@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int lp3943_update_bits(struct lp3943 *lp3943, u8 reg, u8 mask, u8 data)
.max_register = LP3943_MAX_REGISTERS,
};
-static int lp3943_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int lp3943_probe(struct i2c_client *cl)
{
struct lp3943 *lp3943;
struct device *dev = &cl->dev;
@@ -128,12 +128,6 @@ static int lp3943_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
NULL, 0, NULL);
}
-static const struct i2c_device_id lp3943_ids[] = {
- { "lp3943", 0 },
- { }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lp3943_ids);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id lp3943_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "ti,lp3943", },
@@ -143,12 +137,11 @@ static int lp3943_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
#endif
static struct i2c_driver lp3943_driver = {
- .probe = lp3943_probe,
+ .probe_new = lp3943_probe,
.driver = {
.name = "lp3943",
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(lp3943_of_match),
},
- .id_table = lp3943_ids,
};
module_i2c_driver(lp3943_driver);
With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new instead of probe. Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> --- Compile tested. drivers/mfd/lp3943.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)