From patchwork Mon Jan 16 10:13:02 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "J, KEERTHY" X-Patchwork-Id: 9518435 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882B56020B for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5621C2843D for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 4918A28443; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:13:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1462843D for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751170AbdAPKNQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:13:16 -0500 Received: from fllnx210.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.17]:49085 "EHLO fllnx210.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750849AbdAPKNP (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:13:15 -0500 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllnx210.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v0GADCO4016591; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:13:12 -0600 Received: from DFLE73.ent.ti.com (dfle73.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.110]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v0GADChf017950; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:13:12 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DFLE73.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:13:12 -0600 Received: from ula0393675.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v0GAD9Uw006890; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:13:10 -0600 From: Keerthy To: CC: , , , , , Subject: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Remove CPU_THERMAL Dependency from TI_THERMAL Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:43:02 +0530 Message-ID: <1484561582-5101-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Currently when CPU_THERMAL is not defined the thermal sensors are not even exposed consequently no cooling is possible. CPU_THERMAL eventually depends on CPUFREQ. CPPUFREQ is not the only cooling for CPU. The thermal shutdown for critical temperatures is another cooling solution which will currently not get enabled if CPU_THERMAL is not defined. Remove this dependency so as to have the last level of thermal protection working even without CPUFREQ defined. Signed-off-by: Keerthy --- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig index ea8283f..fe0e877 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ config TI_SOC_THERMAL config TI_THERMAL bool "Texas Instruments SoCs thermal framework support" depends on TI_SOC_THERMAL - depends on CPU_THERMAL help If you say yes here you want to get support for generic thermal framework for the Texas Instruments on die bandgap temperature sensor.