| Message ID | 1455680668-23298-30-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: > This renames traverse_pci_devices() to pci_traverse_device_nodes(). > The function traverses all subordinate device nodes of the specified > one. Also, below cleanup applied to the function. No logical changes > introduced. > > * Rename "pre" to "fn". > * Avoid assignment in if condition reported from checkpatch.pl. > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h | 6 +++--- > arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h > index ca0c5bf..8753e4e 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h > @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ extern struct pci_dev *isa_bridge_pcidev; /* may be NULL if no ISA bus */ > struct device_node; > struct pci_dn; > > -typedef void *(*traverse_func)(struct device_node *me, void *data); Why removing this typedef? Typedef's are good. Anyway, Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > -void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, > - void *data); > +void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, > + void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), > + void *data); > void *traverse_pci_dn(struct pci_dn *root, > void *(*fn)(struct pci_dn *, void *), > void *data); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c > index ce10281..ecdccce 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c > @@ -372,8 +372,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_remove_device_node_info); > * one of these nodes we also assume its siblings are non-pci for > * performance. > */ > -void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, > - void *data) > +void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, > + void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), > + void *data) > { > struct device_node *dn, *nextdn; > void *ret; > @@ -388,8 +389,11 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, > if (classp) > class = of_read_number(classp, 1); > > - if (pre && ((ret = pre(dn, data)) != NULL)) > - return ret; > + if (fn) { > + ret = fn(dn, data); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > > /* If we are a PCI bridge, go down */ > if (dn->child && ((class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI || > @@ -411,6 +415,7 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, > } > return NULL; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_traverse_device_nodes); > > static struct pci_dn *pci_dn_next_one(struct pci_dn *root, > struct pci_dn *pdn) > @@ -487,7 +492,7 @@ void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) > } > > /* Update dn->phb ptrs for new phb and children devices */ > - traverse_pci_devices(dn, add_pdn, phb); > + pci_traverse_device_nodes(dn, add_pdn, phb); > } > > /** > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c > index 272e9ec..543a638 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c > @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) > memset(&counts, 0, sizeof(struct msi_counts)); > > /* Work out how many devices we have below this PE */ > - traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); > + pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); > > if (counts.num_devices == 0) { > pr_err("rtas_msi: found 0 devices under PE for %s\n", > @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) > /* else, we have some more calculating to do */ > counts.requestor = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev); > counts.request = request; > - traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); > + pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); > > /* If the quota isn't an integer multiple of the total, we can > * use the remainder as spare MSIs for anyone that wants them. */ >
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:51:03PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>This renames traverse_pci_devices() to pci_traverse_device_nodes(). >>The function traverses all subordinate device nodes of the specified >>one. Also, below cleanup applied to the function. No logical changes >>introduced. >> >> * Rename "pre" to "fn". >> * Avoid assignment in if condition reported from checkpatch.pl. >> >>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>--- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h | 6 +++--- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 4 ++-- >> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>index ca0c5bf..8753e4e 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ extern struct pci_dev *isa_bridge_pcidev; /* may be NULL if no ISA bus */ >> struct device_node; >> struct pci_dn; >> >>-typedef void *(*traverse_func)(struct device_node *me, void *data); > > > >Why removing this typedef? Typedef's are good. > >Anyway, > Could you please provide more details why it's good? I removed it because it was used for only once. > >Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > > > > >>-void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >>- void *data); >>+void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, >>+ void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), >>+ void *data); >> void *traverse_pci_dn(struct pci_dn *root, >> void *(*fn)(struct pci_dn *, void *), >> void *data); >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>index ce10281..ecdccce 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>@@ -372,8 +372,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_remove_device_node_info); >> * one of these nodes we also assume its siblings are non-pci for >> * performance. >> */ >>-void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >>- void *data) >>+void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, >>+ void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), >>+ void *data) >> { >> struct device_node *dn, *nextdn; >> void *ret; >>@@ -388,8 +389,11 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >> if (classp) >> class = of_read_number(classp, 1); >> >>- if (pre && ((ret = pre(dn, data)) != NULL)) >>- return ret; >>+ if (fn) { >>+ ret = fn(dn, data); >>+ if (ret) >>+ return ret; >>+ } >> >> /* If we are a PCI bridge, go down */ >> if (dn->child && ((class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI || >>@@ -411,6 +415,7 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >> } >> return NULL; >> } >>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_traverse_device_nodes); >> >> static struct pci_dn *pci_dn_next_one(struct pci_dn *root, >> struct pci_dn *pdn) >>@@ -487,7 +492,7 @@ void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) >> } >> >> /* Update dn->phb ptrs for new phb and children devices */ >>- traverse_pci_devices(dn, add_pdn, phb); >>+ pci_traverse_device_nodes(dn, add_pdn, phb); >> } >> >> /** >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c >>index 272e9ec..543a638 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c >>@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) >> memset(&counts, 0, sizeof(struct msi_counts)); >> >> /* Work out how many devices we have below this PE */ >>- traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); >>+ pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); >> >> if (counts.num_devices == 0) { >> pr_err("rtas_msi: found 0 devices under PE for %s\n", >>@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) >> /* else, we have some more calculating to do */ >> counts.requestor = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev); >> counts.request = request; >>- traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); >>+ pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); >> >> /* If the quota isn't an integer multiple of the total, we can >> * use the remainder as spare MSIs for anyone that wants them. */ >> > > >-- >Alexey > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 04/20/2016 11:27 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:51:03PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>> This renames traverse_pci_devices() to pci_traverse_device_nodes(). >>> The function traverses all subordinate device nodes of the specified >>> one. Also, below cleanup applied to the function. No logical changes >>> introduced. >>> >>> * Rename "pre" to "fn". >>> * Avoid assignment in if condition reported from checkpatch.pl. