >> + } > >> + c = &req->dev->power.latency_constraints; > >> + break; > >> + case PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY: > >> + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY: > >> + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT: > >> + c = o->constraints; > >> + break; > >> + case PM_QOS_RESERVED: > >> + default: > >> + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with wrong class %d, " > >> + "req 0x%p\n", req->class, req); > >> + return; > >> + } > > > > Do we _really_ need that switch()? > > > > What about introducing dev_pm_qos_add_request() and friends specifically > > for devices, such that they will take the target device object (dev) as > > their first argument? Then, you could keep pm_qos_add_request() pretty > > much as is, right? > Yes but in that case I need to duplicate the API functions for devices > (add, update, remove). Those functions will call update_target. > I prefer the way this patch does it: simplify the API functions and > have only 1 place with the constraints management and notification > logic (in update_target). The device functions would still call update_target(), but directly on the device's struct struct pm_qos_constraints, so they wouldn't really duplicate the existing pm_qos_*_request(). > > > > >> > >> spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > >> - prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); > >> - /* PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE is a signal that the value is unchanged */ > >> - if (value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) { > >> + > >> + prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); > >> + if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) > >> + new_value = c->default_value; > >> + else > >> + new_value = value; > > > > What about writing that as > > > > new_value = value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE ? value : c->default_value; > This is shorter but more difficult to read ;8 That depends on who you ask. :-) > > > >> + > >> + switch (action) { > >> + case PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ: > >> + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); > >> + break; > >> + case PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ: > >> /* > >> * to change the list, we atomically remove, reinit > >> * with new value and add, then see if the extremal > >> * changed > >> */ > >> - plist_del(node, &o->requests); > >> - plist_node_init(node, value); > >> - plist_add(node, &o->requests); > >> - } else if (del) { > >> - plist_del(node, &o->requests); > >> - } else { > >> - plist_add(node, &o->requests); > >> + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); > >> + case PM_QOS_ADD_REQ: > >> + plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value); > >> + plist_add(&req->node, &c->list); > >> + break; > >> + default: > >> + /* no action */ > >> + ; > >> } > >> - curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); > >> - pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value); > >> + > >> + curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); > >> + pm_qos_set_value(c, curr_value); > >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > >> > >> if (prev_value != curr_value) > >> blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers, > > > > That's why I'm thinking that it would be helpful to have a pointer > > to the notifier list from struct pm_qos_constraints . > I think having a per-device notifier list is complicating things. If a > subsystem needs te be notified it needs to register a notifier > callback for _every_ device in the system. I'm not really sure. For example, why would a video subsystem want to be notified of a PM QoS change in a keyboard? > As a first implementation for OMAP the low-level PM code is using a > single notifier to retrieve all the devices latency constraints and > apply them to the pwer domains. I do not see how this could work with > a per-device notifier list. If you need a global notifier chain, it can be implemented as a separate static variable as I said in my last reply in the [03/13] thread. > > > > > Besides, you can use "pm_qos_array[req->class]->notifiers" instead of > > "o->notifiers". > Ok > > ... > >> +static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) > >> +{ > >> + int pm_qos_class; > >> + > >> + for (pm_qos_class = 0; > >> + pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) { > >> + if (minor == > >> + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor) > >> + return pm_qos_class; > >> + } > >> + return -1; > >> +} > > > > This function doesn't seem to be used anywhere, what's the purpose of it? > It is used by pm_qos_power_open in order to retrieve the class > associated with the MISC device. > BTW this patch is moving the code so that all the MISC related > functions are grouped together. OK, one more thing that needs to be done in a separate patch. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c index dad2eb9..360c2c0 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c @@ -97,7 +97,12 @@ void device_pm_add(struct device *dev) dev_name(dev->parent)); list_add_tail(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_list); mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx); - plist_head_init(&dev->power.latency_constraints, &dev->power.lock); + plist_head_init(&dev->power.latency_constraints.list, &dev->power.lock); + dev->power.latency_constraints.target_value = + PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE; + dev->power.latency_constraints.default_value = + PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE; + dev->power.latency_constraints.type = PM_QOS_MIN; } /** diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h index 23c85f1..35e48a3 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm.h +++ b/include/linux/pm.h @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include <linux/wait.h> #include <linux/timer.h> #include <linux/completion.h> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h> /* * Callbacks for platform drivers to implement. @@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { unsigned long accounting_timestamp; void *subsys_data; /* Owned by the subsystem. */ #endif - struct plist_head latency_constraints; + struct pm_qos_constraints latency_constraints; }; extern void update_pm_runtime_accounting(struct device *dev); diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h index a2e4409..d72b16b 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ */ #include <linux/plist.h> #include <linux/notifier.h> -#include <linux/miscdevice.h> #define PM_QOS_RESERVED 0 #define PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1 @@ -22,8 +21,28 @@ #define PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE (2000 * USEC_PER_SEC) #define PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE 0 +enum pm_qos_type { + PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ + PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ +}; + +struct pm_qos_constraints { + struct plist_head list; + /* + * Do not change target_value to 64 bit in order to guarantee + * accesses atomicity + */ + s32 target_value; + s32 default_value; + enum pm_qos_type type; +}; + +/* + * Struct that is pre-allocated by the caller. + * The handle is kept for future use (update, removal) + */ struct pm_qos_request { - struct plist_node list; + struct plist_node node; int class; struct device *dev; }; diff --git a/kernel/pm_qos.c b/kernel/pm_qos.c index 4ede3cd..7edc6d0 100644 --- a/kernel/pm_qos.c +++ b/kernel/pm_qos.c @@ -49,71 +49,81 @@ * or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock * held, taken with _irqsave. One lock to rule them all */ -enum pm_qos_type { - PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ - PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ + +enum pm_qos_req_action { + PM_QOS_ADD_REQ, + PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, + PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ }; -/* - * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing - * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU - * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites - */ struct pm_qos_object { - struct plist_head requests; + struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints; struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers; struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev; char *name; - s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */ - s32 default_value; - enum pm_qos_type type; }; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock); static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos; + +/* CPU/DMA latency constraints PM QoS object */ +static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = { + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), + .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, + .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, + .type = PM_QOS_MIN, +}; static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier); static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = { - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), + .constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints, .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier, .name = "cpu_dma_latency", - .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .type = PM_QOS_MIN, }; +/* + * Per-device latency constraints PM QoS object + * + * The constraints are stored in the device struct data. + * No misc device is exported to /dev, instead the user space API + * shall use a per-device /sysfs entry. + */ static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(dev_lat_notifier); static struct pm_qos_object dev_pm_qos = { - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(dev_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), + .constraints = NULL, .notifiers = &dev_lat_notifier, + .pm_qos_power_miscdev = { .minor = -1 }, .name = "dev_latency", - .target_value = PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .default_value = PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .type = PM_QOS_MIN, }; +/* Network latency constraints PM QoS object */ +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = { + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), + .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, + .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, + .type = PM_QOS_MIN +}; static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier); static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = { - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), + .constraints = &network_lat_constraints, .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier, .name = "network_latency", - .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .type = PM_QOS_MIN }; - +/* Network throughput constraints PM QoS object */ +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = { + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), + .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, + .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, + .type = PM_QOS_MAX, +}; static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier); static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = { - .requests = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.requests, pm_qos_lock), + .constraints = &network_tput_constraints, .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier, .name = "network_throughput", - .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .type = PM_QOS_MAX, }; - static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = { &null_pm_qos, &cpu_dma_pm_qos, @@ -138,17 +148,17 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = { }; /* unlocked internal variant */ -static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) +static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c) { - if (plist_head_empty(&o->requests)) - return o->default_value; + if (plist_head_empty(&c->list)) + return c->default_value; - switch (o->type) { + switch (c->type) { case PM_QOS_MIN: - return plist_first(&o->requests)->prio; + return plist_first(&c->list)->prio; case PM_QOS_MAX: - return plist_last(&o->requests)->prio; + return plist_last(&c->list)->prio; default: /* runtime check for not using enum */ @@ -156,69 +166,92 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) } } -static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) +/* + * pm_qos_read_value atomically reads and returns target_value. + * target_value is updated upon update of the constraints list, using + * pm_qos_set_value. + * + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing + * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites + */ +static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c) { - return o->target_value; + if (c) + return c->target_value; + else + return 0; } -static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value) +static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c, s32 value) { - o->target_value = value; + c->target_value = value; } -static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, - int del, int value) +static void update_target(struct pm_qos_request *req, + enum pm_qos_req_action action, int value) { unsigned long flags; - int prev_value, curr_value; + int prev_value, curr_value, new_value; + struct pm_qos_object *o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; + struct pm_qos_constraints *c; + + switch (req->class) { + case PM_QOS_DEV_LATENCY: + if (!req->dev) { + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with NULL