Message ID | 1348022442-7816-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 10:40 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: > Since hot plug for pci devices while doing aer inject, some newly created child buses' > pci_ops will be assigned to pci_ops_aer. Aer_inject does not track these pci_ops_aer(not > list in pci_bus_ops_list),we should clean all of these when rmmod aer_inject module. > > Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c > index 442147b..e2400b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c > @@ -299,6 +299,32 @@ static void pci_bus_ops_init(struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops, > bus_ops->ops = ops; > } > > +static void pci_clean_child_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *child; > + > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) { > + if (child->ops == &pci_ops_aer) > + pci_bus_set_ops(child, bus->ops); > + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(child); > + } Why not use pci_walk_bus? > +} > + > +/* find pci_ops_aer from root bus, and replace it by parent bus's pci_ops. > + * pci_ops of root bus won't be pci_ops_aer here*/ > +static void clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(void) > +{ > + struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops; > + > + list_for_each_entry(bus_ops, &pci_bus_ops_list, list) { > + /* the bus with untracked pci_ops_aer always the > + * child bus of root bus tracked in pci_bus_ops_list > + */ > + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus_ops->bus)) > + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(bus_ops->bus); > + } > +} > + > static int pci_bus_set_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > struct pci_ops *ops; > @@ -558,9 +584,18 @@ static void __exit aer_inject_exit(void) > > misc_deregister(&aer_inject_device); > > + /* clean pci_bus_ops tracked in pci_bus_ops_list */ > while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_get(bus_ops))) > pci_bus_set_ops(bus_ops->bus, bus_ops->ops); Why not do clean here inside loop? Best Regards, Huang Ying > > + /* Inject aer errors and hotplug the same pcie device > + * maybe assign some newly created buses' pci_ops pci_ops_aer. > + * Since these pci_ops_aer are not tracked in pci_bus_ops_list, > + * we need to find and clean untracked pci_ops_aer before aer_inject > + * module exit > + */ > + clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(); > + > while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_pop())) > kfree(bus_ops); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2012/9/19 13:57, Huang Ying wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 10:40 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Since hot plug for pci devices while doing aer inject, some newly created child buses' >> pci_ops will be assigned to pci_ops_aer. Aer_inject does not track these pci_ops_aer(not >> list in pci_bus_ops_list),we should clean all of these when rmmod aer_inject module. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c >> index 442147b..e2400b5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c >> @@ -299,6 +299,32 @@ static void pci_bus_ops_init(struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops, >> bus_ops->ops = ops; >> } >> >> +static void pci_clean_child_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + struct pci_bus *child; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) { >> + if (child->ops == &pci_ops_aer) >> + pci_bus_set_ops(child, bus->ops); >> + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(child); >> + } > > Why not use pci_walk_bus? > I think here walk all child buses is enough, pci_walk_bus will walk all child devices under this bus. >> +} >> + >> +/* find pci_ops_aer from root bus, and replace it by parent bus's pci_ops. >> + * pci_ops of root bus won't be pci_ops_aer here*/ >> +static void clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(void) >> +{ >> + struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(bus_ops, &pci_bus_ops_list, list) { >> + /* the bus with untracked pci_ops_aer always the >> + * child bus of root bus tracked in pci_bus_ops_list >> + */ >> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus_ops->bus)) >> + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(bus_ops->bus); >> + } >> +} >> + >> static int pci_bus_set_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) >> { >> struct pci_ops *ops; >> @@ -558,9 +584,18 @@ static void __exit aer_inject_exit(void) >> >> misc_deregister(&aer_inject_device); >> >> + /* clean pci_bus_ops tracked in pci_bus_ops_list */ >> while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_get(bus_ops))) >> pci_bus_set_ops(bus_ops->bus, bus_ops->ops); > > Why not do clean here inside loop? > Because I also need these bus_ops to scan untracked pci_ops_aer. > Best Regards, > Huang Ying > >> >> + /* Inject aer errors and hotplug the same pcie device >> + * maybe assign some newly created buses' pci_ops pci_ops_aer. >> + * Since these pci_ops_aer are not tracked in pci_bus_ops_list, >> + * we need to find and clean untracked pci_ops_aer before aer_inject >> + * module exit >> + */ >> + clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(); >> + >> while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_pop())) >> kfree(bus_ops); >> > > > > . >
