Message ID | 20150215173216.GA8660@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Sebastian, * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> [150215 09:35]: > This reverts commit 0aa525d11859c1a4d5b78fdc704148e2ae03ae13. > > The conditional RX-FIFO read seems to cause spurious interrupts and we > see just: > |serial8250: too much work for irq29 > > The previous behaviour was "default" for decades and Marvell's 88f6282 SoC > might not be the only that relies on it. Therefore the Omap fix is > reverted for now. > > Fixes: 0aa525d11859 ("tty: serial: 8250_core: read only RX if there is > something in the FIFO") > Reported-By: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> > Debuged-By: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> > --- > * Russell King - ARM Linux | 2015-02-13 23:15:19 [+0000]: > > >On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 07:51:16PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> Something like this maybe? > > > >My personal feeling is that as 0aa525d11859 was wrong, it should be > >reverted and this should be another attempt to fix the problem. In > >other words, there should be two patches, one a revert of the previously > >known bad commit and this one having another go at it. > > > >I feel that would be a better approach, since then we don't end up > >with this change building on a previously know buggy change. It > >would also make the changes to this solution from the previous, > >known-to-work-for-decades code more obvious. > > Okay. So here is the revert. After the revert looks like now we get the following on omaps with 8250.. Do you have a fix available somewhere on top of your revert? Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1028) at 0xfa06a000 ... [<c04217e8>] (mem_serial_in) from [<c0425480>] (serial8250_do_startup+0xe4/0x694) [<c0425480>] (serial8250_do_startup) from [<c0427e48>] (omap_8250_startup+0x70/0x144) [<c0427e48>] (omap_8250_startup) from [<c0425a54>] (serial8250_startup+0x24/0x30) [<c0425a54>] (serial8250_startup) from [<c04208e4>] (uart_startup.part.14+0x8c/0x1a0) [<c04208e4>] (uart_startup.part.14) from [<c0420fec>] (uart_open+0xd8/0x134) [<c0420fec>] (uart_open) from [<c0403e50>] (tty_open+0xdc/0x5e0) [<c0403e50>] (tty_open) from [<c018f008>] (chrdev_open+0xac/0x188) ... Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c index e3b9570a1eff..deae122c9c4b 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c @@ -2138,8 +2138,8 @@ int serial8250_do_startup(struct uart_port *port) /* * Clear the interrupt registers. */ - if (serial_port_in(port, UART_LSR) & UART_LSR_DR) - serial_port_in(port, UART_RX); + serial_port_in(port, UART_LSR); + serial_port_in(port, UART_RX); serial_port_in(port, UART_IIR); serial_port_in(port, UART_MSR); @@ -2300,8 +2300,8 @@ int serial8250_do_startup(struct uart_port *port) * saved flags to avoid getting false values from polling * routines or the previous session. */ - if (serial_port_in(port, UART_LSR) & UART_LSR_DR) - serial_port_in(port, UART_RX); + serial_port_in(port, UART_LSR); + serial_port_in(port, UART_RX); serial_port_in(port, UART_IIR); serial_port_in(port, UART_MSR); up->lsr_saved_flags = 0; @@ -2394,8 +2394,7 @@ void serial8250_do_shutdown(struct uart_port *port) * Read data port to reset things, and then unlink from * the IRQ chain. */ - if (serial_port_in(port, UART_LSR) & UART_LSR_DR) - serial_port_in(port, UART_RX); + serial_port_in(port, UART_RX); serial8250_rpm_put(up); del_timer_sync(&up->timer);