From patchwork Wed Apr 7 15:56:40 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 12188793 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F524C43460 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5FD61262 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1353967AbhDGP5P (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:57:15 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:52412 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1353963AbhDGP5O (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:57:14 -0400 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137Fuv2M116694; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1617811017; bh=lOwAl47wlPJVft+vfoxzycwCK0HQrG3UgumGfK8Po28=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=KNtSgeq3aa588FmSwv19JSBiEhzJZpsLe4s5FO8io2vutKBzIiFU9YuIEoOLbomUx r7ehHeJVRnkH7cPh+D/3wbXfCHlHt2Zrg2ercYdZyrwGUgJq/8ao8PXDLNmfbJ2jCU iMi2evWA/FY4Xl65mlTSk6S0Oqr4/n4Bcswe7F1o= Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (dlee110.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.21]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 137FuvrE045267 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137FuvV9112804; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.37.105]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 137Fuv7D101689; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier CC: Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Jan Kiszka , Vignesh Raghavendra , Lokesh Vutla , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: pru: Fix wrong success return value for fw events Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20210407155641.5501-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org The irq_create_fwspec_mapping() returns a proper virq value on success and 0 upon any failure. The pru_handle_intrmap() treats this as an error and disposes all firmware event mappings correctly, but is returning this incorrect value as is, letting the pru_rproc_start() interpret it as a success and boot the PRU. Fix this by returning an error value back upon any such failure. While at this, revise the error trace to print some meaningful info about the failed event. Fixes: c75c9fdac66e ("remoteproc: pru: Add support for PRU specific interrupt configuration") Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v2: - No changes, picked up Reviewed-by tag v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20210323223839.17464-3-s-anna@ti.com/ drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c index a9d07c0751be..87b43976c51b 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c @@ -339,8 +339,10 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) pru->mapped_irq[i] = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); if (!pru->mapped_irq[i]) { - dev_err(dev, "failed to get virq\n"); - ret = pru->mapped_irq[i]; + dev_err(dev, "failed to get virq for fw mapping %d: event %d chnl %d host %d\n", + i, fwspec.param[0], fwspec.param[1], + fwspec.param[2]); + ret = -EINVAL; goto map_fail; } }