diff mbox

[v5,09/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap1 related macros

Message ID 1312455893-14922-10-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tarun Kanti DebBarma Aug. 4, 2011, 11:04 a.m. UTC 
From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>

mpuio_init() function is defined under #ifdefs. It is required only in case
of MPUIO bank type and only when PM operations are supported by it.
This is applicable only in case of OMAP16xx SoC's MPUIO GPIO bank type.
For all the other cases it is a dummy function. Hence clean up the same
and remove all the OMAP SoC specific #ifdefs.

bank_is_mpuio() is defined as a check to identify if the bank type is MPUIO.
It is not required to define it separately as zero for OMAP2PLUS. Remove this.

Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   19 -------------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Comments

Santosh Shilimkar Aug. 23, 2011, 1:04 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> From: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
>
> mpuio_init() function is defined under #ifdefs. It is required only in case
> of MPUIO bank type and only when PM operations are supported by it.
> This is applicable only in case of OMAP16xx SoC's MPUIO GPIO bank type.
> For all the other cases it is a dummy function. Hence clean up the same
> and remove all the OMAP SoC specific #ifdefs.
>
> bank_is_mpuio() is defined as a check to identify if the bank type is MPUIO.
> It is not required to define it separately as zero for OMAP2PLUS. Remove this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>

Looks good though it can be cleaned up in the patch where
'bank_is_mpuio()' introduced.

Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Regards
Santosh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index 996e54b..e841ac1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -778,14 +778,8 @@  static struct irq_chip gpio_irq_chip = {
 
 /*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1
-
 #define bank_is_mpuio(bank)	((bank)->method == METHOD_MPUIO)
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX
-
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-
 static int omap_mpuio_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -847,17 +841,6 @@  static inline void mpuio_init(struct gpio_bank *bank)
 		(void) platform_device_register(&omap_mpuio_device);
 }
 
-#else
-static inline void mpuio_init(struct gpio_bank *bank) {}
-#endif	/* 16xx */
-
-#else
-
-#define bank_is_mpuio(bank)	0
-static inline void mpuio_init(struct gpio_bank *bank) {}
-
-#endif
-
 /*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
 /* REVISIT these are stupid implementations!  replace by ones that
@@ -1078,10 +1061,8 @@  static void __devinit omap_gpio_chip_init(struct gpio_bank *bank)
 	bank->chip.to_irq = gpio_2irq;
 	if (bank_is_mpuio(bank)) {
 		bank->chip.label = "mpuio";
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX
 		if (bank->regs->wkup_status)
 			bank->chip.dev = &omap_mpuio_device.dev;
-#endif
 		bank->chip.base = OMAP_MPUIO(0);
 	} else {
 		bank->chip.label = "gpio";