diff mbox

[CFT,03/11] mmc: omap_hsmmc: remove private DMA API implementation

Message ID 87vchvl22f.fsf@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Kevin Hilman July 10, 2012, 9:48 p.m. UTC
Hi Russell,

Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:

> Remove the private DMA API implementation from omap_hsmmc, making it
> use entirely the DMA engine API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

While testing this, I noticed a minor problem in the case of probe
failure (e.g. if dmaengine is not built into the kernel.)

The current driver suffers from this same problem but should probably be
fixed when converting to dmaengine...

[...]

> @@ -2048,36 +1919,28 @@ static int __devinit omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "cannot get DMA TX channel\n");
>  		goto err_irq;
>  	}
> -	host->dma_line_tx = res->start;
> +	tx_req = res->start;
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, "rx");
>  	if (!res) {
>  		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "cannot get DMA RX channel\n");
>  		goto err_irq;
>  	}
> -	host->dma_line_rx = res->start;
> +	rx_req = res->start;
>  
> -	{
> -		dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> -		unsigned sig;
> -		extern bool omap_dma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param);
> -
> -		dma_cap_zero(mask);
> -		dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
> -#if 1
> -		sig = host->dma_line_rx;
> -		host->rx_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig);
> -		if (!host->rx_chan) {
> -			dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel %u\n", sig);
> -		}
> -#endif
> -#if 1
> -		sig = host->dma_line_tx;
> -		host->tx_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig);
> -		if (!host->tx_chan) {
> -			dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "unable to obtain TX DMA engine channel %u\n", sig);
> -		}
> -#endif
> +	dma_cap_zero(mask);
> +	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
> +
> +	host->rx_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &rx_req);
> +	if (!host->rx_chan) {
> +		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel %u\n", rx_req);
> +		goto err_irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	host->tx_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &tx_req);
> +	if (!host->tx_chan) {
> +		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "unable to obtain TX DMA engine channel %u\n", tx_req);
> +		goto err_irq;
>  	}

If either of these fails, ret is zero so even though this results in a
failed probe, the return value (ret) is zero meaning the driver still
gets bound to the device.

The patch below fixes this and applies on your 'for-next' branch.  Or,
feel free to fold this into the original if you prefer.

Kevin

From af7537997b46ee3991985fecd4b4a302bdc0df31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:30:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: ensure probe returns error if DMA channel
 request fails

If dma_request_channel() fails (e.g. because DMA engine is not built
into the kernel), the return value from probe is zero causing the
driver to be bound to the device even though probe failed.

To fix, ensure that probe returns an error value when a DMA channel
request fail.

Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
index 2338703..ddcecf8 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -1924,12 +1924,14 @@  static int __devinit omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	host->rx_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &rx_req);
 	if (!host->rx_chan) {
 		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel %u\n", rx_req);
+		ret = -ENXIO;
 		goto err_irq;
 	}
 
 	host->tx_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &tx_req);
 	if (!host->tx_chan) {
 		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "unable to obtain TX DMA engine channel %u\n", tx_req);
+		ret -ENXIO;
 		goto err_irq;
 	}