Message ID | FCCFB4CDC6E5564B9182F639FC3560870370A4D8EF@dbde02.ent.ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Kevin Hilman |
Headers | show |
"Koyamangalath, Abhilash" <abhilash.kv@ti.com> writes: > powerdomains3xxx_data.c defines core_3xxx_pre_es3_1_pwrdm and > core_3xxx_es3_1_pwrdm to take care of differences in "core_pwrdm" > implementations across revisions. > However,_pwrdm_lookup("core_pwrdm") always matches the first definition for > 3630 ES 1.1 and 1.2 which is incorrect. This patch fixes this issue by adding > code to match silicon revision as well while looking up "core_pwrdm" in > _pwrdm_lookup(). > core_3xxx_es3_1_pwrdm is different from core_3xxx_pre_es3_1_pwrdm in > that the former adds hardware save-restore support for USBTLL for 3430 > ES3.1 and for 3630 ES1.1 and ES1.2. > However,with this change, issuing a standby command (by suspending to RAM) > seems to crash the system on a 3630 ES1.2., with or without the USB support > enabled. > I'm not very sure about how the USBTLL setting effects the suspend operation of > the rest of the system. Checkpatch reports: total: 17 errors, 16 warnings, 29 lines checked Please fix punctuation, spacing, line-wrapping in changelog for readability. The CPU rev is also used on other 34xx SoCs, please check for those too. Kevin > > Signed-off-by: Abhilash K V <abhilash.kv@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c > index eaed0df..cc2b6e6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > #include "powerdomain.h" > #include "clockdomain.h" > #include <plat/prcm.h> > +#include <plat/cpu.h> > > #include "pm.h" > > @@ -53,6 +54,22 @@ static struct powerdomain *_pwrdm_lookup(const char *name) > > list_for_each_entry(temp_pwrdm, &pwrdm_list, node) { > if (!strcmp(name, temp_pwrdm->name)) { > + if (!strcmp(name, "core_pwrdm") && cpu_is_omap3630()) { > + if (omap_rev() > OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0) { > + /* > + * match omap_chip info for OMAP3630 Rev ES1.1, > + * ES1.2 or higher > + */ > + if (!(temp_pwrdm->omap_chip.oc > + & CHIP_GE_OMAP3630ES1_1)) > + continue; > + } else { > + /* match omap_chip info for OMAP3630 Rev ES1.0 */ > + if (!(temp_pwrdm->omap_chip.oc > + & CHIP_IS_OMAP3630ES1)) > + continue; > + } > + } > pwrdm = temp_pwrdm; > break; > } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c index eaed0df..cc2b6e6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include "powerdomain.h" #include "clockdomain.h" #include <plat/prcm.h> +#include <plat/cpu.h> #include "pm.h" @@ -53,6 +54,22 @@ static struct powerdomain *_pwrdm_lookup(const char *name) list_for_each_entry(temp_pwrdm, &pwrdm_list, node) { if (!strcmp(name, temp_pwrdm->name)) { + if (!strcmp(name, "core_pwrdm") && cpu_is_omap3630()) { + if (omap_rev() > OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0) { + /* + * match omap_chip info for OMAP3630 Rev ES1.1, + * ES1.2 or higher + */ + if (!(temp_pwrdm->omap_chip.oc + & CHIP_GE_OMAP3630ES1_1)) + continue; + } else { + /* match omap_chip info for OMAP3630 Rev ES1.0 */ + if (!(temp_pwrdm->omap_chip.oc + & CHIP_IS_OMAP3630ES1)) + continue; + } + } pwrdm = temp_pwrdm; break; }
powerdomains3xxx_data.c defines core_3xxx_pre_es3_1_pwrdm and core_3xxx_es3_1_pwrdm to take care of differences in "core_pwrdm" implementations across revisions. However,_pwrdm_lookup("core_pwrdm") always matches the first definition for 3630 ES 1.1 and 1.2 which is incorrect. This patch fixes this issue by adding code to match silicon revision as well while looking up "core_pwrdm" in _pwrdm_lookup(). core_3xxx_es3_1_pwrdm is different from core_3xxx_pre_es3_1_pwrdm in that the former adds hardware save-restore support for USBTLL for 3430 ES3.1 and for 3630 ES1.1 and ES1.2. However,with this change, issuing a standby command (by suspending to RAM) seems to crash the system on a 3630 ES1.2., with or without the USB support enabled. I'm not very sure about how the USBTLL setting effects the suspend operation of the rest of the system. Signed-off-by: Abhilash K V <abhilash.kv@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)