diff mbox

[RESEND] dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Correct am335x/am43xx mux value type

Message ID 20171108100225.25024-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Peter Ujfalusi Nov. 8, 2017, 10:02 a.m. UTC
The used 0x1f mask is only valid for am335x family of SoC, different family
using this type of crossbar might have different number of electable
events. In case of am43xx family 0x3f mask should have been used for
example.
Instead of trying to handle each family's mask, just use u8 type to store
the mux value since the event offsets are aligned to byte offset.

Fixes: 42dbdcc6bf965 ("dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Add support for crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx")
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
Vinod,

this patch somehow got missed, I have sent it in May:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9736747/

Regards,
Peter

 drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Vinod Koul Nov. 8, 2017, 2:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:02:25PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> The used 0x1f mask is only valid for am335x family of SoC, different family
> using this type of crossbar might have different number of electable
> events. In case of am43xx family 0x3f mask should have been used for
> example.
> Instead of trying to handle each family's mask, just use u8 type to store
> the mux value since the event offsets are aligned to byte offset.
> 
> Fixes: 42dbdcc6bf965 ("dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Add support for crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> Vinod,
> 
> this patch somehow got missed, I have sent it in May:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9736747/

not sure how, but applied now
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
index f1d04b70ee67..7df910e7c348 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
@@ -49,12 +49,12 @@  struct ti_am335x_xbar_data {
 
 struct ti_am335x_xbar_map {
 	u16 dma_line;
-	u16 mux_val;
+	u8 mux_val;
 };
 
-static inline void ti_am335x_xbar_write(void __iomem *iomem, int event, u16 val)
+static inline void ti_am335x_xbar_write(void __iomem *iomem, int event, u8 val)
 {
-	writeb_relaxed(val & 0x1f, iomem + event);
+	writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + event);
 }
 
 static void ti_am335x_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@  static void *ti_am335x_xbar_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
 	}
 
 	map->dma_line = (u16)dma_spec->args[0];
-	map->mux_val = (u16)dma_spec->args[2];
+	map->mux_val = (u8)dma_spec->args[2];
 
 	dma_spec->args[2] = 0;
 	dma_spec->args_count = 2;