| Message ID | 1360336306-18277-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 08:41:44PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Commit 1416408d {ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions > across OMAP2, 3, 4} moved suspend code to common place but now with > that change, for DT build on OMAP4, suspend hooks are not getting > registered which results in no suspend support. > > The DT return condition is limited to PMIC and smartreflex > initialization and hence restrict it so that suspend ops gets > registered. > > Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> makes sense to me, we still need to set the global suspend_ops pointer to something valid in DT boots: Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c > index f4b3143..1ec4299 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c > @@ -345,19 +345,19 @@ int __init omap2_common_pm_late_init(void) > * a completely different mechanism. > * Disable this part if a DT blob is available. > */ > - if (of_have_populated_dt()) > - return 0; > + if (!of_have_populated_dt()) { > > - /* Init the voltage layer */ > - omap_pmic_late_init(); > - omap_voltage_late_init(); > + /* Init the voltage layer */ > + omap_pmic_late_init(); > + omap_voltage_late_init(); > > - /* Initialize the voltages */ > - omap3_init_voltages(); > - omap4_init_voltages(); > + /* Initialize the voltages */ > + omap3_init_voltages(); > + omap4_init_voltages(); > > - /* Smartreflex device init */ > - omap_devinit_smartreflex(); > + /* Smartreflex device init */ > + omap_devinit_smartreflex(); > + } > > #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND > suspend_set_ops(&omap_pm_ops); > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Commit 1416408d {ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions > across OMAP2, 3, 4} moved suspend code to common place but now with > that change, for DT build on OMAP4, suspend hooks are not getting > registered which results in no suspend support. > > The DT return condition is limited to PMIC and smartreflex > initialization and hence restrict it so that suspend ops gets > registered. > > Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Thanks, queued here with Felipe's Reviewed-by: along with the other OMAP4 PM fixes. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Friday 08 February 2013 09:04 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> Commit 1416408d {ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions >> across OMAP2, 3, 4} moved suspend code to common place but now with >> that change, for DT build on OMAP4, suspend hooks are not getting >> registered which results in no suspend support. >> >> The DT return condition is limited to PMIC and smartreflex >> initialization and hence restrict it so that suspend ops gets >> registered. >> >> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> > > Thanks, queued here with Felipe's Reviewed-by: along with the other OMAP4 > PM fixes. > Thanks Paul !! Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c index f4b3143..1ec4299 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c @@ -345,19 +345,19 @@ int __init omap2_common_pm_late_init(void) * a completely different mechanism. * Disable this part if a DT blob is available. */ - if (of_have_populated_dt()) - return 0; + if (!of_have_populated_dt()) { - /* Init the voltage layer */ - omap_pmic_late_init(); - omap_voltage_late_init(); + /* Init the voltage layer */ + omap_pmic_late_init(); + omap_voltage_late_init(); - /* Initialize the voltages */ - omap3_init_voltages(); - omap4_init_voltages(); + /* Initialize the voltages */ + omap3_init_voltages(); + omap4_init_voltages(); - /* Smartreflex device init */ - omap_devinit_smartreflex(); + /* Smartreflex device init */ + omap_devinit_smartreflex(); + } #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND suspend_set_ops(&omap_pm_ops);
Commit 1416408d {ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions across OMAP2, 3, 4} moved suspend code to common place but now with that change, for DT build on OMAP4, suspend hooks are not getting registered which results in no suspend support. The DT return condition is limited to PMIC and smartreflex initialization and hence restrict it so that suspend ops gets registered. Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)