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:09 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: > On 2012/9/19 13:57, Huang Ying wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 10:40 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: > >> Since hot plug for pci devices while doing aer inject, some newly created child buses' > >> pci_ops will be assigned to pci_ops_aer. Aer_inject does not track these pci_ops_aer(not > >> list in pci_bus_ops_list),we should clean all of these when rmmod aer_inject module. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c > >> index 442147b..e2400b5 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c > >> @@ -299,6 +299,32 @@ static void pci_bus_ops_init(struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops, > >> bus_ops->ops = ops; > >> } > >> > >> +static void pci_clean_child_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) > >> +{ > >> + struct pci_bus *child; > >> + > >> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) { > >> + if (child->ops == &pci_ops_aer) > >> + pci_bus_set_ops(child, bus->ops); > >> + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(child); > >> + } > > > > Why not use pci_walk_bus? > > > > I think here walk all child buses is enough, pci_walk_bus will walk all child devices under this bus. > > >> +} > >> + > >> +/* find pci_ops_aer from root bus, and replace it by parent bus's pci_ops. > >> + * pci_ops of root bus won't be pci_ops_aer here*/ > >> +static void clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(void) > >> +{ > >> + struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops; > >> + > >> + list_for_each_entry(bus_ops, &pci_bus_ops_list, list) { > >> + /* the bus with untracked pci_ops_aer always the > >> + * child bus of root bus tracked in pci_bus_ops_list > >> + */ > >> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus_ops->bus)) > >> + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(bus_ops->bus); > >> + } > >> +} > >> + > >> static int pci_bus_set_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) > >> { > >> struct pci_ops *ops; > >> @@ -558,9 +584,18 @@ static void __exit aer_inject_exit(void) > >> > >> misc_deregister(&aer_inject_device); > >> > >> + /* clean pci_bus_ops tracked in pci_bus_ops_list */ > >> while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_get(bus_ops))) > >> pci_bus_set_ops(bus_ops->bus, bus_ops->ops); > > > > Why not do clean here inside loop? > > > > Because I also need these bus_ops to scan untracked pci_ops_aer. I mean why not call pci_clean_child_aer_ops() inside loop. Best Regards, Huang Ying > > > >> > >> + /* Inject aer errors and hotplug the same pcie device > >> + * maybe assign some newly created buses' pci_ops pci_ops_aer. > >> + * Since these pci_ops_aer are not tracked in pci_bus_ops_list, > >> + * we need to find and clean untracked pci_ops_aer before aer_inject > >> + * module exit > >> + */ > >> + clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(); > >> + > >> while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_pop())) > >> kfree(bus_ops); > >> > > > > > > > > . > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2012/9/19 14:18, Huang Ying wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:09 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> On 2012/9/19 13:57, Huang Ying wrote: >>> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 10:40 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >>>> Since hot plug for pci devices while doing aer inject, some newly created child buses' >>>> pci_ops will be assigned to pci_ops_aer. Aer_inject does not track these pci_ops_aer(not >>>> list in pci_bus_ops_list),we should clean all of these when rmmod aer_inject module. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c >>>> index 442147b..e2400b5 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c >>>> @@ -299,6 +299,32 @@ static void pci_bus_ops_init(struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops, >>>> bus_ops->ops = ops; >>>> } >>>> >>>> +static void pci_clean_child_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct pci_bus *child; >>>> + >>>> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) { >>>> + if (child->ops == &pci_ops_aer) >>>> + pci_bus_set_ops(child, bus->ops); >>>> + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(child); >>>> + } >>> >>> Why not use pci_walk_bus? >>> >> >> I think here walk all child buses is enough, pci_walk_bus will walk all child devices under this bus. >> >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +/* find pci_ops_aer from root bus, and replace it by parent bus's pci_ops. >>>> + * pci_ops of root bus won't be pci_ops_aer here*/ >>>> +static void clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops; >>>> + >>>> + list_for_each_entry(bus_ops, &pci_bus_ops_list, list) { >>>> + /* the bus with untracked pci_ops_aer always the >>>> + * child bus of root bus tracked in pci_bus_ops_list >>>> + */ >>>> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus_ops->bus)) >>>> + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(bus_ops->bus); >>>> + } >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> static int pci_bus_set_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) >>>> { >>>> struct pci_ops *ops; >>>> @@ -558,9 +584,18 @@ static void __exit aer_inject_exit(void) >>>> >>>> misc_deregister(&aer_inject_device); >>>> >>>> + /* clean pci_bus_ops tracked in pci_bus_ops_list */ >>>> while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_get(bus_ops))) >>>> pci_bus_set_ops(bus_ops->bus, bus_ops->ops); >>> >>> Why not do clean here inside loop? >>> >> >> Because I also need these bus_ops to scan untracked pci_ops_aer. > > I mean why not call pci_clean_child_aer_ops() inside loop. > My idea is first clean all pci_ops_aer tracked in pci_bus_ops_list, second clean all untracked pci_ops_aer. If put pci_clean_child_aer_ops inside loop, when I clean tracked pci_ops_aer for root bus 0, next I will use bus 0 's pci_ops to clean bus 1 's pci_ops_aer. Actually maybe bus 1 have its own pci_ops_aer tracked in pci_bus_ops_list. So I think use every bus's own bus_ops to clean pci_ops_aer first is better. \-[0000:00]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation 5500 I/O Hub to ESI Port +-01.0-[01]--+-00.0 Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet | \-00.1 Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet > Best Regards, > Huang Ying > >>> >>>> >>>> + /* Inject aer errors and hotplug the same pcie device >>>> + * maybe assign some newly created buses' pci_ops pci_ops_aer. >>>> + * Since these pci_ops_aer are not tracked in pci_bus_ops_list, >>>> + * we need to find and clean untracked pci_ops_aer before aer_inject >>>> + * module exit >>>> + */ >>>> + clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(); >>>> + >>>> while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_pop())) >>>> kfree(bus_ops); >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> . >>> >> >> > > > > . >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c index 442147b..e2400b5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c @@ -299,6 +299,32 @@ static void pci_bus_ops_init(struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops, bus_ops->ops = ops; } +static void pci_clean_child_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct pci_bus *child; + + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) { + if (child->ops == &pci_ops_aer) + pci_bus_set_ops(child, bus->ops); + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(child); + } +} + +/* find pci_ops_aer from root bus, and replace it by parent bus's pci_ops. + * pci_ops of root bus won't be pci_ops_aer here*/ +static void clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(void) +{ + struct pci_bus_ops *bus_ops; + + list_for_each_entry(bus_ops, &pci_bus_ops_list, list) { + /* the bus with untracked pci_ops_aer always the + * child bus of root bus tracked in pci_bus_ops_list + */ + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus_ops->bus)) + pci_clean_child_aer_ops(bus_ops->bus); + } +} + static int pci_bus_set_aer_ops(struct pci_bus *bus) { struct pci_ops *ops; @@ -558,9 +584,18 @@ static void __exit aer_inject_exit(void) misc_deregister(&aer_inject_device); + /* clean pci_bus_ops tracked in pci_bus_ops_list */ while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_get(bus_ops))) pci_bus_set_ops(bus_ops->bus, bus_ops->ops); + /* Inject aer errors and hotplug the same pcie device + * maybe assign some newly created buses' pci_ops pci_ops_aer. + * Since these pci_ops_aer are not tracked in pci_bus_ops_list, + * we need to find and clean untracked pci_ops_aer before aer_inject + * module exit + */ + clean_untracked_pci_ops_aer(); + while ((bus_ops = pci_bus_ops_pop())) kfree(bus_ops);
Since hot plug for pci devices while doing aer inject, some newly created child buses' pci_ops will be assigned to pci_ops_aer. Aer_inject does not track these pci_ops_aer(not list in pci_bus_ops_list),we should clean all of these when rmmod aer_inject module. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)