From patchwork Tue Oct 29 16:58:30 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Rutland X-Patchwork-Id: 11218287 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CF3112B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC0720679 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727279AbfJ2Q7T (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:59:19 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:54704 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390606AbfJ2Q7S (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:59:18 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E566625; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E621F3F71F; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.kachhap@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, deller@gmx.de, duwe@suse.de, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, james.morse@arm.com, jeyu@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jthierry@redhat.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, svens@stackframe.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, will@kernel.org Subject: [PATCHv2 6/8] arm64: asm-offsets: add S_FP Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:58:30 +0000 Message-Id: <20191029165832.33606-7-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20191029165832.33606-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20191029165832.33606-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org So that assembly code can more easily manipulate the FP (x29) within a pt_regs, add an S_FP asm-offsets definition. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c index 214685760e1c..a5bdce8af65b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ int main(void) DEFINE(S_X24, offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[24])); DEFINE(S_X26, offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[26])); DEFINE(S_X28, offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[28])); + DEFINE(S_FP, offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[29])); DEFINE(S_LR, offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[30])); DEFINE(S_SP, offsetof(struct pt_regs, sp)); DEFINE(S_PSTATE, offsetof(struct pt_regs, pstate));