dev\n"); + return; + } + c = &req->dev->power.latency_constraints; + break; + case PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY: + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY: + case PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT: + c = o->constraints; + break; + case PM_QOS_RESERVED: + default: + WARN(1, KERN_ERR "PM QoS API called with wrong class %d, " + "req 0x%p\n", req->class, req); + return; + } spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags); - prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); - /* PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE is a signal that the value is unchanged */ - if (value != PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) { + + prev_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); + if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) + new_value = c->default_value; + else + new_value = value; + + switch (action) { + case PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ: + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); + break; + case PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ: /* * to change the list, we atomically remove, reinit * with new value and add, then see if the extremal * changed */ - plist_del(node, &o->requests); - plist_node_init(node, value); - plist_add(node, &o->requests); - } else if (del) { - plist_del(node, &o->requests); - } else { - plist_add(node, &o->requests); + plist_del(&req->node, &c->list); + case PM_QOS_ADD_REQ: + plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value); + plist_add(&req->node, &c->list); + break; + default: + /* no action */ + ; } - curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); - pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value); + + curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(c); + pm_qos_set_value(c, curr_value); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); if (prev_value != curr_value) blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers, (unsigned long)curr_value, - NULL); -} - -static int register_pm_qos_misc(struct pm_qos_object *qos) -{ - qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; - qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.name = qos->name; - qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.fops = &pm_qos_power_fops; - - return misc_register(&qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev); -} - -static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) -{ - int pm_qos_class; - - for (pm_qos_class = 0; - pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) { - if (minor == - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor) - return pm_qos_class; - } - return -1; + req); } /** @@ -229,7 +262,7 @@ static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) */ int pm_qos_request(int class) { - return pm_qos_read_value(pm_qos_array[class]); + return pm_qos_read_value(pm_qos_array[class]->constraints); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_request); @@ -254,22 +287,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_request_active); void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, struct pm_qos_parameters *params) { - struct pm_qos_object *o = pm_qos_array[params->class]; - int new_value; - if (pm_qos_request_active(req)) { WARN(1, KERN_ERR "pm_qos_add_request() called for already " "added request\n"); return; } - if (params->value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) - new_value = o->default_value; - else - new_value = params->value; - plist_node_init(&req->list, new_value); + req->class = params->class; req->dev = params->dev; - update_target(o, &req->list, 0, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); + update_target(req, PM_QOS_ADD_REQ, params->value); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_add_request); @@ -285,9 +311,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_add_request); */ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, s32 new_value) { - s32 temp; - struct pm_qos_object *o; - if (!req) /*guard against callers passing in null */ return; @@ -296,15 +319,8 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, s32 new_value) return; } - o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; - - if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) - temp = o->default_value; - else - temp = new_value; - - if (temp != req->list.prio) - update_target(o, &req->list, 0, temp); + if (new_value != req->node.prio) + update_target(req, PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, new_value); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request); @@ -318,8 +334,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request); */ void pm_qos_remove_request(struct pm_qos_request *req) { - struct pm_qos_object *o; - if (req == NULL) return; /* silent return to keep pcm code cleaner */ @@ -329,8 +343,8 @@ void pm_qos_remove_request(struct pm_qos_request *req) return; } - o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; - update_target(o, &req->list, 1, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); + update_target(req, PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); + memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_remove_request); @@ -373,6 +387,28 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int class, struct notifier_block *notifier) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_remove_notifier); +static int register_pm_qos_misc(struct pm_qos_object *qos) +{ + qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; + qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.name = qos->name; + qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev.fops = &pm_qos_power_fops; + + return misc_register(&qos->pm_qos_power_miscdev); +} + +static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor) +{ + int pm_qos_class; + + for (pm_qos_class = 0; + pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) { + if (minor == + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor) + return pm_qos_class; + } + return -1; +} + static int pm_qos_power_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) { struct pm_qos_parameters pm_qos_params; @@ -410,7 +446,6 @@ static ssize_t pm_qos_power_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, { s32 value; unsigned long flags; - struct pm_qos_object *o; struct pm_qos_request *req = filp->private_data; if (!req) @@ -418,9 +453,8 @@ static ssize_t pm_qos_power_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, if (!pm_qos_request_active(req)) return -EINVAL; - o = pm_qos_array[req->class]; spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags); - value = pm_qos_get_value(o); + value = pm_qos_get_value(pm_qos_array[req->class]->constraints); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, f_pos, &value, sizeof(s32));