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h | 6 +++--- >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 4 ++-- >>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>> index ca0c5bf..8753e4e 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>> @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ extern struct pci_dev *isa_bridge_pcidev; /* may be NULL if no ISA bus */ >>> struct device_node; >>> struct pci_dn; >>> >>> -typedef void *(*traverse_func)(struct device_node *me, void *data); >> >> >> >> Why removing this typedef? Typedef's are good. >> >> Anyway, >> > > Could you please provide more details why it's good? I removed it > because it was used for only once. I have some thoughts but never mind, nobody seems to care about this and typedefs are considered bad by the CodingStyle. > > >> >> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >> >> >> >> >>> -void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >>> - void *data); >>> +void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, >>> + void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), >>> + void *data); >>> void *traverse_pci_dn(struct pci_dn *root, >>> void *(*fn)(struct pci_dn *, void *), >>> void *data); >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>> index ce10281..ecdccce 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>> @@ -372,8 +372,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_remove_device_node_info); >>> * one of these nodes we also assume its siblings are non-pci for >>> * performance. >>> */ >>> -void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >>> - void *data) >>> +void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, >>> + void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), >>> + void *data) >>> { >>> struct device_node *dn, *nextdn; >>> void *ret; >>> @@ -388,8 +389,11 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >>> if (classp) >>> class = of_read_number(classp, 1); >>> >>> - if (pre && ((ret = pre(dn, data)) != NULL)) >>> - return ret; >>> + if (fn) { >>> + ret = fn(dn, data); >>> + if (ret) >>> + return ret; >>> + } >>> >>> /* If we are a PCI bridge, go down */ >>> if (dn->child && ((class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI || >>> @@ -411,6 +415,7 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, >>> } >>> return NULL; >>> } >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_traverse_device_nodes); >>> >>> static struct pci_dn *pci_dn_next_one(struct pci_dn *root, >>> struct pci_dn *pdn) >>> @@ -487,7 +492,7 @@ void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) >>> } >>> >>> /* Update dn->phb ptrs for new phb and children devices */ >>> - traverse_pci_devices(dn, add_pdn, phb); >>> + pci_traverse_device_nodes(dn, add_pdn, phb); >>> } >>> >>> /** >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c >>> index 272e9ec..543a638 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c >>> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) >>> memset(&counts, 0, sizeof(struct msi_counts)); >>> >>> /* Work out how many devices we have below this PE */ >>> - traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); >>> + pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); >>> >>> if (counts.num_devices == 0) { >>> pr_err("rtas_msi: found 0 devices under PE for %s\n", >>> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) >>> /* else, we have some more calculating to do */ >>> counts.requestor = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev); >>> counts.request = request; >>> - traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); >>> + pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); >>> >>> /* If the quota isn't an integer multiple of the total, we can >>> * use the remainder as spare MSIs for anyone that wants them. */ >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alexey >> >
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h index ca0c5bf..8753e4e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ extern struct pci_dev *isa_bridge_pcidev; /* may be NULL if no ISA bus */ struct device_node; struct pci_dn; -typedef void *(*traverse_func)(struct device_node *me, void *data); -void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, - void *data); +void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, + void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), + void *data); void *traverse_pci_dn(struct pci_dn *root, void *(*fn)(struct pci_dn *, void *), void *data); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c index ce10281..ecdccce 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c @@ -372,8 +372,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_remove_device_node_info); * one of these nodes we also assume its siblings are non-pci for * performance. */ -void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, - void *data) +void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, + void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *), + void *data) { struct device_node *dn, *nextdn; void *ret; @@ -388,8 +389,11 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, if (classp) class = of_read_number(classp, 1); - if (pre && ((ret = pre(dn, data)) != NULL)) - return ret; + if (fn) { + ret = fn(dn, data); + if (ret) + return ret; + } /* If we are a PCI bridge, go down */ if (dn->child && ((class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI || @@ -411,6 +415,7 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre, } return NULL; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_traverse_device_nodes); static struct pci_dn *pci_dn_next_one(struct pci_dn *root, struct pci_dn *pdn) @@ -487,7 +492,7 @@ void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) } /* Update dn->phb ptrs for new phb and children devices */ - traverse_pci_devices(dn, add_pdn, phb); + pci_traverse_device_nodes(dn, add_pdn, phb); } /** diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c index 272e9ec..543a638 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) memset(&counts, 0, sizeof(struct msi_counts)); /* Work out how many devices we have below this PE */ - traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); + pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts); if (counts.num_devices == 0) { pr_err("rtas_msi: found 0 devices under PE for %s\n", @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request) /* else, we have some more calculating to do */ counts.requestor = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev); counts.request = request; - traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); + pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts); /* If the quota isn't an integer multiple of the total, we can * use the remainder as spare MSIs for anyone that wants them. */
This renames traverse_pci_devices() to pci_traverse_device_nodes(). The function traverses all subordinate device nodes of the specified one. Also, below cleanup applied to the function. No logical changes introduced. * Rename "pre" to "fn". * Avoid assignment in if condition reported from checkpatch.pl. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h | 6 +++--- arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 15 ++++++++++----- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)