diff mbox series

[-next] ompfb: video: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() instead of spin_lock_init() in apply.c

Message ID 20210409093756.172155-1-yujiahua1@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [-next] ompfb: video: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() instead of spin_lock_init() in apply.c | expand

Commit Message

Yu Jiahua April 9, 2021, 9:37 a.m. UTC
spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().

Signed-off-by: Yu Jiahua <yujiahua1@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c
index c71021091828..acca991c7540 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@  static struct {
 } dss_data;
 
 /* protects dss_data */
-static spinlock_t data_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(data_lock);
 /* lock for blocking functions */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(apply_lock);
 static DECLARE_COMPLETION(extra_updated_completion);
@@ -131,8 +131,6 @@  static void apply_init_priv(void)
 	struct mgr_priv_data *mp;
 	int i;
 
-	spin_lock_init(&data_lock);
-
 	for (i = 0; i < num_ovls; ++i) {
 		struct ovl_priv_data *op;