diff mbox

[v3,08/12] dma: edma: Add one more required slot to MAX slots

Message ID 1375719297-12871-9-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Joel Fernandes Aug. 5, 2013, 4:14 p.m. UTC
We'd now need a separate slot just for the channel and separate
ones for the 2 linked sets, so we make adjustments to allocate
an extra channel accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com>
---
 drivers/dma/edma.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Sekhar Nori Aug. 12, 2013, 5:56 a.m. UTC | #1
On Monday 05 August 2013 09:44 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> We'd now need a separate slot just for the channel and separate
> ones for the 2 linked sets, so we make adjustments to allocate
> an extra channel accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com>

No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where
you include the two linked sets.

> ---
>  drivers/dma/edma.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> index a242269..df50a04 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
>  
>  /* Max of 16 segments per channel to conserve PaRAM slots */
>  #define MAX_NR_SG		16
> -#define EDMA_MAX_SLOTS		MAX_NR_SG
> +#define EDMA_MAX_SLOTS		(MAX_NR_SG+1)
>  #define EDMA_DESCRIPTORS	16
>  
>  struct edma_desc {
> @@ -311,6 +311,9 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *edma_prep_slave_sg(
>  
>  	num_slots_needed = sg_len > MAX_NR_SG ? MAX_NR_SG : sg_len;
>  
> +	/* Allocate one extra to account for the channel itself */
> +	num_slots_needed++;

You can do:

	nslots = min(MAX_NR_SG, sg_len) + 1;

Thanks,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mark Brown Aug. 12, 2013, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:

> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where
> you include the two linked sets.

Can you guys please think about the CC lists you're using for these
patch serieses?  I've certainly no interest in random patches to the
DaVinci DMA controllers, and I suspect the same is true for most of the
people on the CC list.
Joel Fernandes Aug. 12, 2013, 6:19 p.m. UTC | #3
On 08/12/2013 08:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> 
>> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where
>> you include the two linked sets.
> 
> Can you guys please think about the CC lists you're using for these
> patch serieses?  I've certainly no interest in random patches to the
> DaVinci DMA controllers, and I suspect the same is true for most of the
> people on the CC list.
> 

Sorry. I was actually getting a sense of this. What I did initially was
I copied the CC list from last years work on the same series hoping that
it would be a complete mail chain. Bad judgement on my part.
I should have paid more attention to Mark's rants about his inbox
getting spammed with this series in those old threads ;)

I guess moving forward I will use get_maintainer.pl and refine my
git-send scripts with only interested folks. Any words of advice on when
to and when not to CC someone remotely connected to a series is welcome.

@Sekhar, let's keep only linux-omap, linux-davinci and few other
interested folks on the CC chain for the rest of review on the series.

Thanks,

-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Joel Fernandes Aug. 13, 2013, 1:08 a.m. UTC | #4
On 08/12/2013 12:56 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 05 August 2013 09:44 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> We'd now need a separate slot just for the channel and separate
>> ones for the 2 linked sets, so we make adjustments to allocate
>> an extra channel accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com>
> 
> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where
> you include the two linked sets.

Ok, I dropped this patch. Anyway, most of this patch has gone away now
because of other changes you suggested.

Thanks,

-Joel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
index a242269..df50a04 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ 
 
 /* Max of 16 segments per channel to conserve PaRAM slots */
 #define MAX_NR_SG		16
-#define EDMA_MAX_SLOTS		MAX_NR_SG
+#define EDMA_MAX_SLOTS		(MAX_NR_SG+1)
 #define EDMA_DESCRIPTORS	16
 
 struct edma_desc {
@@ -311,6 +311,9 @@  static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *edma_prep_slave_sg(
 
 	num_slots_needed = sg_len > MAX_NR_SG ? MAX_NR_SG : sg_len;
 
+	/* Allocate one extra to account for the channel itself */
+	num_slots_needed++;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < num_slots_needed; i++) {
 		if (echan->slot[i] < 0) {
 			echan->slot[i] =