| Message ID | 1437021563-29139-2-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data but ARM64 does not, and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why not?), ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64 uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc. > Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com> > --- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 15 ++++----------- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h | 8 ++++++-- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > index d77481e..8a556d5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ > #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN 0x330 > #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK 0xf > > -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys) > -{ > - return sys->private_data; > -} > - > /** > * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer > * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c > @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, > unsigned int devfn, > int where) > { > - struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata; > - struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys); > + struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata; > unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn); > unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn); > unsigned busno = bus->number; > @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) > > iproc_pcie_reset(pcie); > > - pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie; > - > - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, > - &pcie->sysdata, res); > + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res); > if (!bus) { > dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n"); > ret = -ENOMEM; > @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) > > pci_scan_child_bus(bus); > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus); > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM > pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq); > +#endif > pci_bus_add_devices(bus); > > return 0; > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@ > > /** > * iProc PCIe device > + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of > + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with > + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver > * @dev: pointer to device data structure > * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base > * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources > - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data > * @root_bus: pointer to root bus > * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes > * @irqs: interrupt IDs > */ > struct iproc_pcie { > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM > + struct pci_sys_data sysdata; > +#endif I'm OK with adding #ifdefs to make this work on both ARM and ARM64. We can at least see the ifdefs and know what needs to be fixed. I'm a little more hesitant about adding code that depends on the position of sysdata within struct iproc_pcie. I'd rather have something ugly and robust that cries out for fixing than something minimal and fragile. I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's email on the list. > struct device *dev; > void __iomem *base; > - struct pci_sys_data sysdata; > struct pci_bus *root_bus; > struct phy *phy; > int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS]; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver > > This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data > but ARM64 does not, Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64. and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why > not?), under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c: 41 /* 42 * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device 43 */ 44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) 45 { 46 dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); 47 48 return 0; 49 } interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device for arm64. ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64 > uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc. > Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32 based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata. >> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> >> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com> >> --- >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 15 ++++----------- >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h | 8 ++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c >> index d77481e..8a556d5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c >> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ >> #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN 0x330 >> #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK 0xf >> >> -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys) >> -{ >> - return sys->private_data; >> -} >> - >> /** >> * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer >> * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c >> @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, >> unsigned int devfn, >> int where) >> { >> - struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata; >> - struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys); >> + struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata; >> unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn); >> unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn); >> unsigned busno = bus->number; >> @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) >> >> iproc_pcie_reset(pcie); >> >> - pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie; >> - >> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, >> - &pcie->sysdata, res); >> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res); >> if (!bus) { >> dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n"); >> ret = -ENOMEM; >> @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) >> >> pci_scan_child_bus(bus); >> pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM >> pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq); >> +#endif >> pci_bus_add_devices(bus); >> >> return 0; >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h >> index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h >> @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@ >> >> /** >> * iProc PCIe device >> + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of >> + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with >> + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver >> * @dev: pointer to device data structure >> * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base >> * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources >> - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data >> * @root_bus: pointer to root bus >> * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes >> * @irqs: interrupt IDs >> */ >> struct iproc_pcie { >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM >> + struct pci_sys_data sysdata; >> +#endif > > I'm OK with adding #ifdefs to make this work on both ARM and ARM64. We can > at least see the ifdefs and know what needs to be fixed. I'm a little more > hesitant about adding code that depends on the position of sysdata within > struct iproc_pcie. I'd rather have something ugly and robust that cries > out for fixing than something minimal and fragile. > Yes that was my original code and that was a bit ugly. Arnd proposed this and it does indeed make the look a lot cleaner. But yeah, it now depends on the location of struct pci_sys_data in memory and I see your concern. In fact, I asked exactly the same question to Arnd. Are you okay with living with this for a little while until struct pci_sys_data is eventually removed from arm32? > I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its > original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to > move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's > email on the list. > Sorry maybe you need to elaborate here. Am I supposed to add Arnd's name in the commit message? Other than that, Arnd is on this email thread. >> struct device *dev; >> void __iomem *base; >> - struct pci_sys_data sysdata; >> struct pci_bus *root_bus; >> struct phy *phy; >> int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS]; >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 7/21/2015 1:50 PM, Ray Jui wrote: > > > On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >> I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its >> original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to >> move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's >> email on the list. >> > > Sorry maybe you need to elaborate here. Am I supposed to add Arnd's name > in the commit message? Other than that, Arnd is on this email thread. > For your previous question: when Arnd replied, he only replied to me but did not reply to all, that's why you cannot find his email.... Ray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:50:28PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > > > On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > >> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver > > > > This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data > > but ARM64 does not, > > Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of > removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we > need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64. > > and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why > > not?), > > under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c: > > 41 /* > 42 * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device > 43 */ > 44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > 45 { > 46 dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > 47 > 48 return 0; > 49 } > > interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device > for arm64. > > ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64 > > uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc. > > Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32 > based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata. That all makes sense. I'm just looking for a condensed version of it in the changelog because it takes some digging to figure it out, and in a couple months even the implicit context of "somebody's working to combine arm32 and arm64" will be gone. So we need a changelog that motivates this patch as it is. > >> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 15 ++++----------- > >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h | 8 ++++++-- > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > >> index d77481e..8a556d5 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > >> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ > >> #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN 0x330 > >> #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK 0xf > >> > >> -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys) > >> -{ > >> - return sys->private_data; > >> -} > >> - > >> /** > >> * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer > >> * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c > >> @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, > >> unsigned int devfn, > >> int where) > >> { > >> - struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata; > >> - struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys); > >> + struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata; > >> unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn); > >> unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn); > >> unsigned busno = bus->number; > >> @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) > >> > >> iproc_pcie_reset(pcie); > >> > >> - pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie; > >> - > >> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, > >> - &pcie->sysdata, res); > >> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res); > >> if (!bus) { > >> dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n"); > >> ret = -ENOMEM; > >> @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) > >> > >> pci_scan_child_bus(bus); > >> pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus); > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM > >> pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq); > >> +#endif > >> pci_bus_add_devices(bus); > >> > >> return 0; > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > >> index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > >> @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@ > >> > >> /** > >> * iProc PCIe device > >> + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of > >> + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with > >> + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver > >> * @dev: pointer to device data structure > >> * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base > >> * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources > >> - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data > >> * @root_bus: pointer to root bus > >> * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes > >> * @irqs: interrupt IDs > >> */ > >> struct iproc_pcie { > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM > >> + struct pci_sys_data sysdata; > >> +#endif > > > > I'm OK with adding #ifdefs to make this work on both ARM and ARM64. We can > > at least see the ifdefs and know what needs to be fixed. I'm a little more > > hesitant about adding code that depends on the position of sysdata within > > struct iproc_pcie. I'd rather have something ugly and robust that cries > > out for fixing than something minimal and fragile. > > Yes that was my original code and that was a bit ugly. Arnd proposed > this and it does indeed make the look a lot cleaner. But yeah, it now > depends on the location of struct pci_sys_data in memory and I see your > concern. In fact, I asked exactly the same question to Arnd. > > Are you okay with living with this for a little while until struct > pci_sys_data is eventually removed from arm32? > > > I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its > > original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to > > move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's > > email on the list. > > Sorry maybe you need to elaborate here. Am I supposed to add Arnd's name > in the commit message? Other than that, Arnd is on this email thread. No, I wasn't looking for Arnd's name in the changelog; I was just hoping to read that discussion because it could save me from the embarrassment of suggesting something different than Arnd did :) Personally I'd rather have ugly ifdefs because they make it obvious where the potholes are. But again, I'm sure Arnd has very good reasons if he thinks this is better. > >> struct device *dev; > >> void __iomem *base; > >> - struct pci_sys_data sysdata; > >> struct pci_bus *root_bus; > >> struct phy *phy; > >> int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS]; > >> -- > >> 1.7.9.5 > >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 7/21/2015 3:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:50:28PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >> >> >> On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >>>> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver >>> >>> This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data >>> but ARM64 does not, >> >> Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of >> removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we >> need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64. >> >> and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why >>> not?), >> >> under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c: >> >> 41 /* >> 42 * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device >> 43 */ >> 44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) >> 45 { >> 46 dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); >> 47 >> 48 return 0; >> 49 } >> >> interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device >> for arm64. >> >> ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64 >>> uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc. >> >> Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32 >> based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata. > > That all makes sense. I'm just looking for a condensed version of it in > the changelog because it takes some digging to figure it out, and in a > couple months even the implicit context of "somebody's working to combine > arm32 and arm64" will be gone. So we need a changelog that motivates this > patch as it is. > Okay I will re-submit a new patch with a commit message that explains the change in more details. Thanks, Ray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c index d77481e..8a556d5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN 0x330 #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK 0xf -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys) -{ - return sys->private_data; -} - /** * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where) { - struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata; - struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys); + struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata; unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn); unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn); unsigned busno = bus->number; @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) iproc_pcie_reset(pcie); - pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie; - - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, - &pcie->sysdata, res); + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res); if (!bus) { dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n"); ret = -ENOMEM; @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res) pci_scan_child_bus(bus); pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus); +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq); +#endif pci_bus_add_devices(bus); return 0; diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@ /** * iProc PCIe device + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver * @dev: pointer to device data structure * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data * @root_bus: pointer to root bus * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes * @irqs: interrupt IDs */ struct iproc_pcie { +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM + struct pci_sys_data sysdata; +#endif struct device *dev; void __iomem *base; - struct pci_sys_data sysdata; struct pci_bus *root_bus; struct phy *phy; int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS];