| Message ID | 1484997072-19276-3-git-send-email-bharatku@xilinx.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
On 21/01/17 11:11, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > Legacy interrupts are level sensitive, so using handle_level_irq > is more approprate as it is masks interrupts until End point handles > interrupts and unmasks interrutps after End point handler is executed. > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > --- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > index e1809f9..50f9c0d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void nwl_unmask_leg_irq(struct irq_data *data) > static int nwl_legacy_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, > irq_hw_number_t hwirq) > { > - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq); > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_level_irq); > irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data); > > return 0; > Please merge this patch and the following one in patch #2. There is no need for going through equally broken intermediate steps. Thanks, M.
> On 21/01/17 11:11, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > Legacy interrupts are level sensitive, so using handle_level_irq is > > more approprate as it is masks interrupts until End point handles > > interrupts and unmasks interrutps after End point handler is executed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > > index e1809f9..50f9c0d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void nwl_unmask_leg_irq(struct irq_data > > *data) static int nwl_legacy_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, > > irq_hw_number_t hwirq) > > { > > - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq); > > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_level_irq); > > irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data); > > > > return 0; > > > > Please merge this patch and the following one in patch #2. There is no need for > going through equally broken intermediate steps. > Agreed, will merge it with second patch. Thanks & Regards, Bharat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c index e1809f9..50f9c0d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void nwl_unmask_leg_irq(struct irq_data *data) static int nwl_legacy_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq) { - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq); + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_level_irq); irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data); return 0;
Legacy interrupts are level sensitive, so using handle_level_irq is more approprate as it is masks interrupts until End point handles interrupts and unmasks interrutps after End point handler is executed. Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> --- drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)