@@ -503,8 +503,7 @@ static void tps6586x_print_version(struct i2c_client *client, int version)
dev_info(&client->dev, "Found %s, VERSIONCRC is %02x\n", name, version);
}
-static int tps6586x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int tps6586x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct tps6586x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
struct tps6586x *tps6586x;
@@ -594,20 +593,13 @@ static int tps6586x_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
return 0;
}
-static const struct i2c_device_id tps6586x_id_table[] = {
- { "tps6586x", 0 },
- { },
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps6586x_id_table);
-
static struct i2c_driver tps6586x_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "tps6586x",
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tps6586x_of_match),
},
- .probe = tps6586x_i2c_probe,
+ .probe_new = tps6586x_i2c_probe,
.remove = tps6586x_i2c_remove,
- .id_table = tps6586x_id_table,
};
static int __init tps6586x_init(void)
With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new instead of probe. Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> --- Compile tested. drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)