@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rdr_tbl_ent {
static int perf_processor_interface __read_mostly = UNKNOWN_INTF;
static int perf_enabled __read_mostly;
-static spinlock_t perf_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(perf_lock);
struct parisc_device *cpu_device __read_mostly;
/* RDRs to write for PCX-W */
@@ -533,8 +533,6 @@ static int __init perf_init(void)
/* Patch the images to match the system */
perf_patch_images();
- spin_lock_init(&perf_lock);
-
/* TODO: this only lets us access the first cpu.. what to do for SMP? */
cpu_device = per_cpu(cpu_data, 0).dev;
printk("Performance monitoring counters enabled for %s\n",
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
extern struct unwind_table_entry __start___unwind[];
extern struct unwind_table_entry __stop___unwind[];
-static spinlock_t unwind_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(unwind_lock);
/*
* the kernel unwind block is not dynamically allocated so that
* we can call unwind_init as early in the bootup process as
@@ -181,8 +181,6 @@ int __init unwind_init(void)
start = (long)&__start___unwind[0];
stop = (long)&__stop___unwind[0];
- spin_lock_init(&unwind_lock);
-
printk("unwind_init: start = 0x%lx, end = 0x%lx, entries = %lu\n",
start, stop,
(stop - start) / sizeof(struct unwind_table_entry));
While testing UBSAN I saw this BUG: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0 in unwind code. Let's avoid that by static initialization. Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html