diff mbox

[8/9] dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Use enum for crossbar type

Message ID 20160916083324.29133-9-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Peter Ujfalusi Sept. 16, 2016, 8:33 a.m. UTC
Fixes compiler warning on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
 drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Vinod Koul Sept. 21, 2016, 3:52 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Fixes compiler warning on 64bit architectures.

Would be good to give the warning message here

> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
> index e4f3bd1ae264..876e4ccaf033 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/of_dma.h>
>  
> -#define TI_XBAR_DRA7		0
> -#define TI_XBAR_AM335X		1
> +enum ti_xbar_type {
> +	TI_XBAR_DRA7 = 0,
> +	TI_XBAR_AM335X,
> +};
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id ti_dma_xbar_match[] = {
>  	{
> @@ -395,7 +397,7 @@ static int ti_dra7_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	xbar->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	xbar->dmarouter.route_free = ti_dra7_xbar_free;
> -	xbar->dma_offset = (u32)match->data;
> +	xbar->dma_offset = (enum ti_xbar_type)match->data;
>  
>  	mutex_init(&xbar->mutex);
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, xbar);
> @@ -428,7 +430,7 @@ static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (unlikely(!match))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	switch ((u32)match->data) {
> +	switch ((enum ti_xbar_type)match->data) {
>  	case TI_XBAR_DRA7:
>  		ret = ti_dra7_xbar_probe(pdev);
>  		break;
> -- 
> 2.10.0
>
Peter Ujfalusi Sept. 21, 2016, 7:31 a.m. UTC | #2
On 09/21/16 06:52, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Fixes compiler warning on 64bit architectures.
> 
> Would be good to give the warning message here

Let me revert this patch and patch #2 for the eDMA to get the warnings.

I will repost v2 with the updated commit messages.

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> index e4f3bd1ae264..876e4ccaf033 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
>>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_dma.h>
>>  
>> -#define TI_XBAR_DRA7		0
>> -#define TI_XBAR_AM335X		1
>> +enum ti_xbar_type {
>> +	TI_XBAR_DRA7 = 0,
>> +	TI_XBAR_AM335X,
>> +};
>>  
>>  static const struct of_device_id ti_dma_xbar_match[] = {
>>  	{
>> @@ -395,7 +397,7 @@ static int ti_dra7_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  	xbar->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	xbar->dmarouter.route_free = ti_dra7_xbar_free;
>> -	xbar->dma_offset = (u32)match->data;
>> +	xbar->dma_offset = (enum ti_xbar_type)match->data;
>>  
>>  	mutex_init(&xbar->mutex);
>>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, xbar);
>> @@ -428,7 +430,7 @@ static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (unlikely(!match))
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  
>> -	switch ((u32)match->data) {
>> +	switch ((enum ti_xbar_type)match->data) {
>>  	case TI_XBAR_DRA7:
>>  		ret = ti_dra7_xbar_probe(pdev);
>>  		break;
>> -- 
>> 2.10.0
>>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
index e4f3bd1ae264..876e4ccaf033 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
@@ -16,8 +16,10 @@ 
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/of_dma.h>
 
-#define TI_XBAR_DRA7		0
-#define TI_XBAR_AM335X		1
+enum ti_xbar_type {
+	TI_XBAR_DRA7 = 0,
+	TI_XBAR_AM335X,
+};
 
 static const struct of_device_id ti_dma_xbar_match[] = {
 	{
@@ -395,7 +397,7 @@  static int ti_dra7_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	xbar->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	xbar->dmarouter.route_free = ti_dra7_xbar_free;
-	xbar->dma_offset = (u32)match->data;
+	xbar->dma_offset = (enum ti_xbar_type)match->data;
 
 	mutex_init(&xbar->mutex);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, xbar);
@@ -428,7 +430,7 @@  static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (unlikely(!match))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	switch ((u32)match->data) {
+	switch ((enum ti_xbar_type)match->data) {
 	case TI_XBAR_DRA7:
 		ret = ti_dra7_xbar_probe(pdev);
 		break;