@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ should instead register a static mapping that can be used to match PWM
consumers to providers, as given in the following example:
static struct pwm_lookup board_pwm_lookup[] = {
- PWM_LOOKUP("tegra-pwm", 0, "pwm-backlight", NULL),
+ PWM_LOOKUP("tegra-pwm", 0, "pwm-backlight", NULL,
+ 50000, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL),
};
static void __init board_init(void)
@@ -278,12 +278,14 @@ struct pwm_lookup {
enum pwm_polarity polarity;
};
-#define PWM_LOOKUP(_provider, _index, _dev_id, _con_id) \
+#define PWM_LOOKUP(_provider, _index, _dev_id, _con_id, _period, _polarity) \
{ \
.provider = _provider, \
.index = _index, \
.dev_id = _dev_id, \
.con_id = _con_id, \
+ .period = _period, \
+ .polarity = _polarity \
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)
Now that PWM_LOOKUP is not used anymore, modify it to initialize all the members of struct pwm_lookup. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> --- Documentation/pwm.txt | 3 ++- include/linux/pwm.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)