Message ID | 20201210194044.065003856@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Headers | show |
Series | genirq: Treewide hunt for irq descriptor abuse and assorted fixes | expand |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:42 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > Let the core code do the fiddling with irq_desc. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> I suppose you will funnel this directly to Torvalds, else tell me and I'll apply it to my tree. Yours, Linus Walleij
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/nomadik/pinctrl-nomadik.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/nomadik/pinctrl-nomadik.c @@ -948,7 +948,6 @@ static void nmk_gpio_dbg_show_one(struct (mode < 0) ? "unknown" : modes[mode]); } else { int irq = chip->to_irq(chip, offset); - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); const int pullidx = pull ? 1 : 0; int val; static const char * const pulls[] = { @@ -969,7 +968,7 @@ static void nmk_gpio_dbg_show_one(struct * This races with request_irq(), set_irq_type(), * and set_irq_wake() ... but those are "rare". */ - if (irq > 0 && desc && desc->action) { + if (irq > 0 && irq_has_action(irq)) { char *trigger; if (nmk_chip->edge_rising & BIT(offset))
Let the core code do the fiddling with irq_desc. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/pinctrl/nomadik/pinctrl-nomadik.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)