Message ID | 1464621262-26770-10-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:14:22 PM CEST Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > + bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift; > + cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz; > + cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1; > + cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; > + cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res, > + &pci_generic_ecam_ops); > + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { > + pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res, > + PTR_ERR(cfg)); > + return PTR_ERR(cfg); > + } > + > + ri->cfg = cfg; > + return 0; > +} I wonder if we could do this a little simpler and just put a pointer to the mmconfig space into struct pci_host_bridge, and then have a trivial map_bus function alongside pci_generic_config_read/pci_generic_config_write. As this code is specific to arch/arm64, we don't need any of the complexity of drivers/pci/ecam.c, which basically only exists to work around the limited virtual address space of 32-bit machines. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:14:22 PM CEST Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> + bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift; >> + cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz; >> + cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1; >> + cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; >> + cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res, >> + &pci_generic_ecam_ops); >> + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { >> + pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res, >> + PTR_ERR(cfg)); >> + return PTR_ERR(cfg); >> + } >> + >> + ri->cfg = cfg; >> + return 0; >> +} > > I wonder if we could do this a little simpler and just put a pointer > to the mmconfig space into struct pci_host_bridge, and then have a trivial > map_bus function alongside pci_generic_config_read/pci_generic_config_write. > > As this code is specific to arch/arm64, we don't need any of the complexity > of drivers/pci/ecam.c, which basically only exists to work around the > limited virtual address space of 32-bit machines. The map_bus provided by pci-ecam.h is already trivial in 64bit case, it was written so that it could be optimized at compile time. The pci_ecam_create is a useful to have here instead of redoing the request_resource/ioremap sequence. The struct pci_config_window can be moved into struct pci_host_bridge (or a wrapper of pci_host_bridge) when we have the setup to point bus->sysdata to something like that. The ECAM API can be fixed up to handle that case as well. I did not make any changes since the pci_host_bridge discussion is still going on. JC. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start > using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses. > > The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions > through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping > and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space. > > On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case > we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement > ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window > structure. > > Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write} > at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is > correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> > Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> [...] > +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */ Nit: s/resrouces/resources > +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + > + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); > + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); > + kfree(ri); > +} > + > +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = { > + .release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info, > +}; > + > +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ > struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > { > - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */ > - return NULL; > + int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle); > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; > + int err; > + > + ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node); > + if (!ri) > + return NULL; > + > + err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri); > + if (err) > + return NULL; ^ Leaking memory -> kfree(ri) > + acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; > + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common, > + ri->cfg); > + if (!bus) > + return NULL; Ditto. > + > + pci_bus_size_bridges(bus); > + pci_bus_assign_resources(bus); > + > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > + > + return bus; > } > > void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index 9661c85..f66d188 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > return bus->domain_nr; > } > +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus); Technically speaking, this should be introduced in a separate patch; given that I know it is a temporary plaster and no other architecture will have to implement it I reckon it is fine to leave it here, I will make it disappear as fast as I can. We can argue if it is best to move the ACPI bits into a separate file (acpi-pci.c), I am fine with keeping DT/ACPI in one file if that's fine with Catalin and Will. You can send the fix-ups above in the final pull request which I hope is nigh. Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > +#else > static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; } > +#endif > void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent); > #else > static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 02.06.2016 11:35, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start >> using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses. >> >> The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions >> through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping >> and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space. >> >> On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case >> we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement >> ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window >> structure. >> >> Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write} >> at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is >> correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> > > [...] > >> +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */ > > Nit: s/resrouces/resources > >> +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) >> +{ >> + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; >> + >> + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); >> + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); >> + kfree(ri); >> +} >> + >> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = { >> + .release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info, >> +}; >> + >> +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ >> struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) >> { >> - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */ >> - return NULL; >> + int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle); >> + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; >> + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; >> + int err; >> + >> + ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node); >> + if (!ri) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri); >> + if (err) >> + return NULL; > ^ > Leaking memory -> kfree(ri) I missed that. Will fix. > >> + acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; >> + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common, >> + ri->cfg); >> + if (!bus) >> + return NULL; > > Ditto. Here kfree(ri) is not needed. __acpi_pci_root_release_info will free ri inside of acpi_pci_root_create. > >> + >> + pci_bus_size_bridges(bus); >> + pci_bus_assign_resources(bus); >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) >> + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); >> + >> + return bus; >> } >> >> void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h >> index 9661c85..f66d188 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h >> @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) >> { >> return bus->domain_nr; >> } >> +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus); > > Technically speaking, this should be introduced in a separate patch; > given that I know it is a temporary plaster and no other architecture will > have to implement it I reckon it is fine to leave it here, I will make > it disappear as fast as I can. > > We can argue if it is best to move the ACPI bits into a separate file > (acpi-pci.c), I am fine with keeping DT/ACPI in one file if that's fine > with Catalin and Will. > > You can send the fix-ups above in the final pull request which I hope > is nigh. > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Thanks, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start > using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses. > > The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions > through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping > and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space. > > On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case > we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement > ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window > structure. > > Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write} > at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is > correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before. I think this is important and needs to be spelled out a little more explicitly using the terms from the ACPI spec so it will make sense to people like BIOS writers who might be bitten by this. "raw_pci_read()" is a Linux term that won't mean anything to them. But they might expect that AML can access PCI config space before the Linux driver claims the host bridge, and I think you're saying that will not work. > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> > Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 + > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/pci.h | 5 ++ > 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 76747d9..87c48ad 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config ARM64 > select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI > select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI > select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI > + select ACPI_MCFG if ACPI > select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED > select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE > select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE > @@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ config ARM64 > select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE > select OF_NUMA if NUMA && OF > select OF_RESERVED_MEM > + select PCI_ECAM if ACPI > select PERF_USE_VMALLOC > select POWER_RESET > select POWER_SUPPLY > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > index 3663be1..39f2a40 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ > #include <linux/mm.h> > #include <linux/of_pci.h> > #include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/pci.h> > #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > > /* > @@ -71,13 +73,21 @@ int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) > { > - return -ENXIO; > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > + > + if (!b) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > } > > int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) > { > - return -ENXIO; > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > + > + if (!b) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > } I think these functions could be under #ifdef ACPI, couldn't they? I see x86 and ia64 don't do that, and they do call them from non-ACPI places. So maybe there'd be no point in doing it differently here. You could split this out into a separate patch, though, which would be a nice way to highlight the issue of AML access before pci_root.c claims the bridge. > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > @@ -91,11 +101,111 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node); > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > -/* Root bridge scanning */ > + > +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info { > + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */ > +}; > + > +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); > + struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev); > + > + return root->segment; > +} > + > +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > +{ > + if (!acpi_disabled) { > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->bus->sysdata; > + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); > + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, adev); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space > + * mapping. > + */ > +static int pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root, > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri) Maybe return the "struct pci_config_window *" and do the assignment in the caller? Then I don't think you'd have to pass in "ri". > +{ > + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary; > + u16 seg = root->segment; > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; > + struct resource cfgres; > + unsigned int bsz; > + int err; > + > + err = pci_mcfg_lookup(root); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("%04x:%pR MCFG region not found\n", seg, bus_res); dev_err() > + return err; > + } > + > + bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift; > + cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz; > + cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1; > + cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; > + cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res, > + &pci_generic_ecam_ops); > + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { > + pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res, > + PTR_ERR(cfg)); dev_err() > + return PTR_ERR(cfg); > + } > + > + ri->cfg = cfg; > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */ > +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + > + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); > + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); > + kfree(ri); > +} > + > +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = { > + .release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info, > +}; > + > +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ > struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > { > - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */ > - return NULL; > + int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle); > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; > + int err; > + > + ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node); > + if (!ri) > + return NULL; > + > + err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri); > + if (err) > + return NULL; > + > + acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; > + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common, > + ri->cfg); > + if (!bus) > + return NULL; > + > + pci_bus_size_bridges(bus); > + pci_bus_assign_resources(bus); > + > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > + > + return bus; > } > > void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index 9661c85..f66d188 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > return bus->domain_nr; > } > +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus); > +#else > static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; } > +#endif > void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent); > #else > static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, > -- > 1.9.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 76747d9..87c48ad 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config ARM64 select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI + select ACPI_MCFG if ACPI select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE @@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ config ARM64 select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE select OF_NUMA if NUMA && OF select OF_RESERVED_MEM + select PCI_ECAM if ACPI select PERF_USE_VMALLOC select POWER_RESET select POWER_SUPPLY diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c index 3663be1..39f2a40 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/of_pci.h> #include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> #include <linux/slab.h> /* @@ -71,13 +73,21 @@ int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) { - return -ENXIO; + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); + + if (!b) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val); } int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) { - return -ENXIO; + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); + + if (!b) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val); } #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA @@ -91,11 +101,111 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node); #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -/* Root bridge scanning */ + +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info { + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; + struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */ +}; + +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); + struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev); + + return root->segment; +} + +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) +{ + if (!acpi_disabled) { + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->bus->sysdata; + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, adev); + } + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space + * mapping. + */ +static int pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root, + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri) +{ + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary; + u16 seg = root->segment; + struct pci_config_window *cfg; + struct resource cfgres; + unsigned int bsz; + int err; + + err = pci_mcfg_lookup(root); + if (err) { + pr_err("%04x:%pR MCFG region not found\n", seg, bus_res); + return err; + } + + bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift; + cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz; + cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1; + cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; + cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res, + &pci_generic_ecam_ops); + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { + pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res, + PTR_ERR(cfg)); + return PTR_ERR(cfg); + } + + ri->cfg = cfg; + return 0; +} + +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */ +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; + + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); + kfree(ri); +} + +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = { + .release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info, +}; + +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) { - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */ - return NULL; + int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle); + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; + int err; + + ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node); + if (!ri) + return NULL; + + err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri); + if (err) + return NULL; + + acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common, + ri->cfg); + if (!bus) + return NULL; + + pci_bus_size_bridges(bus); + pci_bus_assign_resources(bus); + + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); + + return bus; } void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 9661c85..f66d188 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return bus->domain_nr; } +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */ +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus); +#else static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; } +#endif void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent); #else static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus,