From patchwork Thu Jul 19 14:38:00 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shubhrajyoti Datta X-Patchwork-Id: 1217411 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-omap@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600913FD48 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751420Ab2GSOma (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:42:30 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:35936 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752612Ab2GSOm2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:42:28 -0400 Received: from dbdp20.itg.ti.com ([172.24.170.38]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q6JEcRXZ031800; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:38:28 -0500 Received: from DBDE71.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dbdp20.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6JEcPIh003813; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:08:27 +0530 (IST) Received: from dbdp32.itg.ti.com (172.24.170.251) by DBDE71.ent.ti.com (172.24.170.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:08:26 +0530 Received: from ula0393217.india.ti.com (smtpvbd.itg.ti.com [172.24.170.250]) by dbdp32.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6JEcLWR030469; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:08:26 +0530 From: Shubhrajyoti D To: CC: , , , , , Felipe Balbi , Shubhrajyoti D Subject: [PATCHv5 10/18] i2c: omap: ack IRQ in parts Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:08:00 +0530 Message-ID: <1342708688-2342-11-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 In-Reply-To: <1342708688-2342-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> References: <1342708688-2342-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org From: Felipe Balbi According to flow diagrams on OMAP TRMs, we should ACK the IRQ as they happen. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi [ack the stat OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL in case of arbitration lost] Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D --- v5 - ack the OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c index 78fc274..62ad126 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c @@ -847,21 +847,19 @@ omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) } complete: - /* - * Ack the stat in one go, but [R/X]DR and [R/X]RDY should be - * acked after the data operation is complete. - * Ref: TRM SWPU114Q Figure 18-31 - */ - omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG, stat & - ~(OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR | - OMAP_I2C_STAT_XRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_XDR)); - - if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK) + if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK) { err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK; + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK); + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err); + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL) { dev_err(dev->dev, "Arbitration lost\n"); err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL; + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL); + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err); + return IRQ_HANDLED; } /* @@ -938,12 +936,18 @@ complete: if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR) { dev_err(dev->dev, "Receive overrun\n"); - dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR; + err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR; + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR); + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err); + return IRQ_HANDLED; } if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF) { dev_err(dev->dev, "Transmit underflow\n"); - dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF; + err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF; + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF); + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err); + return IRQ_HANDLED; } } while (stat);